E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Rear wheel drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2009, 01:18 PM
  #1  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
juventus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: White Hall, Arkansas
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: Retired 2008 535i Titanium-silver with sport, premium, steptronic, NAV, HUD Retired 2006 525i
Default

Why don't other car manufacurers make rear wheel drive cars since they are supposed to be more fun (apart from MB, ferrari and a handful of others)? I mean, Honda, Toyota, etc., copy BMW shapes, then why not driving dynamics.

BTW, my wife has an MB c300 and its no fun!!
Old 06-02-2009, 01:22 PM
  #2  
ADD
Senior Members
 
ADD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Finger Lakes NY
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cost.
Old 06-02-2009, 01:24 PM
  #3  
Contributors
 
mrfva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 8,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: .
Model Year: .
Default

Originally Posted by juventus' post='898197' date='Jun 2 2009, 04:18 PM
Why don't other car manufacurers make rear wheel drive cars since they are supposed to be more fun (apart from MB, ferrari and a handful of others)? I mean, Honda, Toyota, etc., copy BMW shapes, then why not driving dynamics.

BTW, my wife has an MB c300 and its no fun!!
... As with RWD, FWD offers two main advantages — just very different ones. The first is economy. It is cheaper to design and build a FWD car. There are fewer parts — and the drivetrain is easier and cheaper to install as the car rolls down the assembly line. FWD also helps cut down the car’s weight by eliminating the separate transmission and axle assemblies used in a RWD car. This, in turn helps the car get better gas mileage. This is why FWD is most commonly found in economy-type and lower-cost cars.

http://www.motorists.org/blog/pros-cons-re...ll-wheel-drive/
Old 06-02-2009, 01:26 PM
  #4  
Contributors
 
Rislar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Lake District, Cumbria UK
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice quote
Old 06-02-2009, 01:35 PM
  #5  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

It goes beyond just cost - one isn't inherently better than the other but there are advantages and disadvantages that tend to dictate where the marketplace makes the split. Engine placement can be transverse in a FWD car so the packaging can be a lot more compact. RWD will typically have a longitudinal placement (especially with a long engine such as an inline 6) which obviously won't fly in the more compact vehicles. FWD also eliminates the driveshaft and enables more interior space. Also, FWD is more predictable and manageable for the average driver. Most of us can deal with understeer, but we can't all correct oversteer or fishtailing... It's not true to say all RWD are better performers or handlers than their FWD brethren, there are good and bad examples of each...
Old 06-02-2009, 01:36 PM
  #6  
Contributors
 
mrfva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 8,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: .
Model Year: .
Default

Originally Posted by Rislar' post='898208' date='Jun 2 2009, 04:26 PM
Nice quote
Source is there as well
Old 06-02-2009, 02:01 PM
  #7  
Contributors
 
spiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Geordie Land
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='898222' date='Jun 2 2009, 10:35 PM
Engine placement can be transverse in a FWD car so the packaging can be a lot more compact. RWD will typically have a longitudinal placement (especially with a long engine such as an inline 6) which obviously won't fly in the more compact vehicles. FWD also eliminates the driveshaft and enables more interior space. Also, FWD is more predictable and manageable for the average driver. Most of us can deal with understeer, but we can't all correct oversteer or fishtailing... It's not true to say all RWD are better performers or handlers than their FWD brethren, there are good and bad examples of each...
Well, rear wheel drive doesn't really make it difficult to intergrate to small vehicles. The z4,honda s2000 and the toyota mr2 is just afew examples.

I never bought what people say about fwd and rwd and both having their cons and pluses.I personally think this is something most automotive companies try to push because they making way more money with FWD. As per previous post the no1 reason is cost .Easy of assembly is another one but that still leads into cost.

I'm driving for around 15 years now with 50/50 experience is both drives. For me, saying that the fwd is safer for the average driver (as most manufacturers quote) is rubbish. If you push a fwd in the rain you're goint to steer straight into a wall, same with snow. If something dodgy happens suddenly most "average" driver's reaction is hitting on the brakes. Again, in fwd this is locking the wheels and straight into a wall. The "average" driver will not push a car either way so it would not fishtail if rwd.

Do you know why some say RWD is more dangerous ? Because the cars they drove were badly set up/designed to start with (take the equivalent fwd honda type r).And let's see how those people would have actually ended up if driving a FWD and doing dodgy things as they would with the RWD. Because let's face it he who really likes driving buys a rwd.

Do you know what is the average drivers reaction to oversteer ? the right one...

One of the best cars i drove and really liked (not on the same level as the beemer but close) was the last gen focus zetec sport. That is a FWD -and i'm still scratching my head on this- that when pushed actually behaves like a mild rwd. No wonder why most people rave on their handling.
Old 06-02-2009, 02:06 PM
  #8  
Contributors
 
craigm1841's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spiros' post='898246' date='Jun 2 2009, 06:01 PM
Well, rear wheel drive doesn't really make it difficult to intergrate to small vehicles. The z4,honda s2000 and the toyota mr2 is just afew examples.

I never bought what people say about fwd and rwd and both having their cons and pluses.I personally think this is something most automotive companies try to push because they making way more money with FWD. As per previous post the no1 reason is cost .Easy of assembly is another one but that still leads into cost.

I'm driving for around 15 years now with 50/50 experience is both drives. For me, saying that the fwd is safer for the average driver (as most manufacturers quote) is rubbish. If you push a fwd in the rain you're goint to steer straight into a wall, same with snow. If something dodgy happens suddenly most "average" driver's reaction is hitting on the brakes. Again, in fwd this is locking the wheels and straight into a wall. The "average" driver will not push a car either way so it would not fishtail if rwd.

Do you know why some say RWD is more dangerous ? Because the cars they drove were badly set up/designed to start with (take the equivalent fwd honda type r).And let's see how those people would have actually ended up if driving a FWD and doing dodgy things as they would with the RWD. Because let's face it he who really likes driving buys a rwd.

Do you know what is the average drivers reaction to oversteer ? the right one...

One of the best cars i drove and really liked (not on the same level as the beemer but close) was the last gen focus zetec sport. That is a FWD -and i'm still scratching my head on this- that when pushed actually behaves like a mild rwd. No wonder why most people rave on their handling.
i disagree. it is much harder for the average driver to lose control with FWD in less then ideal driving conditions.
Old 06-02-2009, 02:20 PM
  #9  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by spiros' post='898246' date='Jun 2 2009, 03:01 PM
Well, rear wheel drive doesn't really make it difficult to intergrate to small vehicles. The z4,honda s2000 and the toyota mr2 is just afew examples.

I never bought what people say about fwd and rwd and both having their cons and pluses.I personally think this is something most automotive companies try to push because they making way more money with FWD. As per previous post the no1 reason is cost .Easy of assembly is another one but that still leads into cost.

I'm driving for around 15 years now with 50/50 experience is both drives. For me, saying that the fwd is safer for the average driver (as most manufacturers quote) is rubbish. If you push a fwd in the rain you're goint to steer straight into a wall, same with snow. If something dodgy happens suddenly most "average" driver's reaction is hitting on the brakes. Again, in fwd this is locking the wheels and straight into a wall. The "average" driver will not push a car either way so it would not fishtail if rwd.

Do you know why some say RWD is more dangerous ? Because the cars they drove were badly set up/designed to start with (take the equivalent fwd honda type r).And let's see how those people would have actually ended up if driving a FWD and doing dodgy things as they would with the RWD. Because let's face it he who really likes driving buys a rwd.

Do you know what is the average drivers reaction to oversteer ? the right one...

One of the best cars i drove and really liked (not on the same level as the beemer but close) was the last gen focus zetec sport. That is a FWD -and i'm still scratching my head on this- that when pushed actually behaves like a mild rwd. No wonder why most people rave on their handling.
Have you ever taken the time to look at the length of the hood on a Z4, S2000 or MR2 relative to the size of the car? And have you ever tried to get four people plus luggage in a Z4 or an S2000?

As for your other comments. I disagree with you, and the industry disagrees with you. Show me a snowy day or a rainy day and for most drivers, most of the time, they will probably do better in an FWD car than an RWD car. With or without snow tires.

More to the point, manufacturers typically and deliberately set up their performance RWD cars to initially understeer when pushed. BMW does it, Porsche does it. Because for most drivers, most of the time, it's safer and relatively easy to correct. With the FWD cars that particular feature comes as standard...
Old 06-02-2009, 02:28 PM
  #10  
Contributors
 
CWS530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Louis Burbs, USA
Posts: 8,998
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 2007 530i. Purchased 6/28/07. Titanium Silver Metallic, Black Dakota Leather, Dark Poplar Trim, Steptronic, Premium Package, Cold Weather Package, Bluetooth, Adaptive Control Xenons. 10/30/07 Added OEM 124s with 245/40/18 & 275/35/18 Michelin Pilot Sport A/S tires. Installed red Cal Covers� from BavAuto. 11/21/07 Added OEM all-weather floor mats (for winter, carpet in summer) and coat rack. 6/26/08 installed M5-style rear spoiler. 6/30/08 put on red reflectors. 8/22/08 Euro turn signal stickers applied. 3/20/09 Installed Shadowline Trim. 3/27/09 Added Matte Black Kidney Grilles from Trinity. 4/03/09 Installed Bimmian Shadow Matte Black 530i Badges. 4/04/09 Installed LED license plate lights from Trinity. 5/01/09 Installed Brabus Interior LED Kit and White Angel Eyes. 5/02/09 Put in Brabus 6K Fogs. 5/14/09 Removed charcoal filter. 5/15/09 Installed light smoke LED side marker lamps from Trinity. 5/21/09 Sprint Booster. 6/12/09 Painted exhaust tips flat black. 6/13/09 Pulled red Cal Covers and painted calipers low gloss black. 6/27/09 RPI Ram Air Scoop from Trinity. 8/15/09 Installed Brabus's silver invisibulbs front and rear. 9/24/09 Installed R-Dash license plate LEDs from Brabaus (John).
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='898275' date='Jun 2 2009, 05:20 PM
Show me a snowy day or a rainy day and for most drivers, most of the time, they will probably do better in an FWD car than an RWD car.
No doubt about it. I've had FWD cars that I TRIED to get loose in snow and couldn't do it (well, at least not without great effort). I feel much better knowing my wife drives a FWD.


Quick Reply: Rear wheel drive



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM.