Non-sport susp. vs. KW V2 on 20"s comfort comparison
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
My Ride: BMW
Model Year: 2006
Hello,
Anybody here that was on non-sport with 20" wheels and then installed the KW V2. I'm interested in your feedback as far as ride comfort comparisons between the two.
Did moving to the KW V2 made the car feel like you're on 18" or 17"s again or just the same as before (20s on stock non-sport)?
Thanks!
Anybody here that was on non-sport with 20" wheels and then installed the KW V2. I'm interested in your feedback as far as ride comfort comparisons between the two.
Did moving to the KW V2 made the car feel like you're on 18" or 17"s again or just the same as before (20s on stock non-sport)?
Thanks!
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
My Ride: BMW
Model Year: 2006
I agree which is why I'm asking how the non-sport stock on 20"s compare with the KW V2 on. From information I gathered, the spring rate on the KW V2 is the same as the spring rate on non-sport stock (at least for my car) and I want to know if there is a difference in ride quality.
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
My Ride: BMW
Model Year: 2006
What tire sizes are you rolling on now? If you're currently on 35F and 30R sidewalls, then theoritically, the ride should be the same as 20"s with 35F and 30R sidewalls. Of course the tire width would play in a factor as well.
but i'm switching tire brands from hankook to yokohama, first time tying these tires tho
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vman33
Complete Car Sales
5
Mar 14, 2022 04:43 AM
bestofthebest
Complete Car Sales
5
Jan 5, 2016 07:47 PM



