The Competition Discuss the competition to the BMW 5 Series here. Mercedes, Audi, etc...

Any Corvette ZR-1 Fans?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2008, 05:55 PM
  #31  
Senior Members
 
pukka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2008 535i: (8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's 1992 Camaro RS: Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
Default

Some comparisons:

335i: 3.0L TT I6 300hp/300tqm - can be modded to approx 375hp/340tqm
M3: 4.0L V8 414hp/295tqm

It would have been nice to see BMW get more torque out of its V8.
Old 01-04-2008, 05:57 PM
  #32  
Senior Members
 
JetBlack5OC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA & Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EuroCarFan' post='513777' date='Jan 4 2008, 04:28 PM
Seems to me like this whole debate is comparing apples to oranges whether you're talking about motors or the cars. BMW Motorsport's philosophy has always been about high revving engines whether people like it or not; which is not to say it's good or bad. Why debate about which is better??

And why are we comparing a Vette to a BMW?? They're two different cars with different buying segments. Get both! =)
My initial post I kind of said that, but it got out control after that, its personal choice.

And the debate wasn't about the car, it was engine philosophy and how they create horsepower.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:22 PM
  #33  
Contributors
 
EuroCarFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: E60 M5, F85 X5M
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlack5OC' post='513844' date='Jan 4 2008, 06:57 PM
My initial post I kind of said that, but it got out control after that, its personal choice.

And the debate wasn't about the car, it was engine philosophy and how they create horsepower.
Yeah I saw your post and trying to reiterate your sentiment. Doesn't seem like a logical debate. Even if it's just on engine philosophy, both car makers have different ideas so what's the point of discussing it? And none of the posts seem to have anything to do with the thread title!

Let's start over:

Any Corvette ZR-1 Fans?

Hell yeah, I'd buy one!
Old 01-07-2008, 04:40 AM
  #34  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pukka' post='513842' date='Jan 5 2008, 06:55 AM
Some comparisons:

335i: 3.0L TT I6 300hp/300tqm - can be modded to approx 375hp/340tqm
M3: 4.0L V8 414hp/295tqm

It would have been nice to see BMW get more torque out of its V8.
Yes but again i state. In general the higher the revs the lower the torque. Look at Honda S2000 also. It's a screamer compared to a vette, and it has low torque numbers. In fact it's all mathematics: power=torque*rpm*ct. The same power output found is the vetter is close to that found in the M3 but in different way. Vette has more torque but revs lower, in fact power peak is reached well below 7000rpm. The M3 is the opposite. Has low torque but revs high. As i said a million times: both the m5 engines and the m3 engines prove the fact that rpm act as "torque multiplier".

Also about the weight of the two i'd like to know the weight of the vette engine just out of curiousity. We know the M3 engine weight so...

And in conclusion the fact that BMW stays true to it's high rev concept is even more applaudable since they still obtain reliability even at 8500rpm. The only thing i'm trully dissapointed is the fact that bmw didn't put a 10000 rpm dial cluster in the M3 even though it revs to only 8300 rpm but it's soooo damn good to see the 10 rpm digit there. AND YEAH the overall weight of the car compared to the RS4.
Old 01-07-2008, 05:17 AM
  #35  
Senior Members
 
pukka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2008 535i: (8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's 1992 Camaro RS: Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='514687' date='Jan 7 2008, 08:40 AM
Yes but again i state. In general the higher the revs the lower the torque. Look at Honda S2000 also. It's a screamer compared to a vette, and it has low torque numbers. In fact it's all mathematics: power=torque*rpm*ct. The same power output found is the vetter is close to that found in the M3 but in different way. Vette has more torque but revs lower, in fact power peak is reached well below 7000rpm. The M3 is the opposite. Has low torque but revs high. As i said a million times: both the m5 engines and the m3 engines prove the fact that rpm act as "torque multiplier".

Also about the weight of the two i'd like to know the weight of the vette engine just out of curiousity. We know the M3 engine weight so...

And in conclusion the fact that BMW stays true to it's high rev concept is even more applaudable since they still obtain reliability even at 8500rpm. The only thing i'm trully dissapointed is the fact that bmw didn't put a 10000 rpm dial cluster in the M3 even though it revs to only 8300 rpm but it's soooo damn good to see the 10 rpm digit there. AND YEAH the overall weight of the car compared to the RS4.
Dude,
We started over and you're deviating from the topic
Old 01-07-2008, 06:12 AM
  #36  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pukka' post='514695' date='Jan 7 2008, 06:17 PM
Dude,
We started over and you're deviating from the topic
My bad
Old 01-07-2008, 07:31 AM
  #37  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='514687' date='Jan 7 2008, 05:40 AM
Also about the weight of the two i'd like to know the weight of the vette engine just out of curiousity. We know the M3 engine weight so...
Check here for the weight of the M5 and Corvette engines:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overhead_valv...tions_and_types
Old 01-08-2008, 12:58 AM
  #38  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='514724' date='Jan 7 2008, 08:31 PM
Check here for the weight of the M5 and Corvette engines:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overhead_valv...tions_and_types
and the new m3 isn't there. But considering the new M3 has a lighter engine than the 6.3 amg one wouldn't it be true that it's lighter than the vette? Just speculating here...

And imo v8 should not be compared to v10. Aka m5 with the vette. Apples vs oranges.

But nice find swajames. Thanks
Old 01-09-2008, 12:30 PM
  #39  
Senior Members
 
530iii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: BROOKLYN,NY USA
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: E60 "Stripper" Now C6 "Stripper"
Question

For the money personally i'd rather twin turbo or supercharge an 08 Z06 or 08 Base Corvette...


But hey that's what i'd do with my funds!
Old 01-10-2008, 04:15 AM
  #40  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 530iii' post='515632' date='Jan 10 2008, 01:30 AM
For the money personally i'd rather twin turbo or supercharge an 08 Z06 or 08 Base Corvette...


But hey that's what i'd do with my funds!
Might i add with no disrespect that this is typical american thinking...cvadruple tubo chargin the supercharged vette giving it a gazzillion hp and yes some 420 mm tires at the back.

American territory.


Quick Reply: Any Corvette ZR-1 Fans?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 AM.