The Official G-Meter Testing Thread
#11
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 700700' post='236507' date='Feb 7 2006, 08:36 PM
well it seems far to low IMO. Znod is that with maximum weight off the car..
I.E. spare wheels and accesories off , and you in a tight fitting aerodynamic rubber suit ?
I.E. spare wheels and accesories off , and you in a tight fitting aerodynamic rubber suit ?
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
grogan and I have never been surprised that we can beat the magazines. But, of course, using a meter, not correcting for weather and altitude, etc., introduces uncontrolled variables. Still, grogan's meter has been dragstrip calabrated--which is a big plus.
His car and my car used to be equal, but he is faster now. His car is completely stock although, when you factor in the differences in our cars, they may weigh about the same. He doesn't have an after-market muffler or throttle body--which by defintion may add no SOP performance (but the difference may be measurable on average). I may even go back to my stock muffler to see what happens, but I do like the sound
(98% of it) and looks of my B&B.
#12
Contributors
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FLA - East Coast, USA
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your package is in the UPS system and is on time with a scheduled delivery date of 02/10/2006.
Well looks like Friday after work for the Gtech RR to arrive. Get some relief on Saturday on about 50% of my honey do's and get installed. While she is at church I can sneak off and make first runs, I hope
Well looks like Friday after work for the Gtech RR to arrive. Get some relief on Saturday on about 50% of my honey do's and get installed. While she is at church I can sneak off and make first runs, I hope
#13
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by cobradav' post='236538' date='Feb 7 2006, 10:00 PM
Your package is in the UPS system and is on time with a scheduled delivery date of 02/10/2006.
Well looks like Friday after work for the Gtech RR to arrive. Get some relief on Saturday on about 50% of my honey do's and get installed. While she is at church I can sneak off and make first runs, I hope
Well looks like Friday after work for the Gtech RR to arrive. Get some relief on Saturday on about 50% of my honey do's and get installed. While she is at church I can sneak off and make first runs, I hope
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
Thanks for talking up the Pro RR. You helped me get interested in testing again even though my car has lost time. I know that you did a write up on another thread on what can be done with the Pro RR. How about summarizing its high points on this thread? I'll do the same for the GT2 below.
GT2:
I purchased my GT2 here--paying $179.99--and not shopping for price. For another $30 or so, you can get a guick-turn around repair warranty and the right to lifetime software updates--which I got. For about $25 more, you can get software and a computer download cable. There is no mention of an AC adapter so it appears that your have to download from car to laptop.
I don't really investigate anything on my meters except for their abilties to time to distance and speed, but the GT2 will also do braking and cornering tests. The GT2 will give zero to whatevers for all ten-mile increments covered by a run up to a distance of 1/4 mile. It gives speed to distance values for 30,' 60,', 300,', 1k,' 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile. It also gives peak HP between 7 (as I recall) and 60 MPH and average HP over this interval.
The GT2 is very easy to setup and use. Do your setup, attach the meter to your windshield, find a safe, flat, and level strip, stop your car, push a button, wait for the meter to say "go," and, then, go for it. After an eigth mile run, for example, the meter clearly displays one's 0 to sixty time. Scrolling through the additional data is easy by using up and down arrow keys. All data are displayed very clearly. The meter stores the data for many runs so you don't have to write your data down immediately.
Also, UUronL posted this article link earlier. The article provides much info on meters used in testing (including both the GT2 and the Pro RR) and related matters. Check it out; its a great article.
#14
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[quote name='Znod' date='Feb 7 2006, 06:23 PM' post='236429']
Hi Friends:
I am starting "The Official G-Meter Testing Thread" here because the performance and testing of 5-Series autos is a matter of general interest. The predecessor thread linked here really doesn't belong in the "Parts, Accessories, and Mods" discussion. I am making a fresh start with my car here although I have attached one item related to my testing prior to and after my update to 20.01.00. My dealer is trying to deal with my performance loss (PUMA case begun), but this is where I am, and here we go.
To date, besides me, grogan545, EuroCarFan, and Bokke are involved in testing--using Passport GT2's--which provide good, easy-to-access-data without using software and downloading to a computer (which can be done if one spends a bit more). Previously, Realtyman was involved in testing using the same type meter (best 0 to 60 of 5.35 with his SMG). And, once the winter weather let's up, I think he is going to began again. Finally, cobradav's meter, a Tesla Pro RR, is on the way. I exchanged my more than two-month's old Tesla Pro SS for the Pro RR (also on its way)--through the generosity of Tesla. For more comparability with others now; easier to view data of most immediate interest; and a less expensive meter, the GT2 may be the better choice for the average tester. But, for one wanting to delve more deeply into test data, after computer download, the Pro RR may be the better choice. Or, if you are like me, then the better choice is both.![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
Guys, please bring anything you want over from any prior threads. For example, grogan, you may want to bring over your summary data and the results of your recent post-20.01.00 test data. And, Bokke, you might want to bring over all your test data since you have just begun. EuroCarFan, when is it going to stop raining on you? Here are some of the data from the big-three US auto magazines for the 545i.
BMW 545i--Manual CD 5/04 5.5 14.1 103
BMW 545i--Step RT 6/05 5.2 13.7 104.0
BMW 545i--Step MT 8/04 5.4 13.7 102.1
BMW 545i--Step MT 11/05 5.5 13.8 102.8
BMW claims 0 to 60 of 5.8 for the Step and 5.7 for the SMG and manual, respectively
Today, I did my last tests before going to my dealer for what I think was a reset of my "DME Engine management ME9." I will begin my post-dealer testing probably starting tomorrow. Here are my two best (of four) runs from today. grogan545 introduced the idea that using D might be good after 20+ updates. One of my best today was in D.
Run in D--GT2 Used--No Brake Torquing--DSC/DTC Off--55 Degrees
HP 327 @ 55; Ave HP 275
0 - 80 8.80
0 - 70 7.05
0 - 60 5.30
0 - 50 3.97
0 - 40 2.87
0 - 30 1.70
0 - 20 .92
0 - 10 .28
1/8 Mile Time 8.90
1/8 Mile Speed 79
330' 5.75
60' 1.95
Run in DS--GT2 Used--No Brake Torquing--DSC/DTC Off--55 Degrees
HP 328 @ 55; Ave HP 276
0 - 80 8.80
0 - 70 7.05
0 - 60 5.32
0 - 50 4.03
0 - 40 2.90
0 - 30 1.73
0 - 20 .98
0 - 10 .28
1/8 Mile Time 8.93
1/8 Mile Speed 79
330' 5.80
60' 1.98
Below are my before and after 20.01.00 data. I am not going to dwell here on what is causing the differences. This matter is dealt with elsewhere. My goal, with respect to this thread, is to test, document, and improve my results given where I am starting and to share all pertinent information garnered with all interested.
Enjoy.
Great thread started Znod.I think there is a much larger exposure in this forum.
Below are some of my times
speed R1 R2 R3 R4 Ave
0-10 .33 .35 .33 .33 .34
0-20 1.05 1.02 1.05 1.00 1.03
0-30 1.80 1.73 1.85 1.73 1.78
0-40 2.93 2.80 2.83 2.80 2.84
0-50 4.02 3.83 3.83 3.88 3.89
0-60 5.33 5.03 5.00 5.17 5.13
0-70 6.93 6.55 6.52 6.78 6.70
0-80 8.65 8.12 8.05 8.45 8.32
60' 2.05 2.02 2.05 2.00 2.03
330' 5.83 5.72 5.75 5.75 5.76
1/8 8.93 8.75 8.75 8.83 8.79
1/8 spd 80.0 82.1 82.6 80.6 81.3
Runs 1 & 4 are in one direction,runs 2 & 3 are in the opposite direction.There is obviously a slight grade in my test road so I test both directions to equal it out.All above runs were in warm weather(May,August 2005)
using manual mode in the step with DTC/DSC disabled
I made 2 runs recently using D and leting the step shift for itself.Due to tremendous traction problems I left DTC/DSC enabled.Standard Goodyear tires are terrible in cold weather(30 F).Updated to 20.01 before these runs.
speed R1 R2
0-10 .30 .30
0-20 1.10 .97
0-30 1.88 1.70
0-40 3.00 2.85
0-50 3.97 3.90
0-60 5.10 5.25
0-70 6.60 6.88
0-80 8.08 8.50
0.90 9.68 10.40
0-100 11.65
60' 2.08 2.00
1/8 spd 83.1 80.4
330' 5.83 5.75
1/8 8.83 8.85
1/4 13.48
1/4 spd 102
Again run 1 & run 2 in opposite directions.Note I had a better start in "uphill" direction but by 60mph Run 1(downhill)is faster.The grade is not apparant to the eye
Hi Friends:
I am starting "The Official G-Meter Testing Thread" here because the performance and testing of 5-Series autos is a matter of general interest. The predecessor thread linked here really doesn't belong in the "Parts, Accessories, and Mods" discussion. I am making a fresh start with my car here although I have attached one item related to my testing prior to and after my update to 20.01.00. My dealer is trying to deal with my performance loss (PUMA case begun), but this is where I am, and here we go.
To date, besides me, grogan545, EuroCarFan, and Bokke are involved in testing--using Passport GT2's--which provide good, easy-to-access-data without using software and downloading to a computer (which can be done if one spends a bit more). Previously, Realtyman was involved in testing using the same type meter (best 0 to 60 of 5.35 with his SMG). And, once the winter weather let's up, I think he is going to began again. Finally, cobradav's meter, a Tesla Pro RR, is on the way. I exchanged my more than two-month's old Tesla Pro SS for the Pro RR (also on its way)--through the generosity of Tesla. For more comparability with others now; easier to view data of most immediate interest; and a less expensive meter, the GT2 may be the better choice for the average tester. But, for one wanting to delve more deeply into test data, after computer download, the Pro RR may be the better choice. Or, if you are like me, then the better choice is both.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
Guys, please bring anything you want over from any prior threads. For example, grogan, you may want to bring over your summary data and the results of your recent post-20.01.00 test data. And, Bokke, you might want to bring over all your test data since you have just begun. EuroCarFan, when is it going to stop raining on you? Here are some of the data from the big-three US auto magazines for the 545i.
BMW 545i--Manual CD 5/04 5.5 14.1 103
BMW 545i--Step RT 6/05 5.2 13.7 104.0
BMW 545i--Step MT 8/04 5.4 13.7 102.1
BMW 545i--Step MT 11/05 5.5 13.8 102.8
BMW claims 0 to 60 of 5.8 for the Step and 5.7 for the SMG and manual, respectively
Today, I did my last tests before going to my dealer for what I think was a reset of my "DME Engine management ME9." I will begin my post-dealer testing probably starting tomorrow. Here are my two best (of four) runs from today. grogan545 introduced the idea that using D might be good after 20+ updates. One of my best today was in D.
Run in D--GT2 Used--No Brake Torquing--DSC/DTC Off--55 Degrees
HP 327 @ 55; Ave HP 275
0 - 80 8.80
0 - 70 7.05
0 - 60 5.30
0 - 50 3.97
0 - 40 2.87
0 - 30 1.70
0 - 20 .92
0 - 10 .28
1/8 Mile Time 8.90
1/8 Mile Speed 79
330' 5.75
60' 1.95
Run in DS--GT2 Used--No Brake Torquing--DSC/DTC Off--55 Degrees
HP 328 @ 55; Ave HP 276
0 - 80 8.80
0 - 70 7.05
0 - 60 5.32
0 - 50 4.03
0 - 40 2.90
0 - 30 1.73
0 - 20 .98
0 - 10 .28
1/8 Mile Time 8.93
1/8 Mile Speed 79
330' 5.80
60' 1.98
Below are my before and after 20.01.00 data. I am not going to dwell here on what is causing the differences. This matter is dealt with elsewhere. My goal, with respect to this thread, is to test, document, and improve my results given where I am starting and to share all pertinent information garnered with all interested.
Enjoy.
Great thread started Znod.I think there is a much larger exposure in this forum.
Below are some of my times
speed R1 R2 R3 R4 Ave
0-10 .33 .35 .33 .33 .34
0-20 1.05 1.02 1.05 1.00 1.03
0-30 1.80 1.73 1.85 1.73 1.78
0-40 2.93 2.80 2.83 2.80 2.84
0-50 4.02 3.83 3.83 3.88 3.89
0-60 5.33 5.03 5.00 5.17 5.13
0-70 6.93 6.55 6.52 6.78 6.70
0-80 8.65 8.12 8.05 8.45 8.32
60' 2.05 2.02 2.05 2.00 2.03
330' 5.83 5.72 5.75 5.75 5.76
1/8 8.93 8.75 8.75 8.83 8.79
1/8 spd 80.0 82.1 82.6 80.6 81.3
Runs 1 & 4 are in one direction,runs 2 & 3 are in the opposite direction.There is obviously a slight grade in my test road so I test both directions to equal it out.All above runs were in warm weather(May,August 2005)
using manual mode in the step with DTC/DSC disabled
I made 2 runs recently using D and leting the step shift for itself.Due to tremendous traction problems I left DTC/DSC enabled.Standard Goodyear tires are terrible in cold weather(30 F).Updated to 20.01 before these runs.
speed R1 R2
0-10 .30 .30
0-20 1.10 .97
0-30 1.88 1.70
0-40 3.00 2.85
0-50 3.97 3.90
0-60 5.10 5.25
0-70 6.60 6.88
0-80 8.08 8.50
0.90 9.68 10.40
0-100 11.65
60' 2.08 2.00
1/8 spd 83.1 80.4
330' 5.83 5.75
1/8 8.83 8.85
1/4 13.48
1/4 spd 102
Again run 1 & run 2 in opposite directions.Note I had a better start in "uphill" direction but by 60mph Run 1(downhill)is faster.The grade is not apparant to the eye
#15
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great grogan. Thanks for posting your data. We are off and running. I am looking forward to seeing what we can do with 20.01.00.
#16
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[QUOTE=Znod;236462]
Great idea ECF:
I have corrected the test you mentioned and two others resulting from copy, paste, and distractions. Here are the settings that all of us using the GT2 are using, except that grogan545 is using a 10" rollout to maintain comparability with his earlier testing.
My setup values for the time/speed related GT2 settings are as follows.
1. Rollout distance for both 0 to 60 and the ? mile?12??which is a "shallow-staging" standard that often is attemped on dragstrips and often is used in magazine tests.
2. Pitch correction?1.9?I used this correction factor because the GT2 manual indicates that, in trying to develop pitch correction factors for the C5 Z06 and the Audi S4, values of 1.5 and 2.0 had worked well. Note that my manual indicates that an increase/decrease in the pitch correction factor of .2 will result in ?a .03 slower/faster ? mile time. So, I am trying to be conservative in setting the pitch correction.
My setup values for the flywheel-horse power (FHP)-related GT2 settings are as follows.
1. Test weight of car?4,150 lbs. In this regard, Car and Driver test used a test weight of 4,150 lbs for a car equipped similarly to mine--but with some + and - adjustments needed. Since I don't have all the values needed for the adjustments, I decided just to use the Car and Driver value.
2. Drive-train loss?.20?because of my Steptronic?the value recommended by my manual for an automatic transmission
3. Rolling resistance--.13?the GT2 default?left it alone since I had no idea what better to assume
4. Aerodynamic drag?6.5?I assumed a value .3 lower than the one that worked well for Passport on the Audi S4.
[/quote
I am going to set my GT2 to 12' rollout,4150#,pitch to 1.9,and CD to 6.5 for all future runs so we have a direct comparison.
Originally Posted by EuroCarFan' post='236454' date='Feb 7 2006, 06:52 PM
As for me, this whole week is nice and sunny but I'm swamped with work. Preparing for a business trip this Sat to Brazil and Mexico. Will be back on Feb 18th. Hope I can get some runs then.
Have fun, and we are looking forward to you data very much.
Have fun, and we are looking forward to you data very much.
I have corrected the test you mentioned and two others resulting from copy, paste, and distractions. Here are the settings that all of us using the GT2 are using, except that grogan545 is using a 10" rollout to maintain comparability with his earlier testing.
My setup values for the time/speed related GT2 settings are as follows.
1. Rollout distance for both 0 to 60 and the ? mile?12??which is a "shallow-staging" standard that often is attemped on dragstrips and often is used in magazine tests.
2. Pitch correction?1.9?I used this correction factor because the GT2 manual indicates that, in trying to develop pitch correction factors for the C5 Z06 and the Audi S4, values of 1.5 and 2.0 had worked well. Note that my manual indicates that an increase/decrease in the pitch correction factor of .2 will result in ?a .03 slower/faster ? mile time. So, I am trying to be conservative in setting the pitch correction.
My setup values for the flywheel-horse power (FHP)-related GT2 settings are as follows.
1. Test weight of car?4,150 lbs. In this regard, Car and Driver test used a test weight of 4,150 lbs for a car equipped similarly to mine--but with some + and - adjustments needed. Since I don't have all the values needed for the adjustments, I decided just to use the Car and Driver value.
2. Drive-train loss?.20?because of my Steptronic?the value recommended by my manual for an automatic transmission
3. Rolling resistance--.13?the GT2 default?left it alone since I had no idea what better to assume
4. Aerodynamic drag?6.5?I assumed a value .3 lower than the one that worked well for Passport on the Audi S4.
[/quote
I am going to set my GT2 to 12' rollout,4150#,pitch to 1.9,and CD to 6.5 for all future runs so we have a direct comparison.
#17
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by grogan545' post='236557' date='Feb 7 2006, 10:54 PM
I am going to set my GT2 to 12' rollout,4150#,pitch to 1.9,and CD to 6.5 for all future runs so we have a direct comparison.
#18
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[/quote]
I forgot about your sport package I will keep mine at present setting of 2.0.I think all other settings are the same for us.
#20
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by EuroCarFan' post='236504' date='Feb 7 2006, 07:33 PM
Hey Znod, how about doing some before and after runs with regards to the Charcoal Filter? ![Tongue](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/tongue.gif)
The weather for this weekend looks some what favorable....