Our Fearless Forecasts
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
I did some more matched-pairs t-tests. Below are my test results and predictions, given the results, about how our rankings will be affected after the final data set, the data from RT, is in.
1. For 30 matched pairs, the 0-60 means for CD, MT an RT were 4.620, 4.729, and 4.727, respectively.
a. Null: MT mean <= CD mean/rejected at 0.008 level. Thus, accept MT mean > CD mean.
b. Null: RT mean <= CD mean. Can't reject. Thus, can't conclude RT mean > CD mean.
c. Null: MT mean <= RT mean/rejected at the 0.08 level. Thus, accept RT mean > MT mean cautiously.
Observations/Prediction:
i. a implies that the MT M5 time > CD M5 time which is true. MT time = 4.5, and CD time = 4.2..
ii. b implies that I have no basis to predict that the RT M5 time will be > CD M5 time = 4.2.
iii. c implies that RT M5 time will be > than the MT time = 4.5
Prediction: Those predicting relatively high M5 0-60 times will improve or hold their positions.
2. For 30 matched pairs, the 1/4 ET means for C&D, MT, and R&T were 13.073, 13.013, and 13.128, respectively.
a. Null: MT mean >= CD mean/rejected at 0.08 level. Thus, cautiously accept MT mean < CD mean.
b. Null: RT mean <= CD mean. Can't rejected. Thus, can't conclude RT mean > CD mean.
c. Null: RT mean <= MT mean/rejected at the 0.08 level. Thus, accept RT mean > MT mean cautiously.
Observations/Prediction:
i. a implies that the MT M5 time < CD M5 time which is not true. MT time = 12.9, and CD time = 12.5.
ii. b implies that I have no basis to predict that the RT M5 time will be > CD M5 time = 4.2.
iii. c implies that RT M5 time will be > than the MT time = 12.9
Prediction: Those predicting relatively high M5 1/4 times will improve or hold their positions,
but the evidence is not without problem.
3. For 20 matched pairs, no speed mean difference was significant (C&D mean = 112; MT mean = 112.3; R&T Mean = 111.8)..
Observations/Prediction:
Prediction: The analysis provides no basis for a prediction. However, already existing RT data for an Euro M5 contain a 1/4 speed of 115.8 . So, given the MT result of 114.9, I predict that those predicting relatively low M5 1/4 mile speeds will improve or hold their positions.
1. For 30 matched pairs, the 0-60 means for CD, MT an RT were 4.620, 4.729, and 4.727, respectively.
a. Null: MT mean <= CD mean/rejected at 0.008 level. Thus, accept MT mean > CD mean.
b. Null: RT mean <= CD mean. Can't reject. Thus, can't conclude RT mean > CD mean.
c. Null: MT mean <= RT mean/rejected at the 0.08 level. Thus, accept RT mean > MT mean cautiously.
Observations/Prediction:
i. a implies that the MT M5 time > CD M5 time which is true. MT time = 4.5, and CD time = 4.2..
ii. b implies that I have no basis to predict that the RT M5 time will be > CD M5 time = 4.2.
iii. c implies that RT M5 time will be > than the MT time = 4.5
Prediction: Those predicting relatively high M5 0-60 times will improve or hold their positions.
2. For 30 matched pairs, the 1/4 ET means for C&D, MT, and R&T were 13.073, 13.013, and 13.128, respectively.
a. Null: MT mean >= CD mean/rejected at 0.08 level. Thus, cautiously accept MT mean < CD mean.
b. Null: RT mean <= CD mean. Can't rejected. Thus, can't conclude RT mean > CD mean.
c. Null: RT mean <= MT mean/rejected at the 0.08 level. Thus, accept RT mean > MT mean cautiously.
Observations/Prediction:
i. a implies that the MT M5 time < CD M5 time which is not true. MT time = 12.9, and CD time = 12.5.
ii. b implies that I have no basis to predict that the RT M5 time will be > CD M5 time = 4.2.
iii. c implies that RT M5 time will be > than the MT time = 12.9
Prediction: Those predicting relatively high M5 1/4 times will improve or hold their positions,
but the evidence is not without problem.
3. For 20 matched pairs, no speed mean difference was significant (C&D mean = 112; MT mean = 112.3; R&T Mean = 111.8)..
Observations/Prediction:
Prediction: The analysis provides no basis for a prediction. However, already existing RT data for an Euro M5 contain a 1/4 speed of 115.8 . So, given the MT result of 114.9, I predict that those predicting relatively low M5 1/4 mile speeds will improve or hold their positions.
Members
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Cambridgeshire, UK
My Ride: 525d se auto. black sapphire, 17" 5 spoke 138 style alloys. dark poplar trim, charcoal flat weave cloth, bluetooth phone prep, dimming rear view and side mirrors, lumbar support, heated front deats, phone cradle
a radical isnt what u call a production car lol, its a stripped out back to basic track car, which you can use on the road... see picture below to see what i mean 'basic' LOL
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
"Here are some new M5 data from the 3/06 MT. I have re-done some of what is above. I will be updating our leaderboard soon.
0-60 4.5
1/4th time 12.9
1/4th speed 114.9"
Znod, Do you have a link to the above data? I search MT's website and did not find anything but estimates.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/..._mb/index7.html
Please verify.
0-60 4.5
1/4th time 12.9
1/4th speed 114.9"
Znod, Do you have a link to the above data? I search MT's website and did not find anything but estimates.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/..._mb/index7.html
Please verify.
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by Bimmer32' post='236233' date='Feb 7 2006, 01:15 PM
Please verify.
I quess MT not does have the data for the 3/06 issue online yet. The estimates, of course, have been there a long time.
Senior Members
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: friscoo,CA -----> jakarta,indonesia
My Ride: '04 BMW E60 530 black/black
'05 Porsche Cayene S Black/gold
05' BMW M5
05' Bentley CGT
Whats happening guys???
WOW havent been here a long time?So hows everybody doing?
cant believe ive drop to the third place!! :'(
WOW havent been here a long time?So hows everybody doing?
cant believe ive drop to the third place!! :'(
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by m5lover' post='252172' date='Mar 9 2006, 01:36 PM
Whats happening guys???
WOW havent been here a long time?So hows everybody doing?
cant believe ive drop to the third place!! :'(
WOW havent been here a long time?So hows everybody doing?
cant believe ive drop to the third place!! :'(
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Hi All:
Well, I know we all are eagerly awaiting the MT results for the M5.
In the interim, we can at least celebrate the CD 7/06 M6 results.
0 to 60--4.1
1/4 ET--12.4
1/4 TV--121
Drive Train--"7 speed manual with automated shifting and clutch"
Rear Gear--3.62 LSD
Price as Tested--$106,390
Looks--Georgeous
I want one.
Well, I know we all are eagerly awaiting the MT results for the M5.
In the interim, we can at least celebrate the CD 7/06 M6 results.0 to 60--4.1
1/4 ET--12.4
1/4 TV--121
Drive Train--"7 speed manual with automated shifting and clutch"
Rear Gear--3.62 LSD
Price as Tested--$106,390
Looks--Georgeous
I want one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rudy
E60 Discussion
0
Jun 30, 2009 08:36 PM
JSpira
E60 Discussion
21
Mar 16, 2008 04:16 PM



