2009 Cadillac CTS-V
#21
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 17,310
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: G30 M550i
Model Year: 2018
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by pukka' post='515860' date='Jan 10 2008, 03:18 AM
I spent a good chunk of my younger years playing PC games, so learning how operate something with a bunch of buttons isn't too difficult
. If anybody hasn't noticed, the E60 has approx 50 different buttons (not counting the iDrive), 5 knobs, and 3 levers within reach of the driver (yes - I actually went out and counted after reading this thread). It think it is not fair to judge an interior design without actually sitting in the car.
Touch screen LCD's can work well, but the LCD should be built into the dash (shorter reach) instead of a pop-up version which besides many other things, can partially block the drivers view of the road.
The only thing I really don't like about this car (and all Caddy's) is the "edgy" design.
![Happy](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/happy.gif)
Touch screen LCD's can work well, but the LCD should be built into the dash (shorter reach) instead of a pop-up version which besides many other things, can partially block the drivers view of the road.
The only thing I really don't like about this car (and all Caddy's) is the "edgy" design.
#22
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Rudy' post='515880' date='Jan 10 2008, 04:00 AM
The prospect of learning how to use something with an abundance of buttons is not my issue with the interior of the Cadillac. I, too, can figure out how to work just about anything with as many buttons as you can throw at me. It's not about a button count where less buttons is more desirable, it's about how and when a button is used. In other words, is there an elegant interface or a unneccessarily complex interface? To me, the Caddy looks way more complicated than it has to be, especially considering that on top of all those buttons, there's a touch screen interface to additional functions, etc. Sure, I could eventually figure it out but that doesn't mean I'd enjoy using it...
By nature, most of us like to "push buttons." Look at any toddler.
![Big Grin](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/biggrin.gif)
![Whistling](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/whistling.gif)
There are luxury look like, "Look, I'm sophisticated and luxuries with all the buttons and shine." Then there are the designer look, "Simple and elegant."
#23
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 17,310
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: G30 M550i
Model Year: 2018
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bimmer32' post='515942' date='Jan 10 2008, 09:44 AM
This is a matter of preference. Anybody will get use to either design philosophy in a matter of weeks if they actually own the car. What may be convenience to one person is not for another person.
By nature, most of us like to "push buttons." Look at any toddler.
Some of us just like a more simplified look . . . sort of like a sleeper car look. OK, I'm starting to be bias . . .
There are luxury look like, "Look, I'm sophisticated and luxuries with all the buttons and shine." Then there are the designer look, "Simple and elegant."
By nature, most of us like to "push buttons." Look at any toddler.
![Big Grin](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/biggrin.gif)
![Whistling](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/whistling.gif)
There are luxury look like, "Look, I'm sophisticated and luxuries with all the buttons and shine." Then there are the designer look, "Simple and elegant."
When I was a toddler (and beyond), I liked to push buttons too. Now that I've had prolonged exposure to the alternative to buttons, I realize that buttons aren't always a good thing. My belief is that there are many people out there that would agree with me but only after they've had some quality time with an iDrive type interface. The problem is that many of these people aren't willing to give an iDrive type interface a try because of the bashing it's received by the media and by sales representatives of the competition. It's a shame because these people are missing out on something that might actually end up changing the way they view these sorts of things, etc...
#24
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Certainly not to the same level, but do you guys think this interior shares some similarities with the CTS-V?
![](https://img167.imageshack.us/img167/9969/dbsps3.jpg)
![](https://img126.imageshack.us/img126/4380/dbs2qb1.jpg)
Here's the caddy again for comparison. It might not be the greatest, but I'm honestly impressed, especially for an American car.
![](https://img167.imageshack.us/img167/9969/dbsps3.jpg)
![](https://img126.imageshack.us/img126/4380/dbs2qb1.jpg)
Here's the caddy again for comparison. It might not be the greatest, but I'm honestly impressed, especially for an American car.
![](https://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8313/2009cadillacctsv3dt8.jpg)
#25
Contributors
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC , Canada
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2011, X6 Hybrid . Alpine White , every option. 20" Conti' NON runflats,OEM trunk spoiler , LUX V3 AE's , HP Thunder Fogs , custom front bumper reflector delete........
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Todays buttons and touch screens in the Caddies were like Corinthian leather in the old Chryslers , ......................lipstick for the unwashed masses! ....................some "buyers" like junked up cars and never get the "Less is More" or understated refinement of a BMW. As mentioned above the car will have measureable handling and performance specs that are close to BMW, good for the engineers !........... But the marketing guys just could'nt resist to throw all the junk in ........! :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:
#26
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I seriously considered the previous CTS-V, but the interior was a major weakness. The new interior is so much better you really can't compare.The new one has taken the mesh thing a little too far for my taste. I think the base price is going to be about $60K though -- up from about $52K when I was looking.
Rudy - don't assume GM is not doing focus groups with the right people. They have been putting a lot of effort into researching what buyers expect/prefer for each vehicle segment (against the top competition). The improvements are starting to show acorss the board -- CTS, Malibu, full size trucks, Corvette updates... You are right that the competition is not sitting still and GM has a long, long way to go, but their rate of gap closure has been pretty good lately.
GM's reputation (while largely deserved in the past) is holding them back more than their products right now. My wife has leased 2 SRX's and very likely to get a third. She has been very pleased with them. Nice size and she feels comfortable in it. Dealer is a block from her office. While I don't care for the interior, the exterior is not bad with the crisp styling and I think it has held up pretty well (not looking too dated for how long it has been out). Handling is pretty good for a crossover.
Rudy - don't assume GM is not doing focus groups with the right people. They have been putting a lot of effort into researching what buyers expect/prefer for each vehicle segment (against the top competition). The improvements are starting to show acorss the board -- CTS, Malibu, full size trucks, Corvette updates... You are right that the competition is not sitting still and GM has a long, long way to go, but their rate of gap closure has been pretty good lately.
GM's reputation (while largely deserved in the past) is holding them back more than their products right now. My wife has leased 2 SRX's and very likely to get a third. She has been very pleased with them. Nice size and she feels comfortable in it. Dealer is a block from her office. While I don't care for the interior, the exterior is not bad with the crisp styling and I think it has held up pretty well (not looking too dated for how long it has been out). Handling is pretty good for a crossover.
#27
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 17,310
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: G30 M550i
Model Year: 2018
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JPJ' post='516228' date='Jan 10 2008, 10:03 PM
Rudy - don't assume GM is not doing focus groups with the right people. They have been putting a lot of effort into researching what buyers expect/prefer for each vehicle segment (against the top competition). The improvements are starting to show acorss the board -- CTS, Malibu, full size trucks, Corvette updates... You are right that the competition is not sitting still and GM has a long, long way to go, but their rate of gap closure has been pretty good lately.
I've had the opportunity to use both for years (wife's Odyssey has a huge touch screen for just about everything) and I fully understand the perceived simplicity that the touch screen provides. You can easily see what to press, etc, for many functions so "Joe six-pack" immediately says, "I want that in my car because I can figure it out." What J6P doesn't see, is how much more efficient and safe an iDrive type system is because he's either read about how bad it is or he's played with one for a few minutes in a showroom or on a test drive. As we see from the members of the forum, just about everyone says that iDrive is great once you spend some time with it.
As far as safety's concerned, with a touch screen, it has to be located closer to the driver and since there's no tactile feedback on the "buttons," you constantly have to take your eyes off of the road to see what you're doing. Also, in my experiences, touch screens do not have as clear of an image in all lighting conditions. As we all know, these issues simply vanish with an iDrive style interface. Clearly, the Germans get it which is why you don't see touch screens on BMW, M-B, Audi, etc.
(Oh yeah, and don't get me started on the smudges and fingerprints...
![Wink](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/wink.gif)
#28
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Rudy' post='515489' date='Jan 9 2008, 07:52 AM
I get both dizzy and nauseous when looking at this picture...
Attachment 42692
No doubt that in addition to all those buttons, that LCD is a touch screen...![Nono](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/nono.gif)
![Barf](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/barf.gif)
No doubt that in addition to all those buttons, that LCD is a touch screen...
![Nono](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/nono.gif)
#29
Contributors
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FLA - East Coast, USA
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Rudy' post='516242' date='Jan 10 2008, 11:14 PM
As far as safety's concerned, with a touch screen, it has to be located closer to the driver and since there's no tactile feedback on the "buttons," you constantly have to take your eyes off of the road to see what you're doing. Also, in my experiences, touch screens do not have as clear of an image in all lighting conditions. As we all know, these issues simply vanish with an iDrive style interface. Clearly, the Germans get it which is why you don't see touch screens on BMW, M-B, Audi, etc.
(Oh yeah, and don't get me started on the smudges and fingerprints...
)
(Oh yeah, and don't get me started on the smudges and fingerprints...
![Wink](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/wink.gif)
I have used touch screens in one form ( sometimes with a light pen in the early days) or another since '86 trying to launch rockets, track satellites, or find submarines. When all I had to look at was the screen itself, then yes, touch screen was ok. But as soon as my attention had to be elsewhere the touch screen lost out in usefulness to buttons. I spent several years with various engineering departments trying to get them to understand "operations" and set requirements for console operator layouts. Using switches (buttons) and/or track balls in a proper design allows for eys off operation by touch and tactile feedback. Augmented by Voice Recognition makes it even better. I recently had to rent large SUV and drive in unfamiliar areas. I used a portable NAV system that used touch screen - arrg. Most distracting thing and had a couple of near misses.
#30
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 17,310
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: G30 M550i
Model Year: 2018
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by cobradav' post='516334' date='Jan 11 2008, 08:38 AM
+1.
I have used touch screens in one form ( sometimes with a light pen in the early days) or another since '86 trying to launch rockets, track satellites, or find submarines. When all I had to look at was the screen itself, then yes, touch screen was ok. But as soon as my attention had to be elsewhere the touch screen lost out in usefulness to buttons. I spent several years with various engineering departments trying to get them to understand "operations" and set requirements for console operator layouts. Using switches (buttons) and/or track balls in a proper design allows for eys off operation by touch and tactile feedback. Augmented by Voice Recognition makes it even better. I recently had to rent large SUV and drive in unfamiliar areas. I used a portable NAV system that used touch screen - arrg. Most distracting thing and had a couple of near misses.
I have used touch screens in one form ( sometimes with a light pen in the early days) or another since '86 trying to launch rockets, track satellites, or find submarines. When all I had to look at was the screen itself, then yes, touch screen was ok. But as soon as my attention had to be elsewhere the touch screen lost out in usefulness to buttons. I spent several years with various engineering departments trying to get them to understand "operations" and set requirements for console operator layouts. Using switches (buttons) and/or track balls in a proper design allows for eys off operation by touch and tactile feedback. Augmented by Voice Recognition makes it even better. I recently had to rent large SUV and drive in unfamiliar areas. I used a portable NAV system that used touch screen - arrg. Most distracting thing and had a couple of near misses.
![Thumbsup](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/thumbsup.gif)