RFT vs Conventional
#1
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zoo York
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: Alpine White 2006 530Xi (SLD)
This past Saturday I've went to a meet in the Pocono Mountains and really drove my car.
I did two things before the drive that I have not done previously:
1. I put on non-RFT Contis on my rear wheels
2. I over-inflated the fronts to 34psi
Let me start with the non-RFTs. In a nutshell, I have no idea why I didn't do this sooner - the non-RFT tires in the back did not make my car handle any worse. As a matter of fact, their compound is flexible, compared to the RFTs, which made the rear stick to the asphalt more, actually. Now, my only testing equipment was my brain, so I can't provide any figures as to whether there's an actual difference. But I can tell you that the car does handle better with at least the rear wheels being non-RFT.
Ride quality discussion is really unnessesary, as everyone knows that RFTs are spine-killers, but I should note that the non-RFTs are MUCH-MUCH-WAAAAAAY MUCH better. They are the missing link in the stock e60 configuration IMO - that's how much I like these. And also, mind you these are not really "performance" Contis - I just bougtht a couple of Contis off craigslist especially for this run, but I think they're staying and my RFTs will have to hang out in the garage for the time being.
Which brings me to my next point - over-inflating the RFTs. I overpumped the fronts for better traction on the drive, but it actually rendered a better ride. The reason why it works that way is actually painfully simple: since RFTs have 3x as stiff sidewalls, when the RFTs are under-inflated, they ride a lot stiffer than regular tires. But when you overpump the RFT a littlle, their contact patches - which is the softer part of the tire - rely less on the sidewalls, because the contact patches "buldge out from underneath" the sidewalls more.
*excuse my amateur terminology in some places - do feel free to correct me - whether you feel I'm mistaken conceptually or linguistically
PS I like running the RFTs in front still - I feel that its a great compromise between RFT and non-RFT.
I did two things before the drive that I have not done previously:
1. I put on non-RFT Contis on my rear wheels
2. I over-inflated the fronts to 34psi
Let me start with the non-RFTs. In a nutshell, I have no idea why I didn't do this sooner - the non-RFT tires in the back did not make my car handle any worse. As a matter of fact, their compound is flexible, compared to the RFTs, which made the rear stick to the asphalt more, actually. Now, my only testing equipment was my brain, so I can't provide any figures as to whether there's an actual difference. But I can tell you that the car does handle better with at least the rear wheels being non-RFT.
Ride quality discussion is really unnessesary, as everyone knows that RFTs are spine-killers, but I should note that the non-RFTs are MUCH-MUCH-WAAAAAAY MUCH better. They are the missing link in the stock e60 configuration IMO - that's how much I like these. And also, mind you these are not really "performance" Contis - I just bougtht a couple of Contis off craigslist especially for this run, but I think they're staying and my RFTs will have to hang out in the garage for the time being.
Which brings me to my next point - over-inflating the RFTs. I overpumped the fronts for better traction on the drive, but it actually rendered a better ride. The reason why it works that way is actually painfully simple: since RFTs have 3x as stiff sidewalls, when the RFTs are under-inflated, they ride a lot stiffer than regular tires. But when you overpump the RFT a littlle, their contact patches - which is the softer part of the tire - rely less on the sidewalls, because the contact patches "buldge out from underneath" the sidewalls more.
*excuse my amateur terminology in some places - do feel free to correct me - whether you feel I'm mistaken conceptually or linguistically
PS I like running the RFTs in front still - I feel that its a great compromise between RFT and non-RFT.
#2
Contributors
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South. Deeep South.
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 535i Monaco blue/cream beige, light poplar trim, sport, nav, premium, Logic 7, 6 speed manual
My other rides:
Departed: 2006 530xi Silver gray/black, anthracite maple trim, cold, sport, nav, premium, Logic 7, 6 speed steptronic, bluetooth, adaptive xenons
Departed...2002 525i White/beige, 5 sp manual
That's interesting. I've been considering stiffer swaybars and/or coilovers for my car, and thought perhaps just changing out the back swaybar would reduce the roll without altering how the car handles bumps in the road. You've got just the opposite here, stiffer on the front. Hmmmm... obviously have more reading to do. Do you have issues with body roll with your xi, or have you done some suspension mods like C and Dr.Lev?
#3
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zoo York
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: Alpine White 2006 530Xi (SLD)
Originally Posted by BMRMEUP' post='905215' date='Jun 9 2009, 07:49 AM
That's interesting. I've been considering stiffer swaybars and/or coilovers for my car, and thought perhaps just changing out the back swaybar would reduce the roll without altering how the car handles bumps in the road. You've got just the opposite here, stiffer on the front. Hmmmm... obviously have more reading to do. Do you have issues with body roll with your xi, or have you done some suspension mods like C and Dr.Lev?
That said, I do have to say the car does roll more than an "i" car, naturally. Though I've yet to break traction on this car - RFTs or not, my car just refuses to misbehave. But I'm not entirely convinced that Xi has worse handling, actually - after running the twisties and being able to just about keep up with the 550s, I have to attribute that mostly to the suspension and AWD. I'm not sure how the sway bars affect the handling - I'd imagine, if you don't go on negative camber turns in wet weather, you'll only know of the positive sides. But that added stability in turns means also that you'll break traction on your tires sooner when the weight and acceleration forces overpower the traction. As opposed to a softer suspension, where the car will sway, but the rubber will stick longer.
All depends on what you want. I personally probably would get the sway bars and lower mine - if I weren't selling it.
#4
Contributors
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South. Deeep South.
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 535i Monaco blue/cream beige, light poplar trim, sport, nav, premium, Logic 7, 6 speed manual
My other rides:
Departed: 2006 530xi Silver gray/black, anthracite maple trim, cold, sport, nav, premium, Logic 7, 6 speed steptronic, bluetooth, adaptive xenons
Departed...2002 525i White/beige, 5 sp manual
Originally Posted by v_therussian' post='905221' date='Jun 9 2009, 07:09 AM
My suspension and rims are totally stock. My rear suspension is almost all new though - in February my car was hit while it was parked during a snow storm and about 80% of the rear suspension parts actually were replaced with new.
That said, I do have to say the car does roll more than an "i" car, naturally. Though I've yet to break traction on this car - RFTs or not, my car just refuses to misbehave. But I'm not entirely convinced that Xi has worse handling, actually - after running the twisties and being able to just about keep up with the 550s, I have to attribute that mostly to the suspension and AWD. I'm not sure how the sway bars affect the handling - I'd imagine, if you don't go on negative camber turns in wet weather, you'll only know of the positive sides. But that added stability in turns means also that you'll break traction on your tires sooner when the weight and acceleration forces overpower the traction. As opposed to a softer suspension, where the car will sway, but the rubber will stick longer.
All depends on what you want. I personally probably would get the sway bars and lower mine - if I weren't selling it.
That said, I do have to say the car does roll more than an "i" car, naturally. Though I've yet to break traction on this car - RFTs or not, my car just refuses to misbehave. But I'm not entirely convinced that Xi has worse handling, actually - after running the twisties and being able to just about keep up with the 550s, I have to attribute that mostly to the suspension and AWD. I'm not sure how the sway bars affect the handling - I'd imagine, if you don't go on negative camber turns in wet weather, you'll only know of the positive sides. But that added stability in turns means also that you'll break traction on your tires sooner when the weight and acceleration forces overpower the traction. As opposed to a softer suspension, where the car will sway, but the rubber will stick longer.
All depends on what you want. I personally probably would get the sway bars and lower mine - if I weren't selling it.
Anyway, thanks for the input. Sorry to derail your thread.
Back to the topic of runflats vs. non-runflats..........
#5
Contributors
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: See my signature
Originally Posted by v_therussian' post='905221' date='Jun 9 2009, 08:09 AM
My suspension and rims are totally stock. My rear suspension is almost all new though - in February my car was hit while it was parked during a snow storm and about 80% of the rear suspension parts actually were replaced with new.
That said, I do have to say the car does roll more than an "i" car, naturally. Though I've yet to break traction on this car - RFTs or not, my car just refuses to misbehave. But I'm not entirely convinced that Xi has worse handling, actually - after running the twisties and being able to just about keep up with the 550s, I have to attribute that mostly to the suspension and AWD. I'm not sure how the sway bars affect the handling - I'd imagine, if you don't go on negative camber turns in wet weather, you'll only know of the positive sides. But that added stability in turns means also that you'll break traction on your tires sooner when the weight and acceleration forces overpower the traction. As opposed to a softer suspension, where the car will sway, but the rubber will stick longer.
All depends on what you want. I personally probably would get the sway bars and lower mine - if I weren't selling it.
That said, I do have to say the car does roll more than an "i" car, naturally. Though I've yet to break traction on this car - RFTs or not, my car just refuses to misbehave. But I'm not entirely convinced that Xi has worse handling, actually - after running the twisties and being able to just about keep up with the 550s, I have to attribute that mostly to the suspension and AWD. I'm not sure how the sway bars affect the handling - I'd imagine, if you don't go on negative camber turns in wet weather, you'll only know of the positive sides. But that added stability in turns means also that you'll break traction on your tires sooner when the weight and acceleration forces overpower the traction. As opposed to a softer suspension, where the car will sway, but the rubber will stick longer.
All depends on what you want. I personally probably would get the sway bars and lower mine - if I weren't selling it.
#6
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zoo York
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: Alpine White 2006 530Xi (SLD)
Originally Posted by sdg1871' post='906661' date='Jun 10 2009, 07:59 AM
You probably would not want to lower a car much if you were going back on Snow Hill Road given that we have one front bumper scrape on a non-lowered 550i Sport (not me!).
#7
Contributors
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Louis Burbs, USA
Posts: 8,998
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My Ride: 2007 530i. Purchased 6/28/07. Titanium Silver Metallic, Black Dakota Leather, Dark Poplar Trim, Steptronic, Premium Package, Cold Weather Package, Bluetooth, Adaptive Control Xenons. 10/30/07 Added OEM 124s with 245/40/18 & 275/35/18 Michelin Pilot Sport A/S tires. Installed red Cal Covers� from BavAuto. 11/21/07 Added OEM all-weather floor mats (for winter, carpet in summer) and coat rack. 6/26/08 installed M5-style rear spoiler. 6/30/08 put on red reflectors. 8/22/08 Euro turn signal stickers applied. 3/20/09 Installed Shadowline Trim. 3/27/09 Added Matte Black Kidney Grilles from Trinity. 4/03/09 Installed Bimmian Shadow Matte Black 530i Badges. 4/04/09 Installed LED license plate lights from Trinity. 5/01/09 Installed Brabus Interior LED Kit and White Angel Eyes. 5/02/09 Put in Brabus 6K Fogs. 5/14/09 Removed charcoal filter. 5/15/09 Installed light smoke LED side marker lamps from Trinity. 5/21/09 Sprint Booster. 6/12/09 Painted exhaust tips flat black. 6/13/09 Pulled red Cal Covers and painted calipers low gloss black. 6/27/09 RPI Ram Air Scoop from Trinity. 8/15/09 Installed Brabus's silver invisibulbs front and rear. 9/24/09 Installed R-Dash license plate LEDs from Brabaus (John).
I've never owned RFTs, but I've driven on them numerous times. They suck. I have a spare and an AAA card.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CertifiedOfficial
Private Member Classifieds
5
05-21-2015 12:42 AM