This health care reform debate is crazy!
#271
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i, Sport and Premium package, Titanium Silver with Black Dakota Leather interior
[quote name='DRANGED' date='Aug 16 2009, 12:22 AM' post='977931']
One could have a high deductible catastrophic insurance policy for extended stays and emergencies. Rates would be low because the likelihood of such an event is low.
The problem is the general population has been accustomed to having everything covered 100% and having little to no copay. They want everything for free. This is like having car insurance to pay for oil changes and car washes. They all want to drive a BMW but pay for a Yugo.
As far as Dr's...You would be surprised. Have you ever spoke to a Dr. regarding paying them directly? Most are more than willing to take cash at a discounted rate.
One could have a high deductible catastrophic insurance policy for extended stays and emergencies. Rates would be low because the likelihood of such an event is low.
The problem is the general population has been accustomed to having everything covered 100% and having little to no copay. They want everything for free. This is like having car insurance to pay for oil changes and car washes. They all want to drive a BMW but pay for a Yugo.
As far as Dr's...You would be surprised. Have you ever spoke to a Dr. regarding paying them directly? Most are more than willing to take cash at a discounted rate.
#272
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MPLS, USA
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Originally Posted by pjinca' post='977999' date='Aug 16 2009, 12:28 AM
The problem is, how long the insurance company will keep sustaining care if you have, say, cancer? You know as well as I do - the second they think they will lose $$ covering you they will drop you like a hot stone.
I know many will be quick to draw the comparison that we are talking about human lives and not cars but the analogy is sound. You expect business to go into bankruptcy so that you do not? The point of business is profit.
Just an idea but maybe all medial insurance companies should be non-profit organizations instead. This would help reduce costs.
#273
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MPLS, USA
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
One could have a high deductible catastrophic insurance policy for extended stays and emergencies. Rates would be low because the likelihood of such an event is low.
The problem is the general population has been accustomed to having everything covered 100% and having little to no copay. They want everything for free. This is like having car insurance to pay for oil changes and car washes. They all want to drive a BMW but pay for a Yugo.
As far as Dr's...You would be surprised. Have you ever spoke to a Dr. regarding paying them directly? Most are more than willing to take cash at a discounted rate.
The problem is the general population has been accustomed to having everything covered 100% and having little to no copay. They want everything for free. This is like having car insurance to pay for oil changes and car washes. They all want to drive a BMW but pay for a Yugo.
As far as Dr's...You would be surprised. Have you ever spoke to a Dr. regarding paying them directly? Most are more than willing to take cash at a discounted rate.
roger, I have negotiated cash payment many times. In the immortal words of the Wu Tang Clan, Cash Rules Eveything Around Me
#274
Contributors
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 535i w/ Sports & Permium Pkg. Silv/Blk
2008 VW R32 w/Nav.
1992 VW Corrado Silv/Blk-retired
2001 530i Sports/Premium-retired
Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='977817' date='Aug 15 2009, 10:37 PM
Insurance should be abolished. Things were better when people payed for things themselves.
BTW Roger, Dr's will often quote you a reduced rate if you tell them you are paying out of pocket.
#275
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='978007' date='Aug 15 2009, 10:37 PM
Insurance is a business. If you continue to total your cars does your insurance not drop you? The more risk you present, the higher rates you pay. Such should be the same with medical insurance. If you are a higher risk, you're cost should be higher. Such practices in medical insurance though are deemed discriminitory. Hell, if your credit is bad you pay a higher rate for car insurance.
I know many will be quick to draw the comparison that we are talking about human lives and not cars but the analogy is sound. You expect business to go into bankruptcy so that you do not? The point of business is profit.
Just an idea but maybe all medial insurance companies should be non-profit organizations instead. This would help reduce costs.
I know many will be quick to draw the comparison that we are talking about human lives and not cars but the analogy is sound. You expect business to go into bankruptcy so that you do not? The point of business is profit.
Just an idea but maybe all medial insurance companies should be non-profit organizations instead. This would help reduce costs.
#276
Contributors
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='978007' date='Aug 15 2009, 10:37 PM
Insurance is a business. If you continue to total your cars does your insurance not drop you? The more risk you present, the higher rates you pay. Such should be the same with medical insurance. If you are a higher risk, you're cost should be higher. Such practices in medical insurance though are deemed discriminitory. Hell, if your credit is bad you pay a higher rate for car insurance.
I know many will be quick to draw the comparison that we are talking about human lives and not cars but the analogy is sound. You expect business to go into bankruptcy so that you do not? The point of business is profit.
Just an idea but maybe all medial insurance companies should be non-profit organizations instead. This would help reduce costs.
I know many will be quick to draw the comparison that we are talking about human lives and not cars but the analogy is sound. You expect business to go into bankruptcy so that you do not? The point of business is profit.
Just an idea but maybe all medial insurance companies should be non-profit organizations instead. This would help reduce costs.
There is no better argument for a Gov't option than taking the health decisions out of the hands of board members and putting them back in doctors hands
#277
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MPLS, USA
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Originally Posted by MiamiPhill' post='978013' date='Aug 16 2009, 12:41 AM
Ok, so I'll assume you misspoke here.........Anyway flesh out this HSA for me, I have given it a lot of thought & have ideas on it but you first.....how would you want it to look.?
There are far too many special interests at work in gov't. For proof of that, one need only look to the current proposed plan and exemption of Unions from the public option roles.
Why does congress have privatized health care if public health care is the cats meow? I think you will find, under examination of the plan, congress and the president exempt from the gov't roles as well.
#278
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MPLS, USA
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Originally Posted by pjinca' post='978016' date='Aug 16 2009, 12:43 AM
Now THAT's an idea. A corporation should NOT be deciding whether grandma lives or not. The right wing likes to throw the "death panels" term around and yet they already exist, we just call them board rooms. In any other situation we frown on people profiting from pain and misery, but somehow this practice is accepted in the insurance industry.
There is no better argument for a Gov't option than taking the health decisions out of the hands of board members and putting them back in doctors hands
There is no better argument for a Gov't option than taking the health decisions out of the hands of board members and putting them back in doctors hands
#279
Contributors
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='978019' date='Aug 15 2009, 10:47 PM
Yeah, perhaps non-profit insurance companies are the answer? Who knows? I don't pretend to have all the answers but I do not think that gov't is the answer. I believe putting ones trust in gov't is a recipe for disaster. As I have said in previous posts, all one need do is look to medicare, medicaid, social security and public schools for proof.
There are far too many special interests at work in gov't. For proof of that, one need only look to the current proposed plan and exemption of Unions from the public option roles.
There are far too many special interests at work in gov't. For proof of that, one need only look to the current proposed plan and exemption of Unions from the public option roles.
Well, how about this:
A "healthcare trust fund", such as Social Security was set up to be (it wasn't incorporated into the budget until Kennedy - thank you JFK - prick). The gov't can't touch it, but everyone and their employer contributes and should something happen it is deducted from here. This could reduce costs, eliminate insurers, and give the docs and nurses caring for the patient the ability to care for the person as needed.
No matter what we come up with, preventative care MUST be a big piece of it. Excercise, regular check ups, better nutrition, encouraging people to drink, eat, and do anything else in moderation. Face it we are a gluttonous society and this needs to be part of the remedy.
#280
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='978019' date='Aug 15 2009, 10:47 PM
Yeah, perhaps non-profit insurance companies are the answer? Who knows? I don't pretend to have all the answers but I do not think that gov't is the answer. I believe putting ones trust in gov't is a recipe for disaster. As I have said in previous posts, all one need do is look to medicare, medicaid, social security and public schools for proof.
There are far too many special interests at work in gov't. For proof of that, one need only look to the current proposed plan and exemption of Unions from the public option roles.
There are far too many special interests at work in gov't. For proof of that, one need only look to the current proposed plan and exemption of Unions from the public option roles.
As it stands today, every child must attend school, and the local district is obligated to provide a place. If, however, the parents choose, they can either home-school or take their kids private. Either way, taxes fund the public option and you pay whether or not you choose to consume, but you always have the ability to pay for a private option if that's your preference. The availability of the public option maintains pressure on private providers to provide extra value.
It's essentially how the public healthcare model could (and probably will) operate.
The core difference, however, is that while the law demands every child must go to school (and all of us pay the same tax burden, irrespective of whether our kids are publicly or privately educated) it makes no such demands in relation to healthcare. That's what I feel is wrong. As I've posted before, a public option, with the ability for those who want to do something different to maintain that choice, has to be a very viable option.