E39 M5 vs E60 550 performace is very close if not the same
02-09-2006, 08:28 PM
#11
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by swajames' post='237683' date='Feb 10 2006, 05:02 AM
You're clearly (or conveniently) forgetting that the 545 has been timed at not that much over 5, the 550 is going to be quicker still. Haven't seen any serious 550 tests yet, but either way it will be close.
02-09-2006, 08:55 PM
#12
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.supercars.net/cars/179.html
for specs 0-60 in 4.8seconds and this is the BMW time ...
for the 550i the bmw time is 5.5 ??
for specs 0-60 in 4.8seconds and this is the BMW time ...
for the 550i the bmw time is 5.5 ??
02-09-2006, 11:32 PM
#13
Senior Members
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The M5 will win in the end. But it will be such a close race. VERY VERY CLOSE.
I for one pick the 550i and with some mods you can easiliy get the same hp numbers as the m5.
I for one pick the 550i and with some mods you can easiliy get the same hp numbers as the m5.
02-09-2006, 11:51 PM
#14
Senior Members
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: BROOKLYN,NY USA
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: E60 "Stripper"
Now C6 "Stripper"
Our brother Wolverine has been saying this since day one, now that he's got an E60 M5...maybe he can race someone with an E39 M5 locally in Ohio for fun and some stats? 
Don Juan have you invited anybody with an E39 M5 to race you?
Don Juan have you invited anybody with an E39 M5 to race you?
02-10-2006, 12:08 AM
#15
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden, EU
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 07' 530d - M-Sport - Titanium Silver / Black Dakota leather
08' 120i - M-Sport - Alpine White III / Black Sensatec
Originally Posted by 700700' post='237678' date='Feb 10 2006, 05:53 AM
and gear reatios 
the e39 m5 hits 0-100 in 4.95seconds
the e39 m5 hits 0-100 in 4.95seconds
02-10-2006, 12:29 AM
#16
Senior Members
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-10-2006, 01:44 AM
#17
Members
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 550i Sport - fully loaded minus cold weather package.
Blue angel eyes, 19" 167s
[/quote]
I have to attest that it feels considerably quicker than 5.5 for the 550...I've yet to do tests - but when I get back to the states I will put down some hard nubmers. And to second someone else on this thread...I VOTED 550 WITH MY $$$$$$$
02-10-2006, 02:01 AM
#18
Members
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 E60 525d M Sport, Mystic Blue Adaptive Xenon's (Visibility Package), Grey Dakota Leather, Professional Navigation System, BMW Professional Radio/6 Disc CD Changer, Bluetooth Telephone Prearation, (Media Package)Automatic Air Conditioning-Advanced, Auto Dim Interior and Exterior (Electric Folding) Mirrors, Front Seat Heating
Originally Posted by mr_grinche' post='237598' date='Feb 9 2006, 05:03 PM
[quote name='Don Juan' post='237563' date='Feb 9 2006, 11:44 PM']
what do you guys think?
Car Weight Engine HP TQ
550 3803 4.8L 360@6300 360@3400
M5 4024 4.9L 394@6600 368@3800
the advantages of the 550 is early torque and lighter weight..so it maybe be a very close race up to 100 and maybe who knows what will happen then..ummm
what do you guys think?
Car Weight Engine HP TQ
550 3803 4.8L 360@6300 360@3400
M5 4024 4.9L 394@6600 368@3800
the advantages of the 550 is early torque and lighter weight..so it maybe be a very close race up to 100 and maybe who knows what will happen then..ummm
M5 Any day. Those are paper stats, on the road the M5 would destroy the the 550!!!!
[/quote]
and gear reatios
the e39 m5 hits 0-100 in 4.95seconds[/quote]
I was about to say that's impossible! Then I realised your were talking about KPH, not MPH!
02-10-2006, 05:33 AM
#19
Senior Members
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My Ride: 2006 550i Titanium Silver Metallic, Black Dakota Leather, Anthracite Maple Wood Trim, Cold Weather Package, Premium Sound Package, Sport Package, Steptronic, Navigation, Electric Rear Sunshades, Heated Rear Seats, Sirius Radio
I have driven both and owned an e46 M3 for 3 years. I think the 550i may be deceptively fast as it is so smooth and comfortable compared to the M cars. My biggest concern with the 0-60 for the 550 is traction. When I hammer the pedal with the DSC off I start to smoke rubber. And sans a liimited slip differential I just don't think the start would be as good.
I also have observed that BMW tends to be conservative in 0-60 times except when it comes to M cars. I'm not sure why this is.
I also have observed that BMW tends to be conservative in 0-60 times except when it comes to M cars. I'm not sure why this is.
02-10-2006, 05:37 AM
#20
Contributors
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 545i (SMG)
Titanium Gray
Black Interior, Anthracite Trim
M-tech kit
Sport Package
Premium Sound
Satellite Radio
Active Cruise
Comfort Seats
Navigation
Folding rear seats
I'd rather have my current 545i over an E39 M5..... that's how much I love the E60 design. 