E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Update on Performance Woes from 20.01.00

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2006, 06:33 PM
  #11  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by grogan545' post='230786' date='Jan 27 2006, 10:15 PM
Now you have me really worried.There is no way I update to 20.01 until I am positve it will not affect performance.I can't believe a company that has built its reputation on performance would deliberatley detune our 545's.I thought maybe Znods numbers were just a fluke and would return to expected times soon,but with Lomag & others noticing a decrease in performance with 20.01 I believe it might be intentional change in the software.Possibly Znod is correct in that the DTC/DTS is not fully disengaged which would kill the low speed performance.I am anxious to here what the engineer has to say I am sure Znod will keep us meticulously informed.

I am also very impressed with your SA Znod.I would not have the confidence to approach my SA with my performance numbers.I just don't get the feeling my Dealer would look kindly on me showing him how many 0-80 runs I have made,and me complaining to him that I can't smoke the tires like I did with earlier software updates.
I was hoping that you would at least delay. We'll see what happens. I am positive that, at least from 19.01.01 on, that DSC and DTC do not fully disengage. I mentioned this matter earlier on the other thread--of course, before, getting 20+. Today, the shop foreman was very surprised when he found unexpectedly that DSC and DTS don't completely disengage with 20+ when he accelerated too quickly in M1 out of a turn. But, now if the problem is lack of complete disengagement, then the issue is a much more serious one. We shall see.

Note that my numbers might imply worse Step shiting from 1st to 2nd and better Step shifting from 2nd to 3rd. Also, note that the whole "loss" appears to have occurred by 60 MPH, but there is no way, at this point, to know what might happen from 80 MPH up (i.e., I have very limited data from 80 MPH up). I do notice a serious difference in the feeling of power right before the 1st to 2nd shift and, of course, off the line my car now is relatively dead.
Old 01-27-2006, 06:35 PM
  #12  
Senior Members
 
Bokke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any idea if this impacts those of us with 6 Speed's?

Cheers,
Old 01-27-2006, 06:49 PM
  #13  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by grogan545' post='230786' date='Jan 27 2006, 10:24 PM
Znod I just noticed that your acceleration rate from 0-10 with 20.01 is actually faster than before your update.This might mean that the DTC/DTS thing may not be the answer.All other acceleration rates are faster before 20.01.
The one run is faster to 10 MPH, but only on average. And, the difference is no wheel spin versus controlled wheel spin. Of course, I'd much rather have controlled fiercenes to 10 MPH, rather than full bore tameness, even if I always was behind .01 at 10 MPH. Some of my better runs had more wheel spin that I would have liked, but overall each of my better runs is way better than my new best (ugh!)
Old 01-27-2006, 07:04 PM
  #14  
Senior Members
 
grogan545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
Default

Originally Posted by Znod' post='230798
Znod I just noticed that your acceleration rate from 0-10 with 20.01 is actually faster than before your update.This might mean that the DTC/DTS thing may not be the answer.All other acceleration rates are faster before 20.01.
The one run is faster to 10 MPH, but only on average. And, the difference is no wheel spin versus controlled wheel spin. Of course, I'd much rather have controlled fiercenes to 10 MPH, rather than full bore tameness, even if I always was behind .01 at 10 MPH. Some of my better runs had more wheel spin that I would have liked, but overall each of my better runs is way better than my new best (ugh!)
[/quote]

I see what you mean,it definitley looks like you are down on power throughout the runs.The acceleration rates tell the story.the are all slower after 10 mph with 20.01.Very disapponting I hope relearning is the answer.I just don't remember complaints with previous updates about performance.I do remeber shift complaints after updates.Maybe if there were more GT2 users over the past year we could have verified that the actual acceleration was slower after updates until the computer relearned its settings.
Old 01-27-2006, 07:35 PM
  #15  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by Bokke' post='230791' date='Jan 27 2006, 10:35 PM
Any idea if this impacts those of us with 6 Speed's?

Cheers,
I wish I could help, but I don't have a clue. I wouldn't do the update without a good reason. I did it for MP3--which, after the fact, is not enough of a reason unless learning saves the day.
Old 01-27-2006, 07:49 PM
  #16  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by grogan545' post='230803' date='Jan 27 2006, 11:04 PM
I see what you mean,it definitley looks like you are down on power throughout the run.The acceleration rates tell the story.the are all slower after 10 mph with 20.01.Very disapponting I hope relearning is the answer.I just don't remember complaints with previous updates about performance.I do remeber shift complaints after updates.Maybe if there were more GT2 users over the past year we could have verified that the actual acceleration was slower after updates until the computer relearned its settings.
I have never seen these kind of complaints before, but, then, I haven't been around that long. Generally, people say good things about performance after updates, but I actually noticed the negative difference on the way home from the shop. Sometimes I wonder how objective the good things that I hear are; that's why I did not say anything negative until I had confirmed my "feelings" with the GT2. I definitely can feel .3 or .4 secs. difference--despite what some apparently think and say.
Old 01-27-2006, 09:21 PM
  #17  
Contributors
 
EBMCS03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Default

Znod... when you said you can brake the tires loose from a standstill before were you able to do that just by mashing on the gas or did you had to brake torque the car? Cuz on the old E39 540 that I've driven before I tried my hardest applying the gas as fast as i can and I was never able to break the rears loose without brake torquing...
Old 01-27-2006, 11:13 PM
  #18  
Contributors
 
wowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sweden Helsingborg
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: BMW 530i 05 M-technic Silvergrey whith beige dakotaleather
Default

Great details Znod. Keep us updated
Old 01-28-2006, 02:39 AM
  #19  
Senior Members
 
0700700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im not going to comment on this... but its great you have taken the time to do this
Old 01-28-2006, 03:40 AM
  #20  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by EBMCS03' post='230840' date='Jan 28 2006, 01:21 AM
Znod... when you said you can brake the tires loose from a standstill before were you able to do that just by mashing on the gas or did you had to brake torque the car? Cuz on the old E39 540 that I've driven before I tried my hardest applying the gas as fast as i can and I was never able to break the rears loose without brake torquing...
Lots of breaking loose by just applying the gas. I don't do brake torquing. But, incidentally, the shop foreman did it on my car. I asked if he thought that doing so can be a problem. He said, no, unless done too reptetitively.


Quick Reply: Update on Performance Woes from 20.01.00



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 AM.