E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Update on Performance Woes from 20.01.00

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2006, 03:03 PM
  #31  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by EBMCS03' post='231621' date='Jan 29 2006, 07:00 PM
Wow since it learns like this... I wonder what'll happen when you dont drive it hard for a week... you'll get a slow car again... Sheesh I bet my car is like 0 to 60 in 8 secs by now!
I don't think it matters if you don't drive it; it's not that smart.

And, for all, I updated my analysis in my prior post (#29) given more time to think this afternoon.
Old 01-29-2006, 05:49 PM
  #32  
Senior Members
 
grogan545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
Default

Originally Posted by Znod' post='231406' date='Jan 29 2006, 11:35 AM
Here is today's update from 3:30 a.m. at 42 degrees. I added tests 3 and 4 to the post 20.01.00 data. The car was a bit slower today, but not noticeably so. I have, as yesterday, some wheel spin back--to the point where I abort some runs. I aborted one run today. The differences on the "zero tos" (e.g., for zero to sixty and the 1/8) are not large, but they still are troubling since I have been testing in slightly cooler weather. Time will tell whether the effects on 20.01.00 will go away completely. Maybe I'll have news from the foreman/engineer by tomorrow or Tuesday.

Looking at differences in the changes ("old" less "new")

70-80 0.129
60-70 -0.034
50-60 -0.068
40-50 -0.020
30-40 -0.046
20-30 -0.002
10-20 -0.030
0-10 0.009

reveals that the major differences favoring the "old" car (i.e., the negative differences) occur between 10 and 20 MPH, 30 and 40 MPH, 50 and 60 MPH, and 60 to 70 MPH. The second and last of these changes occur over speeds at which the Step shifts. So, is worse Step shifting part of the problem?

On the other hand, the most significant difference occurs between 50 and 60 MPH. In this regard, I wonder if the Step is shifting earlier than it should. Without getting into the calculations, the pertinent data are as follows:

Top speed in 1st gear would be 6,350 / 6,500(34.28769707) = 33.49644252
Top speed in 2nd gear would be (6,350 / 6,500)61.10243456 = 59.69237838
Top speed in 3rd gear would be (6,350 / 6,500)94.06559005 = 91.89484566
Top speed in 4th gear would be (6,350 /6,500)125.42078674 = 122.52646089

So, if the Step shifts from second to third at 6,350 RPM, then it would be shifting prior to 60 MPH which would produce an unusual 50 to 60 MPH difference.

Finally, I think that the large positive difference (.129) for 70 to 80 MPG is interesting. If it weren't for this difference the "two" cars would not be nearly so close in the 1/8th and to 80 MPG. I can't explain what is happening here, but similar differences occur across all 4 post 20.01.00 tests. Did the effects of DSC and DTC finally go away after 70 MPH? If these values are to be believed, the new car is very competitive with the old car in getting to 80 MPG.

Any thoughts anyone?
Hi Znod
Been examining your data and I think you are on the right track about the shifting situation.If you compare data from 0-10,0-20,and 0-30 you see there is very little diff between 19.01 & 20.01.But you are slower by .1 at 0-40.I believe this is due to a slower and sloppier shift to M2.You maintain the .1 slower from 0-40 and 0-50.The 0-60 time is more than .2 slower than with 19-01.Maybe your shift to M3 is right at 60mph and is slower and sloppier than previously thereby causing more lost time.Once in M3 you are no longer losing time versus 19.01.The cooler weather could be helping your 0-80 times(more horsepower).

Even though you had trouble spinning your tires I don't think the DCS/DTS situation is the problem.It appears you are losing most of the time dff during shifting.
Old 01-29-2006, 05:58 PM
  #33  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by grogan545' post='231691' date='Jan 29 2006, 09:49 PM
Hi Znod
Been examining your data and I think you are on the right track about the shifting situation.If you compare data from 0-10,0-20,and 0-30 you see there is very little diff between 19.01 & 20.01.But you are slower by .1 at 0-40.I believe this is due to a slower and sloppier shift to M2.You maintain the .1 slower from 0-40 and 0-50.The 0-60 time is more than .2 slower than with 19-01.Maybe your shift to M3 is right at 60mph and is slower and sloppier than previously thereby causing more lost time.Once in M3 you are no longer losing time versus 19.01.The cooler weather could be helping your 0-80 times(more horsepower).

Even though you had trouble spinning your tires I don't think the DCS/DTS situation is the problem.It appears you are losing most of the time dff during shifting.
Thanks for the interest my friend. The next time I go out I am going to pay more attention to when my car appears to shift to 3rd. And, I have noticed that the 1-2 shift is not as "exciting" as it used to be. If shifting is a problem, then the excessive decreases in road torque, etc., could explain the other differences. It is interesting that my off-the-line performance has improved some. I hope that is good and not a dysfunction. I may try beating the Step to it and shifting manually once. We shall see, and maybe shifting software would be the cure all. Or maybe the Step will "learn better."
Old 01-30-2006, 11:17 AM
  #34  
Senior Members
 
grogan545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
Default

Originally Posted by Znod' post='231693
Hi Znod
Been examining your data and I think you are on the right track about the shifting situation.If you compare data from 0-10,0-20,and 0-30 you see there is very little diff between 19.01 & 20.01.But you are slower by .1 at 0-40.I believe this is due to a slower and sloppier shift to M2.You maintain the .1 slower from 0-40 and 0-50.The 0-60 time is more than .2 slower than with 19-01.Maybe your shift to M3 is right at 60mph and is slower and sloppier than previously thereby causing more lost time.Once in M3 you are no longer losing time versus 19.01.The cooler weather could be helping your 0-80 times(more horsepower).

Even though you had trouble spinning your tires I don't think the DCS/DTS situation is the problem.It appears you are losing most of the time dff during shifting.
Thanks for the interest my friend. The next time I go out I am going to pay more attention to when my car appears to shift to 3rd. And, I have noticed that the 1-2 shift is not as "exciting" as it used to be. If shifting is a problem, then the excessive decreases in road torque, etc., could explain the other differences. It is interesting that my off-the-line performance has improved some. I hope that is good and not a dysfunction. I may try beating the Step to it and shifting manually once. We shall see, and maybe shifting software would be the cure all. Or maybe the Step will "learn better."
[/quote]

Woe is me Znod.My car is in for a problem with the adaptive headlights.The right light is stuck in the extreme right position.They are going to replace the headlight ass'y.If that does't correct the problem they must replace the computer module.If they replace the computer module they must reprogram with 20.01.I was told they cannot use older programs,but must use the current rev when reprogramming.I am praying that the headlight ass'y corrects the problem.I am not sure 20.01 is a problem but I would rather not find out the hard way.Have you received any feedback from your dealer regarding your situation?
Old 01-30-2006, 01:01 PM
  #35  
Senior Members
 
Don Juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Florida -
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SHOOT! I have a BMW service appointment tomorrow morning for an SIB (service bulletin) for rough start in the mornings[b] what to do ? I can live without the upgrade because i have lived without it since I bough my car..so I guess my car has 19.xx lke Znod..as my car feels fast and not sluggish..
Old 01-30-2006, 01:42 PM
  #36  
Members
 
TV550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Don Juan' post='232109' date='Jan 30 2006, 02:01 PM
SHOOT! I have a BMW service appointment tomorrow morning for an SIB (service bulletin) for rough start in the mornings[b] what to do ? I can live without the upgrade because i have lived without it since I bough my car..so I guess my car has 19.xx lke Znod..as my car feels fast and not sluggish..
I am in the same situation I have an appointment in two days for the same thing. I might cancel the CIP20.01 waiting till last day to notify them in case you guys tell me otherwise. I can live with a slight rough idle but loosing more response in power would not be better.
Old 01-30-2006, 02:36 PM
  #37  
Contributors
 
subterFUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 545i (SMG) Titanium Gray Black Interior, Anthracite Trim M-tech kit Sport Package Premium Sound Satellite Radio Active Cruise Comfort Seats Navigation Folding rear seats
Default

Does this affect SMG equipped cars?

I have version 18.1 ..... should I keep it? I would enjoy the improved active steering, but I don't want to lose acceleration to get it.
Old 01-30-2006, 03:15 PM
  #38  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by grogan545' post='232048
SHOOT! I have a BMW service appointment tomorrow morning for an SIB (service bulletin) for rough start in the mornings[b] what to do ? I can live without the upgrade because i have lived without it since I bough my car..so I guess my car has 19.xx lke Znod..as my car feels fast and not sluggish..
Nice photo DJ. I wish there was some way to know what versions we have without updating. I can't begin to guess what you should do. I might live with it. At this point, I definitely would live without MP3, but something else would probably come up down the line that would require 20+. My car's transmitter died; that's why I was updated to 19.01.01. If you've looked at my data, at this point, my car is not slow, just slower.

Originally Posted by subterFUSE' post='232144' date='Jan 30 2006, 06:36 PM
Does this affect SMG equipped cars?

I have version 18.1 ..... should I keep it? I would enjoy the improved active steering, but I don't want to lose acceleration to get it.
I have no idea. The whole problem might be Step shifting. I haven't sorted out what is wrong yet and many never do so. Check out my last analytical post; it deals with the reasons that the problem may be at least partially Step related. Personally, I would hold off for a while if your problem is less AS. On the other hand, you AS may be so "lesser" that it is too annoying to put up with. Good luck whatever you decide.
Old 01-30-2006, 03:39 PM
  #39  
Contributors
 
EBMCS03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Default

Someone with an SMG go update and tell us what happens. I want to know but dont want to be the guinea pig.
Old 01-30-2006, 06:19 PM
  #40  
Contributors
 
CRRobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EBMCS03' post='232171' date='Jan 30 2006, 05:39 PM
Someone with an SMG go update and tell us what happens. I want to know but dont want to be the guinea pig.
Go for it Eric, or are you chicken.

Guess someone with SMG should test with device like Znod has before and after.


Quick Reply: Update on Performance Woes from 20.01.00



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM.