E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

took car in for Aux retrofit - dealer kept it overnight!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 05:48 AM
  #21  
E60Sim's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Default

hmm,, then you lost your CD changer also, right !?!?! :thumbsdown:
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #22  
the-oneil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Members
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: London - UK
Default

Originally Posted by E60Sim' post='373204' date='Jan 3 2007, 09:48 AM
hmm,, then you lost your CD changer also, right !?!?! :thumbsdown:
I did. They left it for me in the boot.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 06:21 AM
  #23  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by subterFUSE' post='372824' date='Jan 1 2007, 10:31 PM
Disadvantages of iPod adapter:
1. Lose CD changer
2. Only works with ipods. AUX input will work with any audio source. What if his iPod breaks, and he doesn't want another iPod?
3. It uses an iPod.

ABC
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #24  
Matt BMW California's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, California
My Ride: 2006 550i Build date 11/2005 options include: cold weather package/ convenience package/premium sound package/ sport package/sunshades/Navigation/ V3 cradle/ OE 166 wheels/M-tech upgrade/M rear spoiler/ racemesh m-tech grill/racemesh kidney grills/M5 mirrors/M5 steering wheel/ HID fog light conversion/ M5 SMG paddles
Default

Originally Posted by Hawkwing' post='372342' date='Dec 30 2006, 07:28 AM
I am a partner in a software company, we set and maintain high standards to service our markets so I'm well aware of the issues that surround authoring, issuing and maintanance of software and the challenges inherent to maintain high quality levels. (By the way IMO I do not consider the CIP program to be that complex in terms of what does, this in relation to what is created and operational in many situations around the world.)
This is an interesting "IMO" from sombody who manages software releases. The very nature of software is managed through version because it will ALWAYS have bugs. The more pressure to deliver innovation, and the more interface options (just how many years and options can be applied to the e60 platform from its conception) introduces a complexity that typical software development does not have to deal with. From where I see BMW sitting, these 'hiccups' while frustrating at our level, do not reflect their commitment to R&D or quality control.

I have version 23.02 and dont get me wrong; I am not pleased with the apparent challenges with the eyebrows and other items; however, the innovation that the car demonstrates FAR outweighs the pain of waiting for the next release. As you seemed to indicate in your feedback, its quite possible that the eyebrow issues could have held back release or prevented several other fixes from being possible at the time. It wasnt documented in the literature; however, perhaps BMW's reluctance to give out CIP upgrades as a first line of defence is because they are aware of the different challenges for each upgrade.

Its definately not ideal. At the end of the day though, "IMO" if one doesnt want these kinds of challenges, one needs to opt for a much more simple car like a baseline Honda....
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #25  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Matt BMW California' post='373234' date='Jan 3 2007, 04:51 PM
The very nature of software is managed through version because it will ALWAYS have bugs. The more pressure to deliver innovation, and the more interface options (just how many years and options can be applied to the e60 platform from its conception) introduces a complexity that typical software development does not have to deal with.
Agreed.

That's why there are three categories of software maintenance:

Corrective
Adaptive
Perfective

(Is there one beginning with "R" missing? )

ABC
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #26  
andy545's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
From: expat in The Netherlands
My Ride: BMW 545iA Black Sapphire
Model Year: 2005
Engine: 545i
Default

The title of this thread has just affected me as well.
I was going in for an update (24.01) for the eyebrow issue, m5 mirror install and aux in retrofit. I changed my mind at the last moment to prefer the native ipod interface after realising the difference at the end for me would be in the region of 80euros..plus they had one in stock.

They just called me informing that their software computer crashed : "please keep you loaner indefenitely - will call you when the 545i is ready"...plus it was mentioned that 24.01 lacks the eyebrow issue fix...

The service dealer mentioned they appreciated my patience and that in 2008 BMW will overhaul their software update procedure/equipment, and that a software update will only take 30 mins in the future. Each mechanics' position will be installed with a network adapter so more cars can be updated at once. Currently only one position is available at my dealer, requiring tedious organisation. They reckon "overnighters" will come to an end.

Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #27  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by andy545' post='373245' date='Jan 3 2007, 06:25 PM
in 2008 BMW will overhaul their software update procedure/equipment, and that a software update will only take 30 mins in the future
Are they simply telling you want you want to hear.

Also "in the future" isn't too specific and not necessarily coincident with the software overhaul.

ABC
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #28  
Hawkwing's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: UK
My Ride: 2006 530D SE; Mystic Blue; Beige Leather; Luxury Pack; Media Pack; Visibility Pack; 123's; Logic 7; + to many more to type........... 2008 730D; Black Sapphire; Cream Beige Leather; plenty of options!
Default

Originally Posted by Matt BMW California' post='373234' date='Jan 3 2007, 04:51 PM
The more pressure to deliver innovation, and the more interface options (just how many years and options can be applied to the e60 platform from its conception) introduces a complexity that typical software development does not have to deal with. From where I see BMW sitting, these 'hiccups' while frustrating at our level, do not reflect their commitment to R&D or quality control.

Its definately not ideal. At the end of the day though, "IMO" if one doesnt want these kinds of challenges, one needs to opt for a much more simple car like a baseline Honda....
I can respect your argument here - I agree the challenge to innovate is paramount in many respects, I do not believe that it should subjucate or pressure the qualitive objective in any way though; I suspect neither would you in your position, the primary issue is as always will remain in balancing the many issues to achieve the result in terms of the overall obective; to which my argument may well pressure given that commercial, market as well as the innovative pressure you mention apply. As to the ongoing development and furthering complexity, yes this is challenge, that said a clearly visioned stuctured design from concept can support expansion, hence this may not be the main cause of ongoing pressures. Always a key challenge is within the advance of the technologies being used and those being intefaced with, this provides the greater challenge to maintaining control over original the objective IMO.

I do tend to take a somewhat lofty position on this issue - primarily the software that I'm involved with on a daily basis is likely a deal more critical in operational requirements - perhaps as you allude to with your last comment I should set my sights lower in respect of the CIP program - we'll for the present I'm unlikely too, I do however support the view that BMW's pursuit of innovation in vehicle contriol systems is to be welcomed - however I will remain critical of these control programs in the future if the flaws persist as now, it is this pressure that provides the drive to continued improvement in delivering quality solutions IMO. That said of course there is always room for compremise .........
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #29  
andy545's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
From: expat in The Netherlands
My Ride: BMW 545iA Black Sapphire
Model Year: 2005
Engine: 545i
Default

Originally Posted by aybeesea' post='373249' date='Jan 3 2007, 07:31 PM
Are they simply telling you want you want to hear.

Also "in the future" isn't too specific and not necessarily coincident with the software overhaul.

ABC
no, I'm actually correlating the 2 items. He specifically mentioned after the supposed overhaul it will take around 30 mins... I've known the guy for 8 years - I don't like to believe he's lying through his teeth for no reason.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #30  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Hawkwing' post='373250' date='Jan 3 2007, 06:32 PM
- we'll for the present I'm unlikely too....compremise .........
I guess your software development QA is very good!

But see how easy it is for bugs to creep in your chosen development language??? What chances for a bug-free CIP?

ABC
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 AM.