Revisiting charcoal filter removal
Thread Starter
Senior Members
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: Carlsbad, California
My Ride: 2007 BMW 550i Sport Pkg, 6MT
I removed mine but now I have concerns:
First let's look at this: http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2...5CPR/index.php Basically 05 Mustang GT would run lean if carbon filter is removed.
My concern is the Engine Management System. This system/software could be US specific, customized to accommodate an additional charcoal filter (that means reduced air flow) in the air intake system and it may not be able to handle this much more air (after this filter is removed) and eventually result in lean condition long term. This could have ill effect on engine and performance. This could also void warranty.
I am thinking putting it back.
First let's look at this: http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2...5CPR/index.php Basically 05 Mustang GT would run lean if carbon filter is removed.
My concern is the Engine Management System. This system/software could be US specific, customized to accommodate an additional charcoal filter (that means reduced air flow) in the air intake system and it may not be able to handle this much more air (after this filter is removed) and eventually result in lean condition long term. This could have ill effect on engine and performance. This could also void warranty.
I am thinking putting it back.
I don't believe there are any adverse effects of moving this filter because Dinan removed this filter in their CAI without needing adjustments to the ECU. If you think about it, most CAIs are producing more airflow to increase power output and they do so without a remap to fuel mixture. Of course, I'm not saying that aftermarket upgrades don't sometime adversely affect engine longevity but since Dinan has a warranty for their CAI that matches BMW's warranty as well as consequential damages caused by the upgrade, I feel safe with it.
Then again, who knows....
Then again, who knows....
Senior Members
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
My Ride: 2004 545i - 6 speed manual (July 04 build), silver-grey/black, sports package std equipment (18", active roll, active steering, adaptive headlights), premium sound, bluetooth enabled, folding rear seat, lumbar, 3m hood/bumper protective film, rear tint, euro reflectors.
Originally Posted by EuroCarFan' post='235951' date='Feb 6 2006, 06:18 PM
I don't believe there are any adverse effects of moving this filter because Dinan removed this filter in their CAI without needing adjustments to the ECU. If you think about it, most CAIs are producing more airflow to increase power output and they do so without a remap to fuel mixture. Of course, I'm not saying that aftermarket upgrades don't sometime adversely affect engine longevity but since Dinan has a warranty for their CAI that matches BMW's warranty as well as consequential damages caused by the upgrade, I feel safe with it.
Then again, who knows....
Then again, who knows....
Is this one of the reasons the Dinan CAI produces so much added HP?
Is the Valvtronic more sensative dirt in the air?
I can understand where the manufacturers do things to the exhaust/intake for noise restrictions, but why would they limit the air if this was not necessary for some reason.
I would feel better about it if they said it was required for high dust areas or something like that.
Senior Members
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
My Ride: 2004 545i - 6 speed manual (July 04 build), silver-grey/black, sports package std equipment (18", active roll, active steering, adaptive headlights), premium sound, bluetooth enabled, folding rear seat, lumbar, 3m hood/bumper protective film, rear tint, euro reflectors.
I don't believe there are any adverse effects of moving this filter because Dinan removed this filter in their CAI without needing adjustments to the ECU. If you think about it, most CAIs are producing more airflow to increase power output and they do so without a remap to fuel mixture. Of course, I'm not saying that aftermarket upgrades don't sometime adversely affect engine longevity but since Dinan has a warranty for their CAI that matches BMW's warranty as well as consequential damages caused by the upgrade, I feel safe with it.
Then again, who knows....
Then again, who knows....
Is this one of the reasons the Dinan CAI produces so much added HP?
Is the Valvtronic more sensative dirt in the air?
I can understand where the manufacturers do things to the exhaust/intake for noise restrictions, but why would they limit the air if this was not necessary for some reason.
I would feel better about it if they said it was required for high dust areas or something like that.
[/quote]
ok - what an idiot. I just read the initial post and saw the reasons - Emissions.
I agree with you. You are justing giving the engine a little less restriction and more air like the Dinan CAI. The ECU should compensate for it without a problem.
I doubt it would affect the engine mixtures. If you are worried about it, take a plug out and clean it. Then run it for 10k and take a look at the plug. It would tell you if the engine was running too lean. Or just have BMW or your tech check it in 10k miles.
I don't remember, can you even see the plugs on this beast?
I am sure this is one of the reasons contributing to the hp increase for the Dinan CAI but I don't think it's the primary reason. The Dinan CAI has two air intake tubes feeding the air box one of which feeds air from right behind the front grill and I think the extra intake tube contributes more to the hp gain.
Senior Members
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
My Ride: 2004 545i - 6 speed manual (July 04 build), silver-grey/black, sports package std equipment (18", active roll, active steering, adaptive headlights), premium sound, bluetooth enabled, folding rear seat, lumbar, 3m hood/bumper protective film, rear tint, euro reflectors.
I really should read everything before I respond - but looked at the Mustang article. That is very strange. Basically the ECU's add fuel based on the amount of air that is let in. The more you open the butterfly, the more air, the more fuel. It should compensate to added air within reason.
It does not make sense that Ford would have this problem, but my gut tells me that it would not be a problem as Dinan has basically gone one step further than just removing the carbon filter.
It does not make sense that Ford would have this problem, but my gut tells me that it would not be a problem as Dinan has basically gone one step further than just removing the carbon filter.
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by hmc' post='235933' date='Feb 6 2006, 08:20 PM
I removed mine but now I have concern.
I am thinking putting it back.
I am thinking putting it back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dynodave
E61 Touring Discussion
0
Apr 20, 2015 12:23 AM



