E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods Discussion about both stock and aftermarket parts for the E60. Accessories and modifications too!

E60 550i Dyno w/ AFE, w/ stock, w/ stock + RPi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #351  
miguex's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB - Canada / Buenos Aires - Argentina
My Ride: 2006 BMW M5
Default

Ah! I don't see the ones with AFE results?

I would really like to see ones with AFE even with DINAN. Why all RPI?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #352  
RPIpower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributors
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
My Ride: A Car faster than yours.....
Default

Originally Posted by miguex' post='705541' date='Oct 28 2008, 11:29 AM
Ah! I don't see the ones with AFE results?

I would really like to see ones with AFE even with DINAN. Why all RPI?
M5s have different numbers because of engine variance and because of how the cars are driven. The ECUs learn driving style, etc. The customer that dynoed 383whp does not drive the car hard at all.

None of the cars here have AFE products because they know better and most of these guys were here when we dyno'd the AFE car.

We've already dyno'd the AFE intake systems 3 times. Why do it again? PLEASE READ: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e60-m5-e6...yno-review.html

If you read that, you probably wont have to ask the same question again.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #353  
C's Bimmer's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,646
Likes: 0
From: NY
My Ride: 2008 Silverstone II E60 M5 2012 E70 AW X5 50i Sport w/ LCI Aero Kit and Rocker Panels
Default

Originally Posted by RPIpower' post='705546' date='Oct 28 2008, 02:35 PM
M5s have different numbers because of engine variance and because of how the cars are driven. The ECUs learn driving style, etc. The customer that dynoed 383whp does not drive the car hard at all.
Then I must be getting 650 rwhp. I don't need any more performance mods! Woohoo!!!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #354  
Trinity Autosport's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA
My Ride: F10 M5
Model Year: 2013
Default

Guys,

Whoever purchased the AFE intake from me please go to my thread and list your name for a refund...thank you.

http://forums.e60.net/index.php?showtopic=64310
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #355  
joe@raceprecision's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Easy explanation. Rambird, having gotten his M5 recently, drives it hard and often whereas JC58 rarely ever drives his. When JC58 does drive, he babies his M5. Remember folks, the car learns your driving habits and makes the adjustments accordingly.

Now, with EM_5, he's having an exhaust leak that will soon be prepared. Adjustments were made by an exhaust shop other than RPI.

Originally Posted by C's Bimmer' post='705529' date='Oct 28 2008, 11:22 AM
These are great stats to go off of, but I'm a bit confused by these numbers:

1. How does Rambird(#3), who is "bone stock", have more RWHP than JC58(#4)? 20 more, to be exact?
2. ALTANertive is getting 8 more RWHP than EM_5M5? Both have section 3's, but ALTANertive is running the Arqary exhaust. Is that exhaust offering up 8 additional ponies at the wheel??? Really?
1) ALTANertive M5 (415, Arqary exhaust, RPI ram air intake)
3) Rambird M5 (403, bone stock)
4) JC58 M5 (383, RPI ram air intake)
8) EM_5M5 (407, RPI ram air intake and section 3)
11) Danny0h M5 (425, RPI ram air intake, Powerchip/RPI tune, RPI pulley, Radenergie section 1, 2, 3 exhaust)
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #356  
miguex's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB - Canada / Buenos Aires - Argentina
My Ride: 2006 BMW M5
Default

Interesting! do you mean to drive hard = gain more HP? I didn't know it.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #357  
Gene's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,508
Likes: 3
From: So. Cal (SFV)
My Ride: 2011.5 Alpine White E90 M3 | Black Novillo Leather | Carbon Fiber Leather Trim | ZCP | ZP2 | M-DCT | Navigation | Moonroof | 6FL Mods: TMS 12.5mm spacers all around l Hawk HPS Brake Pads l OEM M3 Edition Grills l Paint Matched Side Gills l Key Hole D
Default

Originally Posted by miguex' post='705561' date='Oct 28 2008, 11:43 AM
Interesting! do you mean to drive hard = gain more HP? I didn't know it.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #358  
EuroCarFan's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
My Ride: E60 M5, F85 X5M
Default

Originally Posted by joet@raceprecision.com' post='705556' date='Oct 28 2008, 11:42 AM
Easy explanation. Rambird, having gotten his M5 recently, drives it hard and often whereas JC58 rarely ever drives his. When JC58 does drive, he babies his M5. Remember folks, the car learns your driving habits and makes the adjustments accordingly.

Now, with EM_5, he's having an exhaust leak that will soon be prepared. Adjustments were made by an exhaust shop other than RPI.
I know that has been a theory with these cars but it'd be really interesting to verify and have JC58 go nuts with his driving style for the next month and re-dyno. Seriously, I'm very interested to see the results and so will others.

BTW, how would you describe driving a car hard? By always being in P500S mode or like me, I'm mostly in P400 mode as I'm usually in traffic but I usually stay in a lower gear and have my rpm between 4K - 5K most of the time.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #359  
miguex's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB - Canada / Buenos Aires - Argentina
My Ride: 2006 BMW M5
Default

Originally Posted by GENEaTALS' post='705564' date='Oct 28 2008, 12:44 PM
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #360  
EM_5's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
My Ride: E60 M5
Default

Yes, I was the one with 407 hp. For the record, my car dyno'd with the exact same setup at RPI a few weeks before and consistently got 412 hp. The only difference is that I (brain-freeze, ignorant, naive...) had the sec 3 welded in because I wanted the tips about another 1/2 inch out and wanted to fix a minor leak... remember, with the leak, I got 412 with just CF delete, Ram Air, BMC's and section 3 from RPI. No other mods (yet). By welding in the exhaust, the shop put an irregular bend on both sides of my exhaust. Once RPI saw this when my car was loaded on the dyno, he already said that it may be a problem. Bingo... that coupled with the 90+ temps caused a drop in 5-6 hp at the wheels for me. I will rectify the exhaust problem and re-dyno. I have confidence that I will get the 412-414 (after leak fixed and pipes corrected) once again.

Rambird's dyno run was also in the morning, where the temps were a good 20-25 F degrees cooler than when my high noon runs were performed. True the dyno compensates, but the heat soak @ high noon may/will cause the ECU to de-tune to protect the vehicle. That, no dyno can compensate for. RPI have seen many many M5's dyno baseline stock at anywhere between 385-395 ish.

NOTE: Remember guys, most of these numbers posted were done in SHOOT-OUT mode on the dyno, and were not raw numbers. Mine was, because I requested for it. Shoot-Out mode basically adds or subtracts HP from a baseline M5 that dyno'd from the same day (the first one, I'm guessing?). This is for purposes of comparing one car to another. So if the original car that everyone is based off of was off, everyone will be off (hard numbers wise) in relation to that car. RPI, correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 PM.