E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods Discussion about both stock and aftermarket parts for the E60. Accessories and modifications too!

Issues with Umnitza angel eye/halo install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2005, 02:07 PM
  #51  
das
Site Founders
 
das's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2021 F93 M8 Competition
Default

Well, I fully support our members sharing their experiences with different products, vendors, and so on.

It sounds like this was a frustrating experience, and perhaps expectations weren't set properly, but as far as I can tell, isn't characteristic of interactions with Umnitza.

Let's try to keep the thread civil, however. Thanks.
das is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:25 PM
  #52  
Members
Thread Starter
 
choi000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i 6spd, blk on blk, HRE 540R 20x9 in front and 20x10 in rear with Pirelli PZero Neros 245/25/20 front and 295/25/20 rear. H&R springs, and Eisenmann quad exhaust, V! radar detector, black grille, limo tint all around.
Default

Originally Posted by das' post='208876' date='Dec 8 2005, 03:07 PM
Well, I fully support our members sharing their experiences with different products, vendors, and so on.

It sounds like this was a frustrating experience, and perhaps expectations weren't set properly, but as far as I can tell, isn't characteristic of interactions with Umnitza.

Let's try to keep the thread civil, however. Thanks.
I totally agree with you Das. I'd have to say I have been cordial but you know I gotta say something back to SunnyD... I find it interesting and curious to say, how this thread just came back to life after it's been dead for a while now and that the only posts that SunnyD contributed to thus far have all been on this thread. And furthermore, it seems a bit odd that SunnyD just signed up on this forum yesterday (12/7/05) right after Umnitza responded back to this post which was as I said before, been dead for a while. Does something smell fishy here? Maybe it's SunnyD.
choi000 is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:50 PM
  #53  
Senior Members
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by choi000' post='208884
Well, I fully support our members sharing their experiences with different products, vendors, and so on.

It sounds like this was a frustrating experience, and perhaps expectations weren't set properly, but as far as I can tell, isn't characteristic of interactions with Umnitza.

Let's try to keep the thread civil, however. Thanks.
I totally agree with you Das. I'd have to say I have been cordial but you know I gotta say something back to SunnyD... I find it interesting and curious to say, how this thread just came back to life after it's been dead for a while now and that the only posts that SunnyD contributed to thus far have all been on this thread. And furthermore, it seems a bit odd that SunnyD just signed up on this forum yesterday (12/7/05) right after Umnitza responded back to this post which was as I said before, been dead for a while. Does something smell fishy here? Maybe it's SunnyD.
[/quote]

I'm not taking sides here, but I think a distinction should be made clear.

Did umnitza sell a defective product? Or merely a product that the buyer (i.e. choi000) could not install on the car?

If the former (i.e. defective product), then I believe choi000 is 100% entitled to a full refund and has every right to be upset. As to shipping costs, that's really dependent on what umnitza's return policy was when the product was first purchased, and whether it was disclosed to choi000 at the time of purchase.

If the latter (i.e. choi000 could not find someone suitable to install the angel eyes even though the angel eyes presumably work fine when installed), then umnitza should not be held responsible in this instance. umnitza sells these products, it is not an installer. It's like if a person buys a set of H&R Springs but lives in Timbucktoo, where a qualified mechanic is as plentiful as a glacier in the Mojave Desert. In that case, it isn't the fault of H&R that the springs cannot be installed (assuming again that the springs are free of defect).

Sure, umnitza may have represented to choi000 that there was an installer qualified and prepared to do the work, but was that really part of the bargain? Put another way, would choi000 have bought the angel eyes if umnitza said he did not personally know of any installers in SoCal? Maybe, maybe not ... dunno.

In this case it just seems like umnitza did not sell a defective product and the problem (if it is in fact a problem) is that choi000 has yet to find someone who can install the angel eyes.

Again, I am not defending anyone in this instance and have known people who have had bad experiences with umnitza, but to me it just seems like the problem lies in finding a qualified installer -- not with the product itself.
ipse dixit is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:18 PM
  #54  
das
Site Founders
 
das's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2021 F93 M8 Competition
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit' post='208887' date='Dec 8 2005, 05:50 PM
I'm not taking sides here, but I think a distinction should be made clear.

Did umnitza sell a defective product? Or merely a product that the buyer (i.e. choi000) could not install on the car?

If the former (i.e. defective product), then I believe choi000 is 100% entitled to a full refund and has every right to be upset. As to shipping costs, that's really dependent on what umnitza's return policy was when the product was first purchased, and whether it was disclosed to choi000 at the time of purchase.

If the latter (i.e. choi000 could not find someone suitable to install the angel eyes even though the angel eyes presumably work fine when installed), then umnitza should not be held responsible in this instance. umnitza sells these products, it is not an installer. It's like if a person buys a set of H&R Springs but lives in Timbucktoo, where a qualified mechanic is as plentiful as a glacier in the Mojave Desert. In that case, it isn't the fault of H&R that the springs cannot be installed (assuming again that the springs are free of defect).

Sure, umnitza may have represented to choi000 that there was an installer qualified and prepared to do the work, but was that really part of the bargain? Put another way, would choi000 have bought the angel eyes if umnitza said he did not personally know of any installers in SoCal? Maybe, maybe not ... dunno.

In this case it just seems like umnitza did not sell a defective product and the problem (if it is in fact a problem) is that choi000 has yet to find someone who can install the angel eyes.

Again, I am not defending anyone in this instance and have known people who have had bad experiences with umnitza, but to me it just seems like the problem lies in finding a qualified installer -- not with the product itself.
I think the situation here is that the product isn't necessarily defective (and probably isn't), it's that Choi probably wouldn't have bought them at all if he wasn't led to believe there was a person who could install them. A lot of Umnitza's business probably depends on a capable installer being available to install the part(s). I'll admit I haven't scoured every detail in the previous posts here, but it sounds like it was expected that someone would be able to do this install. However, in the case of a particular part on a particular vehicle, it sounds like sometimes it could be the case no local installer is available. I realize that this upset Choi, especially since it appears that it was presented that the installation would be no problem, and regardless of what did or didn't happen in the ensuing time as far as contacting, it's probably the case that if this one installer wasn't going to be able to do it, no one in his area would be able to. At that point, I probably would have just gotten my money back and eaten the return shipping. Who knows, perhaps Umnitza would have covered the return shipping too. But whatever happened, I'd just chalk it up to experience. I really don't believe Umnitza was out to screw anyone over here, but perhaps Umnitza should have been clearer about that fact that you're buying the part, not the installation (if that's the case - does Umnitza make any guarantee or claim that it WILL be installed?). So I understand Choi's position: he bought something he wanted, and his expectation was that it would be installed. When that couldn't happen, he was upset. But all Umnitza can really do is take it back. If someone isn't in a geographic location where an appropriate installer is available, there's not much they can do. Obviously, if it happens enough, they'll probably figure, "gee, we won't sell any E60 angel eyes in City X because people keep ordering them and we have to keep taking them back because they can't get them installed." Not to diminish anyone's poor experience, and there probably was some miscommunication here on both sides, but it doesn't strike me that Umnitza would basically just want to tell a customer to F off. All they can do is take back the part and apologize that it didn't work out...and Umnitza will probably think twice before telling another E60 customer in Choi's area that the installer can do angel eyes on E60. Though they probably had no reason to believe their installer *wouldn't* be able to do it, perhaps it also wouldn't hurt if more details about specific installation applications were tracked by Umnitza.

And for the record, sunnyd and umnitza aren't posting from anywhere near the same location.
das is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:21 PM
  #55  
Members
 
sunnyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by choi000' post='208884
Well, I fully support our members sharing their experiences with different products, vendors, and so on.

It sounds like this was a frustrating experience, and perhaps expectations weren't set properly, but as far as I can tell, isn't characteristic of interactions with Umnitza.

Let's try to keep the thread civil, however. Thanks.
I totally agree with you Das. I'd have to say I have been cordial but you know I gotta say something back to SunnyD... I find it interesting and curious to say, how this thread just came back to life after it's been dead for a while now and that the only posts that SunnyD contributed to thus far have all been on this thread. And furthermore, it seems a bit odd that SunnyD just signed up on this forum yesterday (12/7/05) right after Umnitza responded back to this post which was as I said before, been dead for a while. Does something smell fishy here? Maybe it's SunnyD.
[/quote]
so now you try to attack me?
the only fishy smell here is under your arm pits, i call a spade a spade when i see one, you may find it curious but i am sure the admin can confirm that i am in Ga which is no where near california. sorry to disappoint but no conspiracies here.

you may not like what i say but its the truth you're a classic e-thug, when things don't go your way you start attacking others, look in the mirror, that's where all your troubles are.
sunnyd is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:25 PM
  #56  
das
Site Founders
 
das's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2021 F93 M8 Competition
Default

Alright, let's all calm down. Don't want any locked threads, here.
das is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:39 PM
  #57  
Former Vendor
 
umnitza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Ba
Posts: 3,680
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My Ride: M5
Model Year: 2008
Default

Lest anyone question why I'm here?
My wife's car is a disaster, yet another thing wrong on the 7, so I'm researching the E60 as a possible alternative.

Then I see my credibility being attacked, so I respond. Nothing more, nothing less.

JC - you have no need to continue this other than a chip on your shoulder what might have been. Let's just back away and let it go.

Thanks for the support of all, and we hope you'll experience our quality products soon as we are making some CF strut bars, intakes, and some other cool HID related products like HID fogs for your cars
umnitza is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 05:03 PM
  #58  
Senior Members
 
m5lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: friscoo,CA -----> jakarta,indonesia
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: '04 BMW E60 530 black/black '05 Porsche Cayene S Black/gold 05' BMW M5 05' Bentley CGT
Default

drama at its finest!sigh
m5lover is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 05:11 PM
  #59  
Members
 
545smg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco, Califonia
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i SMG, Dinan Flywheel, M Sport Kit Blk, Blk.
Default

Originally Posted by sunnyd' post='208870
Originally Posted by das' post='208848' date='Dec 8 2005, 02:13 PM
I have a question. Did, or did not, Umnitza offer a full and complete refund when the installer decided he couldn't do the E60 install for whatever reason?

If they did, I don't see what the problem is here, other than inconvenience.
Well, the problem here is not just the refund of my money. Umnitza offered me a refund for the angel eyes but the offer didn't include the shipping costs for the product to me and of course I would have to pay for the shipping of the parts back to him. And the refund was not offered until I was pissed off having been brushed aside and being told that his guy Ben could still do the install, eventhough I was told by Ben face to face that he couldn't do it because his oven was not hot enough to bake the headlights properly without possibly warping my headlights.
Now the inconvenience part is also of an issue considering I still need to get my bumper reinstalled correctly because Umitza's guy Ben didn't do the job correctly and there's a 3/4 inch gap between my bumper and the hood. And that's gonna cost money to do.
when modifying a car there's a chance things will not turn exactly as you hope/wish they do, hence the word modifying (to change or alter the original) being pissed off is very understandable, being childish, threatening, vindictive and purposely lying on a public forum explicitly to cause harm and tarnish one's reputation however is not.

the more i read your replies the less sympathy i have for you, you had 100% of it with your first post you are now bellow zero.
[/quote]

The arm pit comment/reply was pretty weak to Choi. Al the bashing is uncalled for. Not to take any sides here but I've stated this in the past. as many may have reviewed.

I do think the forum is a good place to give some leverage to consumers.

If the purchase was predicated on directing choi to an experienced installer and the mfg told him that they done this before -and install was screwed up, I would be pissed to - and maybe I would kindly inform forum members that this mfg. sold me goods on false pretenses by alleviating my worries that he has an experienced installer.

That's it.

If the installer screwed up the install, damaged the car - then I would take it out on my relationship with the "salesman" and the installer.

At the end of the day, I was thinking about doing the same mod, but its not one that I would try myself, I'm going to rely on teh recommendation of the mfg. If he has an installer that's done it before- then maybe I'll purchase.

But I'm not going to purchase angel eyes and have some mechanic install, when perhaps I need an electrician or an engineer that has some experience.
545smg is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 05:24 PM
  #60  
Members
Thread Starter
 
choi000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i 6spd, blk on blk, HRE 540R 20x9 in front and 20x10 in rear with Pirelli PZero Neros 245/25/20 front and 295/25/20 rear. H&R springs, and Eisenmann quad exhaust, V! radar detector, black grille, limo tint all around.
Default

Originally Posted by das' post='208895
I'm not taking sides here, but I think a distinction should be made clear.

Did umnitza sell a defective product? Or merely a product that the buyer (i.e. choi000) could not install on the car?

If the former (i.e. defective product), then I believe choi000 is 100% entitled to a full refund and has every right to be upset. As to shipping costs, that's really dependent on what umnitza's return policy was when the product was first purchased, and whether it was disclosed to choi000 at the time of purchase.

If the latter (i.e. choi000 could not find someone suitable to install the angel eyes even though the angel eyes presumably work fine when installed), then umnitza should not be held responsible in this instance. umnitza sells these products, it is not an installer. It's like if a person buys a set of H&R Springs but lives in Timbucktoo, where a qualified mechanic is as plentiful as a glacier in the Mojave Desert. In that case, it isn't the fault of H&R that the springs cannot be installed (assuming again that the springs are free of defect).

Sure, umnitza may have represented to choi000 that there was an installer qualified and prepared to do the work, but was that really part of the bargain? Put another way, would choi000 have bought the angel eyes if umnitza said he did not personally know of any installers in SoCal? Maybe, maybe not ... dunno.

In this case it just seems like umnitza did not sell a defective product and the problem (if it is in fact a problem) is that choi000 has yet to find someone who can install the angel eyes.

Again, I am not defending anyone in this instance and have known people who have had bad experiences with umnitza, but to me it just seems like the problem lies in finding a qualified installer -- not with the product itself.
I think the situation here is that the product isn't necessarily defective (and probably isn't), it's that Choi probably wouldn't have bought them at all if he wasn't led to believe there was a person who could install them. A lot of Umnitza's business probably depends on a capable installer being available to install the part(s). I'll admit I haven't scoured every detail in the previous posts here, but it sounds like it was expected that someone would be able to do this install. However, in the case of a particular part on a particular vehicle, it sounds like sometimes it could be the case no local installer is available. I realize that this upset Choi, especially since it appears that it was presented that the installation would be no problem, and regardless of what did or didn't happen in the ensuing time as far as contacting, it's probably the case that if this one installer wasn't going to be able to do it, no one in his area would be able to. At that point, I probably would have just gotten my money back and eaten the return shipping. Who knows, perhaps Umnitza would have covered the return shipping too. But whatever happened, I'd just chalk it up to experience. I really don't believe Umnitza was out to screw anyone over here, but perhaps Umnitza should have been clearer about that fact that you're buying the part, not the installation (if that's the case - does Umnitza make any guarantee or claim that it WILL be installed?). So I understand Choi's position: he bought something he wanted, and his expectation was that it would be installed. When that couldn't happen, he was upset. But all Umnitza can really do is take it back. If someone isn't in a geographic location where an appropriate installer is available, there's not much they can do. Obviously, if it happens enough, they'll probably figure, "gee, we won't sell any E60 angel eyes in City X because people keep ordering them and we have to keep taking them back because they can't get them installed." Not to diminish anyone's poor experience, and there probably was some miscommunication here on both sides, but it doesn't strike me that Umnitza would basically just want to tell a customer to F off. All they can do is take back the part and apologize that it didn't work out...and Umnitza will probably think twice before telling another E60 customer in Choi's area that the installer can do angel eyes on E60. Though they probably had no reason to believe their installer *wouldn't* be able to do it, perhaps it also wouldn't hurt if more details about specific installation applications were tracked by Umnitza.

And for the record, sunnyd and umnitza aren't posting from anywhere near the same location.
[/quote]

Yes, I do agree that Umnitza's product, the angel eyes, are not defective, and yes I definitely would not have bought the product if I wasn't told by Umnitza that there is a reputable installer in my area that can do the job. So all in all, I did feel cheated.
As for my statement towards Sunnyd. I do apologize, I shouldn't have attacked you earlier.
choi000 is offline  


Quick Reply: Issues with Umnitza angel eye/halo install



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 AM.