E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Should I trade an e60 for e39 M5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 08:17 AM
  #21  
monsterj34's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

i would def go for e39... if i can find low mile e39 i would go for it
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 09:20 AM
  #22  
cmoore_'s Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
My Ride: 545i/6
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Not really. There isn't a gulf in performance, there's only a marginal difference in engine output (360 vs 394), barely any difference in torque and the E39 M5 is actually heavier than the E60 550i...

Well if you take Motor trends numbers id say its a little more than marginal:

Quarter Mile

550i 13.3 @ 106mph (6mt)

e39 m5 13.0 @ 109.5mph

Thats a pretty nice spanking in a straight line and I assume the m5 will pull even harder on the top end (120mph+). I was actually surprised that the e39 m5 does weight 100-200lbs more than the 550i. Handling and breaking may give a slight edge to the M, Im assuming here though.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #23  
swajames's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California, USA
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by cmoore_
Well if you take Motor trends numbers id say its a little more than marginal:

Quarter Mile

550i 13.3 @ 106mph (6mt)

e39 m5 13.0 @ 109.5mph

Thats a pretty nice spanking in a straight line and I assume the m5 will pull even harder on the top end (120mph+). I was actually surprised that the e39 m5 does weight 100-200lbs more than the 550i. Handling and breaking may give a slight edge to the M, Im assuming here though.
That's really not a major difference. When it's that close on a balls-out foot-to-the-floor quarter mile drag, it's going to even closer during regular driving.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 09:43 AM
  #24  
Defy's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
My Ride: 05 545i loaded!
Default

you guys are still missing the point, the E60 is too dang purdy to give up! And the whole 550 vrs M5 doesn't matter as he said he was going to trade a 530 for the M5.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #25  
salu.hk's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Default

If you are looking for the performance and handling, go for 2003 M5. If you are looking for keeping the value down the road for 2-3 years, hold on to your 2006 530i and wait for the E60 M5 when the price come to more reasonable.

But if I'm you, 2003 M5 without turning back.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #26  
pjinca's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
Default

Originally Posted by Defy
you guys are still missing the point, the E60 is too dang purdy to give up! And the whole 550 vrs M5 doesn't matter as he said he was going to trade a 530 for the M5.

If the question is looks, the E39 is arguably the best looking 5er ever, so the E39 M5 wins there. It's a gorgeous car, my only problem would be getting into financing for a 7 yo car - if it's straight cash and no debt, do it, if you have to finance it, walk away
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #27  
cmoore_'s Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
My Ride: 545i/6
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
That's really not a major difference. When it's that close on a balls-out foot-to-the-floor quarter mile drag, it's going to even closer during regular driving.
In a drag race it is, thats approx 2 cars at the lights with the M pulling harder the longer they stay in it. The winner would be obvious.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #28  
cmoore_'s Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
My Ride: 545i/6
Default

Originally Posted by pjinca
If the question is looks, the E39 is arguably the best looking 5er ever, so the E39 M5 wins there. It's a gorgeous car, my only problem would be getting into financing for a 7 yo car - if it's straight cash and no debt, do it, if you have to finance it, walk away
+1
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #29  
Howitzer's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

GET THE M5.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #30  
swajames's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California, USA
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by cmoore_
In a drag race it is, thats approx 2 cars at the lights with the M pulling harder the longer they stay in it. The winner would be obvious.
It's hardly something you get to do every day. My point, and it is absolutely right, is that the gap between the E60 550i and the E39 is not vast, and that the E39 M5 won't "eat the 550 for breakfast" - which was the specific post I responded to. Ultimately the E39 is quicker, but by a far smaller margin than some here would have you believe. The E39 was a fine car for its day, but that day was 8 years ago. That a mainstream E60 such as the 550 is broadly as quick as the pinnacle of the prior generation is something that deserves to not get lost in the misinformation that's flying around.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:55 AM.