E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Higher fuel consumption with E60 compared to E39.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2006, 09:32 AM
  #11  
Senior Members
 
CVTBenhogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 BMW 550i "Ben Hogan's 5 Iron" SilverGrey/Black Sport, L7, NAV, CW, AS, Split FR 2003 Audi A4 3.0 CVT "Part of the Moniker" Silver/Ebony, Prem, CW, Star 17s
Default

Originally Posted by Bruggern' post='308532' date='Jul 9 2006, 11:31 AM
I have converted from a '99 523iA to a '04 525iA and I am a bit disappointed by the increased fuel consumption.
Comments anyone?

Your disappointed? Try a 550. I see the fuel needle moving left everytime the gas pedal gets stomped. A real fat pig in city driving. 17 mpg tops.

Not bad on highway though.

CVT Benhogan
Old 07-11-2006, 10:35 AM
  #12  
Members
Thread Starter
 
Bruggern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Norway - Europe
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 525iA, Black II, Bi-Xenon, Navigation Proffesional, PDC, servotronic, HiFi, voice recognition system, Riegel ahorn wood.
Default

It is correct as Ricracing says: from 170 hp 523i to 192hp 525i. But the E60 is only 5 kg lighter than the E39 (1500 kg vs. 1505 kg without the driver).

I don't understand why going from one pollution standard (Euro 3) to a newer (Euro 4) should give higher gas consumption and it is CO2 which is the big issue, isn't it? (except in US )

Well, it's disappointing, but it seems I have to live with it and pay the extra gas it needs
Old 07-11-2006, 01:53 PM
  #13  
Senior Members
 
BangleBox_530d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: E60 530d Sport - Carbon Black, Black Dakota Leather, Media Pack (satnav, bluetooth, CD changer), heated font seats, through load
Default

Why didn't you buy a diesel?
Old 07-11-2006, 01:54 PM
  #14  
Ian
Members
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NE UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 530D SE
Default

...and get 40mpg per tank
Old 06-12-2007, 03:32 PM
  #15  
Members
 
cheeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicagoland (USA)
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2007 650i, Black Sapphire Metallic, Black Dakota Leather, Sports Package, Cold Weather Package, Steptronic, Navigation, Logic7 sound system, ARS, PDC
Default

Originally Posted by Bruggern' post='308532' date='Jul 9 2006, 11:31 AM
On my 523iA I got typically 10.5 liters per 100 km (22.4 US mpg) with this kind of driving. This was what my computer told me - I never checked real consumption on the E39. On the E60 525iA the computer tells me typically 12.0 liters per 100 km (19.6 US mpg). And actually when I checked last week the real consumption was even higher (12.4 l/100km = 19.0 mpg). That's high, isn't it? :thumbsdown:

Comments anyone?
Same here, i typically got around 21 US mpg on my 530i E39 but my 530i E60 gets me only 16 to 18 US mpg at best , even after the software upgrade. Also do you feel the E39 was way more responsive on the throttle and felt like there was still a lot of juice to go? my E60 lags along and then kicks in after some time and just flattens out..... i just don't get it
Old 06-18-2007, 01:41 AM
  #16  
Senior Members
 
big_ipaq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Romania
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cheeks' post='435119' date='Jun 13 2007, 02:32 AM
[...] Also do you feel the E39 was way more responsive on the throttle and felt like there was still a lot of juice to go? my E60 lags along and then kicks in after some time and just flattens out..... i just don't get it
I feel the same... I guess transmission is also part of it. I compared my E60 530i steptronic with E90 330i steptronic. While the engines are different, M54B30 vs. N52B30, and power differs, 231 HP vs. 258 HP, the engine in E90 is MUCH more lively and responsive when accelerating. Big difference.
Old 06-18-2007, 01:53 AM
  #17  
Senior Members
 
aybeesea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cheeks' post='435119' date='Jun 13 2007, 12:32 AM
Same here...
I wonder whether the OP is still here after a year?

ABC
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bazza
Other BMW Models
3
12-16-2003 02:55 PM
mrbelk
E60 Discussion
10
10-29-2003 10:08 AM
ZeZe
E60 Discussion
0
10-15-2003 12:58 PM
Litster
Dealer Purchasing & Service Forum
2
08-12-2003 11:41 AM
Beemer
E60 Discussion
7
07-09-2003 05:38 PM



Quick Reply: Higher fuel consumption with E60 compared to E39.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.