E60 M5 Discussion The almighty M5. Have you seen one today?

cls 55 amg beating an m5 from start

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #1  
0700700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Members
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
From: sofia / london
Default

FLAME ME

cls55 amg beating m5

http://www.uae143.com/data/515/5CLS55vsM5_NEW.wmv


also sl65 amg beating m5

http://www.uae143.com/data/515/47SL65vsM5.wmv


another run cls 55 amg m5

http://www.uae143.com/data/515/47cls55_m5_NEW.wmv
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
Alex.br's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
From: Brazil
My Ride: 2007 E60 M5
Default

Originally Posted by 700700' post='222758' date='Jan 11 2006, 02:58 PM

Same videos ...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #3  
0700700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Members
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
From: sofia / london
Default

Originally Posted by Alex.br' post='222761

Same videos ...
[/quote]


ooops ! one moment please.. done


that should teach people to compare cars like for like, the cls has a better tuned gearbox, a quicker
steering rack and is lighter
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #4  
dude_in_germany's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Germany
My Ride: 130i, 265 HP, just serious extras
Default

Looks like a underwater race
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #5  
cidair's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Default

" that should teach people to compare cars like for like, the cls has a better tuned gearbox, a quicker
steering rack and is lighter "

Please explain....?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #6  
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
From: Bucharest, Romania
Default

I saw a video on best motoring comparing m5 and cls55 amg and so it seems that the cls is a bit quicker at 1/4 mile. They tested both cars with traction control and without and in both cases the cls was faster. I would want to see a race between M5 and cls 55 amg but m5 giving it's full potential (european launch control).

About the SL65 AMG video i'm not surprised. That SL is a moster. With a chip and exhaust i saw SL 65 doing 11,4 sec at 1/4 mile.

Best Motoring - 2006-01 [Sugo Battle][M5.CLS55.M3CSL.Gallardo.997S.R34.XJR]

That's the file name. You can download it from mininova.com at tv shows/uk.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #7  
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
From: Bucharest, Romania
Default

It has 777 mega so it's quite big.
I want to make a few drawbacks. The CLS won only in automatic mode.. (reviewed the movie)

1/4 times in automatic:
CLS 55 AMG ON 12,901 OFF 12,752
BMW M5 ON 13,480 OFF 13,074.
The times where in automatic mode in mode sport or the sportiest.

In SMG mode: 13,174 for mb and 13,144 for bmw.
I don't think bmw used launch control at this run though.

Other than that the m5 won at:
-braking: in shorter distance and with more G's on braking (over 1,02 G at all runs).
-slalom: cls 17,404 sec / m5 15,451 sec.

Also on a track with time sectors here's how the m5 handled against an m3 csl and a porsche 997 carrera s.

total lap time / split 1 / split 2 / speed
Porsche:
1,41,419 / 16,059 / 24,604 / 206,1 km/h
M3 CSL:
15,743 / 24,728 / 204,2 km/h
M5:
16,120 / 25,072 / 216,4 km/h
(the total lap time for the cls and m5 is not given).

Then they had a race typical for best motoring: M5, 997 carrera s, csl, gt-r and galliardo.
The most important thing is that the galliardo won on the final lap at photo finish, m3 and m5 following it. So funny how the csl tryed to overtake the m5 but couldn't do it because although the csl was faster aroudn corners while m5 was litteraly drifting not to loose it's spot, then the m5 kept detaching on the straights as it was more powerfull and better gearbox. Then the csl caught it again aroudn corners and againg lost on straights. IT was a dead even.

THIS TEST WAS TAKEN IN PROFFESIONAL RACING CONDITIONS, BY PROFFESIONAL RACIND RIVERS, WITH PROFFESIONAL MEASURING GADGETS

It was more than conclusive in all perspectives at all cars. It was fun to watch although i didn't understand much from those japaneese comments.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
znod's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by 700700' post='222758' date='Jan 11 2006, 11:58 AM
No flames here. No problem with reporting on what happens--either way. No excuses; it's the way it was. But, I guess I could have said "yeah, but the M5 is about way more than ...."
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #9  
cobradav's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
From: FLA - East Coast, USA
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='222793' date='Jan 11 2006, 01:10 PM
It has 777 mega so it's quite big.
I want to make a few drawbacks. The CLS won only in automatic mode.. (reviewed the movie)

1/4 times in automatic:
CLS 55 AMG ON 12,901 OFF 12,752
BMW M5 ON 13,480 OFF 13,074.
The times where in automatic mode in mode sport or the sportiest.

In SMG mode: 13,174 for mb and 13,144 for bmw.
I don't think bmw used launch control at this run though.

Other than that the m5 won at:
-braking: in shorter distance and with more G's on braking (over 1,02 G at all runs).
-slalom: cls 17,404 sec / m5 15,451 sec.

Also on a track with time sectors here's how the m5 handled against an m3 csl and a porsche 997 carrera s.

total lap time / split 1 / split 2 / speed
Porsche:
1,41,419 / 16,059 / 24,604 / 206,1 km/h
M3 CSL:
15,743 / 24,728 / 204,2 km/h
M5:
16,120 / 25,072 / 216,4 km/h
(the total lap time for the cls and m5 is not given).

Then they had a race typical for best motoring: M5, 997 carrera s, csl, gt-r and galliardo.
The most important thing is that the galliardo won on the final lap at photo finish, m3 and m5 following it. So funny how the csl tryed to overtake the m5 but couldn't do it because although the csl was faster aroudn corners while m5 was litteraly drifting not to loose it's spot, then the m5 kept detaching on the straights as it was more powerfull and better gearbox. Then the csl caught it again aroudn corners and againg lost on straights. IT was a dead even.

THIS TEST WAS TAKEN IN PROFFESIONAL RACING CONDITIONS, BY PROFFESIONAL RACIND RIVERS, WITH PROFFESIONAL MEASURING GADGETS

It was more than conclusive in all perspectives at all cars. It was fun to watch although i didn't understand much from those japaneese comments.
Would appear LC makes big difference as recent R&T results using non US LC had 12.4 and 186.4km/h
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
Peter530i's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Prague, Czech Rep. - Europe
My Ride: 2004 BMW 530I steptronic, Orient Blue, Dakota Black Leather, Finishers Aluminium with Wave Cutting interior, NAVIgation, Radio PROFESSIONAL, CD in-dash, Hi-Fi extended sound system, PDC system, Bi-Xenons lights with washers, cruise-control, heated seats, Extended AC, auto"shade" mirrors, auto lights sensors, rain/wiper sensor, M-tech leather multifunction steering wheel, side airbags rearseats, sliding armrest, smoker's package (I don't smoke!), velour floor mats, spare wheel and jack, 122 style rims winter setup, M135 style rims summer setup [color=red]Mods:[/color] [color=blue]M tech sport steering wheel with M5 SMG paddles working retrofit done ! Trunk lid opening button retrofit done.[/color] [color=blue]3M window 35% tint done Chrome grilles E60.net Clings [/color]
Default

sad, very very sad
looks like Dubai's rich kids playing with toys
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM.