Originally Posted by GENEaTALS

agreed, but not everyone can be "there" and a lot of people look to forums to find info prior to purchase....so 1/4 mile times and dyno's seem to be the only available tools to objectively measure actual effectiveness of said product. So if methodology is the same for both dyno's, only thing that would cause a change in the results would be the flash correct? Not trying to question the Singh tune, only saying you'd be helping/increasing your sales if you could provide objective measures for it...and since jcool already has the GIAC flash (still under his 30 day trial as well I think), why not use his car to compare it to the Singh flash as the "gas used, meth, dyno, manipulations, and other mods during dyno" would be the same.

It's like testing the effectiveness of a medication. One needs to objectively differentiate placebo versus actual physiologic change right? Once objectives measures are shown to improve the end result via independent variable, sales/use can only increase....

I'm all for being able to recommending/suggest another flash for the N54 engine as long as it proves worth the money and time...

as always, Good luck with sales.....