E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Compare 166's vs. 172's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2008 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
Suchet's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Mumbai
Default

I guess you guys know where I stand... 166

Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.

I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
Old 06-20-2008 | 04:22 AM
  #12  
Moopai's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
My Ride: 2004 545i TITANIUM GREY II on Black Dakota Lthr, Comfort Seats, Sports PKG, Premium PKG, Active/Dynamic Drive, NAV, Winter Package.
Default

Guys don't forget the M166 are on a non sports package. The sports suspension does lower the car a bit in the front.


Originally Posted by Suchet' post='606485' date='Jun 20 2008, 03:00 AM
I guess you guys know where I stand... 166

Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.

I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
Old 06-20-2008 | 05:15 AM
  #13  
GT Premi's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
My Ride: 2008 BMW 550i Sport Carbon Black Metallic/Cream Beige Manny tranny and other stuff Recently gone, but never forgotten: 2005 Ford Mustang GT (hence the name) Torch Red/Crimson Manny tranny and every option available for that year 2002 Chrysler 300M Special Brilliant Black/Light Taupe/Dark Slate Autostick and goo-gobs of neat features that I will sorely miss
Default

Originally Posted by Moopai' post='606553' date='Jun 20 2008, 08:22 AM
Guys don't forget the M166 are on a non sports package. ...
As are the 172s. The OP clearly said both cars are without the Sport package.

172s FTW!! 166s look better on an M5.
Old 06-20-2008 | 05:56 AM
  #14  
Kelly550's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

The 166's are nice, but the 172's just look better.... (But I'm kind of biased, as I have 172's?!?!)

-- Kelly
Old 07-19-2008 | 07:49 AM
  #15  
Ricracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
From: Helsinki, Finland
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Default

More comments, please.

I think they both look

By lowering the cars, they would look even better.

(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
Old 07-20-2008 | 06:24 AM
  #16  
MRV99's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

I went with 172's on my Titanium Silver 545 sport w/ PS2's. Love them.
Old 07-20-2008 | 06:37 AM
  #17  
silver2000stang's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Default

i prefer the 166s, again biased as I have them, I like how they almost immediately start sweeping into the hub as opposed to looking flat then dropping into the hub. It is really dramatic when you are walking to your car in a parking lot or driveway and look at those wheels. I have the sport suspension, but non-sport vs. non-sport still 166s.
Old 07-20-2008 | 06:41 AM
  #18  
Moopai's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
My Ride: 2004 545i TITANIUM GREY II on Black Dakota Lthr, Comfort Seats, Sports PKG, Premium PKG, Active/Dynamic Drive, NAV, Winter Package.
Default

I like the 166s but I agree the car is pretty high, if this was the sports package they would've look better.

Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='627919' date='Jul 19 2008, 11:49 AM
More comments, please.

I think they both look

By lowering the cars, they would look even better.

(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
Old 07-20-2008 | 06:43 AM
  #19  
E60BEEMER's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: LONDON UK
Question

THEY BOTH LOOK STUNNING.......I had them both, well ive got the 166s now, but before it was the others..........

let you decide. both are good!
Old 07-20-2008 | 06:48 AM
  #20  
2k6e60's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
My Ride: 2006 530i.... Saphire Black Metallic...19 inch Axis Milanos....Auburn dakota interior.....ACS rear lip spoiler... And a whole lot of head turns ;)
Default

I like the 166's the concave look to them are fabulous!

But I must admit, you need the M Tech Kit for them to really stand out!


Quick Reply: Compare 166's vs. 172's



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 AM.