View Poll Results: Should private citizens have an absolute right to own a firearm?
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll
Opinion on owning guns
#32
Senior Members
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, USA
My Ride: E46 330, E60 550 on order: Carbon Black/Natural Brown, 6MT.
Despite my better judgement, I've gotta chime in.
You worded the question as an absolute right to bear arms. On that basis, your assertion could include no restrictions on ownership for felons, children, the mentally ill, etc.
Furthermore, it would imply no restrictions on the type and form of said arms. Hence, I would be well within my rights to fill my house with RPGs, surface to air missiles, and perhaps a 105mm howitzer for special occasions. (I *need* the proper sound effects when I play Tchaikovsky.)
Thus, while I'm a responsible owner of a few shotguns, I can't answer "yes" to your survey.
You worded the question as an absolute right to bear arms. On that basis, your assertion could include no restrictions on ownership for felons, children, the mentally ill, etc.
Furthermore, it would imply no restrictions on the type and form of said arms. Hence, I would be well within my rights to fill my house with RPGs, surface to air missiles, and perhaps a 105mm howitzer for special occasions. (I *need* the proper sound effects when I play Tchaikovsky.)
Thus, while I'm a responsible owner of a few shotguns, I can't answer "yes" to your survey.
#33
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
From: MPLS, USA
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='598262' date='Jun 8 2008, 05:25 AM
Dranged what's the hand gesture suppose to mean?
Sorry guys.
I'm staying out of this gun discussion. Good luck
#34
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Notts, UK
My Ride: MY2004 530d. Poverty spec
The straightforward wording of the question was fairly deliberate, otherwise it would go like this:
1. Yes. No questions
2. Yes, unless you have a conviction for an armed offence
3. Yes, unless you have a conviction for any violent offence
4. Yes, but only hunting weapons
5. Yes, but you can't carry them around with you
6. Yes, but only after a battery of psychological tests to make sure you are stable
7. Yes, but you need to keep your weapon at a licenced gun club or hunting base
8. Yes, but only if you are a law enforcement officer
etc etc etc.
There are probably as many answers as there are people. I doubt there's even one single most evangelical NRA member who thinks absolutely anyone should be able to walk into a gun shop and walk out with a grenade launcher with no checks whatsoever. There's always going to be some restrictions. So I'm hoping that people will answer based on boiling down their opinion to the basic argument - is it a personal freedom that shouldn't be taken away except for very obvious reasons, or does the negatives of widespread gun ownership outweigh the benefits? And saying that, I'd trying my hardest not to push opinion one way or the other, even though my personal views are probably fairly obvious
1. Yes. No questions
2. Yes, unless you have a conviction for an armed offence
3. Yes, unless you have a conviction for any violent offence
4. Yes, but only hunting weapons
5. Yes, but you can't carry them around with you
6. Yes, but only after a battery of psychological tests to make sure you are stable
7. Yes, but you need to keep your weapon at a licenced gun club or hunting base
8. Yes, but only if you are a law enforcement officer
etc etc etc.
There are probably as many answers as there are people. I doubt there's even one single most evangelical NRA member who thinks absolutely anyone should be able to walk into a gun shop and walk out with a grenade launcher with no checks whatsoever. There's always going to be some restrictions. So I'm hoping that people will answer based on boiling down their opinion to the basic argument - is it a personal freedom that shouldn't be taken away except for very obvious reasons, or does the negatives of widespread gun ownership outweigh the benefits? And saying that, I'd trying my hardest not to push opinion one way or the other, even though my personal views are probably fairly obvious
#35
Members
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire, England
My Ride: Mystic Blue Nov 2004 5.30d SE :: Bluetooth :: Prof Nav :: TV :: Auto :: Beige Leather :: 18'' M Sport Alloys :: Folding Mirrors :: Headlight Washers
I voted no.
Whilst I support the argument of firearm ownership, I dont support it being an absolute right.
My point is that some countries unfortunately have the balance wrong. More training, supervision and tests are mandated when wanting to get behind the wheel of a car then get behind the trigger of a firearm.
Ownership determined by skills-based applications and regular re-assessment is the answer.......not just any old Tom, Dick or Harry merely because it is their "right"
/me gets off my soapbox
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post