E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Compare 166's vs. 172's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2008, 09:37 AM
  #1  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
Ricracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Default

I borrowed Suchet's pic and did trow in a pic of my car.
Both cars are without sport suspension.

Best comparison between 166 and 172 wheels ever.
One pic from Finland and the other from India...
.
Attached Thumbnails Compare 166's vs. 172's-bmw_166_lci.jpg   Compare 166's vs. 172's-ygu_15.jpg  
Old 06-19-2008, 04:36 PM
  #2  
Contributors
 
UUronL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 530i Sport Silver Gray - Black Leather - Anthracite Maple Manual Transmission Premium Audio Cold Weather Package Rear sunshade Sirius Radio Autobahnd Roadblock (3M) film kit
Default

That pic of the 166s doesn't look good, the car appears "jacked up" or something.
Old 06-19-2008, 04:40 PM
  #3  
Super Moderator
 
Gene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So. Cal (SFV)
Posts: 17,508
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
My Ride: 2011.5 Alpine White E90 M3 | Black Novillo Leather | Carbon Fiber Leather Trim | ZCP | ZP2 | M-DCT | Navigation | Moonroof | 6FL Mods: TMS 12.5mm spacers all around l Hawk HPS Brake Pads l OEM M3 Edition Grills l Paint Matched Side Gills l Key Hole D
Default

There is a slight downward angle with the 172's as opposed to the level side view/slight up view of the 166's...you 2 should just take a tape measure to your cars and compare the gap from tip of wheel to mid wheel well. Top of tire tread to wheel well may differ secondary to tires...
Old 06-19-2008, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Contributors
 
UUronL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 530i Sport Silver Gray - Black Leather - Anthracite Maple Manual Transmission Premium Audio Cold Weather Package Rear sunshade Sirius Radio Autobahnd Roadblock (3M) film kit
Default

Originally Posted by geneatals' post='606165' date='Jun 19 2008, 08:40 PM
There a slight downward angle with the 172's as opposed to the level side view/slight up view of the 166's...you 2 should just take a tape measure to your cars and compare the gap from tip of wheel to mid wheel well. Top of tire tread to wheel well may differ secondary to tires...

I did notice that... however, my eye is drawn more to the gap just behind the rear wheel. I'm just saying my eye tells me it's not quite right.
Old 06-19-2008, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Super Moderator
 
Gene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So. Cal (SFV)
Posts: 17,508
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
My Ride: 2011.5 Alpine White E90 M3 | Black Novillo Leather | Carbon Fiber Leather Trim | ZCP | ZP2 | M-DCT | Navigation | Moonroof | 6FL Mods: TMS 12.5mm spacers all around l Hawk HPS Brake Pads l OEM M3 Edition Grills l Paint Matched Side Gills l Key Hole D
Default

Originally Posted by UUronL' post='606168' date='Jun 19 2008, 05:46 PM
I did notice that... however, my eye is drawn more to the gap just behind the rear wheel. I'm just saying my eye tells me it's not quite right.
"eye" see your point
Old 06-19-2008, 05:55 PM
  #6  
Members
 
benny1661's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 525i 06 - M-sports package, bluetooth, ff and rr camera, PDC, black interior, active steering, DVD system
Default

i have seen a few with the 166's and one with 172's... i like the 166's better
Old 06-19-2008, 06:08 PM
  #7  
Contributors
 
ITNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: L.A. Burbs
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 08 535i, Platinum Gray, Sport Pkg
Default

Originally Posted by benny1661' post='606218' date='Jun 19 2008, 06:55 PM
i have seen a few with the 166's and one with 172's... i like the 166's better

.
Old 06-19-2008, 06:35 PM
  #8  
Contributors
 
wlkonacloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550i Alpine white
Default

Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='605099' date='Jun 18 2008, 01:37 PM
I borrowed Suchet's pic and did trow in a pic of my car.
Both cars are without sport suspension.

Best comparison between 166 and 172 wheels ever.
One pic from Finland and the other from India...
.
172's look better..the 166's look funny in that pic
Old 06-19-2008, 10:40 PM
  #9  
Senior Members
 
MatyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 05 530i M Sport Sedan / Silver Grey
Default

I think the ride height looks exactly the same on both pics the only differance is the tyres on the car with the 166's are more in foucs, that may be what is making the fender gap look more pronouned.

Any how M172 are still the reigning KING of OEM in my book maybe one of the new styles coming with the F-10 will dethrone them.
Old 06-19-2008, 10:58 PM
  #10  
Senior Members
 
AlexFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy, Milano
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 545i SMG with Limited Slip Differential
Model Year: 2005
Default

166 require Mtech/M5 look


Quick Reply: Compare 166's vs. 172's



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.