E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Auto v Manual 0-60mph (100km/h)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2005, 01:20 PM
  #1  
Contributors
Thread Starter
 
Merv the Derv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stourbridge, UK
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535D Sport Auto
Default

Anyone notice on the old E39 model the 0-60 figures were quite a bit different in terms of the auto being about a second slower than the manual. Now on the E60, which I thought used the same gearboxes, the difference is only 0.2 sec. Has BMW increased the efficiency of their gearboxes or is just wishful thinking?
Old 09-12-2005, 01:45 PM
  #2  
ipp
Senior Members
 
ipp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden, EU
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 07' 530d - M-Sport - Titanium Silver / Black Dakota leather 08' 120i - M-Sport - Alpine White III / Black Sensatec
Default

Originally Posted by Merv the Derv' date='Sep 12 2005, 10:20 PM
Anyone notice on the old E39 model the 0-60 figures were quite a bit different in terms of the auto being about a second slower than the manual. Now on the E60, which I thought used the same gearboxes, the difference is only 0.2 sec. Has BMW increased the efficiency of their gearboxes or is just wishful thinking?
[snapback]169783[/snapback]
Maybe one reason is the sixth gear?
Old 09-12-2005, 01:47 PM
  #3  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by Merv the Derv' date='Sep 12 2005, 04:20 PM
Anyone notice on the old E39 model the 0-60 figures were quite a bit different in terms of the auto being about a second slower than the manual. Now on the E60, which I thought used the same gearboxes, the difference is only 0.2 sec. Has BMW increased the efficiency of their gearboxes or is just wishful thinking?
[snapback]169783[/snapback]
On the 545i, the differences between manual and auto definitely are small--maybe attributable to changed rear-end ratio(s) (don't know though). One 545i auto posted 5.2 to 60 is an R&T or C&D test, and I have never seen a manual beat that in an "official' test--which is interesting in its own right.
Old 09-12-2005, 02:54 PM
  #4  
Contributors
 
gwf545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2015 535D M Sport
Default

The way I understand it is that there are two features at work in the ZF 6 speed Steptronic that make it more competetive with SMG or manual transmissions. First, the torque convertor is much more efficient and less lossy. Second, the torque convertor can be locked up in all six gears, which means that you can potentially remove all its loss once the lock-up occurs. Most auto transmissions do this today, but only their top gear. It's primarily for fuel economy.

Under what conditions the Step locks up in lower gears is unclear, but the PDF elsewhere on this site says it does. I have also experienced it lock up in 2nd and higher gears. It's much more diffcult to detect this in 1st, since it is such a low ratio. You can tell it locks up because a slight depression of the throttle will not run the RPMs up without accelerating the car as you might see in a conventional automatic. The engine in this case is clearly "connected" to the rear wheels and it feels like it. However, it also unlocks if you goose it hard enough and afterward I can't detect when it locks up again.

I am not sure how big a factor this is, but I suspect it has some bearing on the similar performance.
Old 09-12-2005, 03:35 PM
  #5  
Contributors
 
cobradav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FLA - East Coast, USA
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
Default

545 Rear end ratio:

Auto = 3.23 Tranny - 1st = 4.17; 2nd = 2.34; 3rd = 1.52

Manual = 2.93 Tranny - 1st = 4.04; 2nd = 2.4 ; 3rd = 1.58

Enough to get you to 60 MPH easily. Definitely going to be quicker in 1st gear in auto then things start to even out so any loses in torque converter are made up somewhat. They can afford this higher numerical gearing in the auto because there are two overdrive gears in 5th and 6th.
Old 09-12-2005, 05:03 PM
  #6  
Members
 
alexnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc,usa
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 04 545 jet black/beige, smg sport,premium,sunshades,logic7,cwp,nav,pdc,bluetooth,16.0,light tint all around,Pirelli PZeroNero
Default

Originally Posted by Merv the Derv' date='Sep 12 2005, 05:20 PM
Anyone notice on the old E39 model the 0-60 figures were quite a bit different in terms of the auto being about a second slower than the manual. Now on the E60, which I thought used the same gearboxes, the difference is only 0.2 sec. Has BMW increased the efficiency of their gearboxes or is just wishful thinking?
[snapback]169783[/snapback]
i think the difference in 0-60 for E39 540i sport was 0.1 sec(6.1 against 6.0),not 1 sec-that would be too slow.As to why it is now 0.2 sec-i would not know,i also saw results posted in some mags as manual being slower...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JeremyR
E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods
4
02-06-2016 10:23 AM
ADD
Private Member Classifieds
10
10-15-2015 07:52 PM
wraduenz
Complete Car Sales
7
09-25-2015 07:40 PM
lcc014
DIY: Do It Yourself
0
09-10-2015 05:57 AM
Boost7
Private Member Classifieds
0
09-01-2015 10:35 PM



Quick Reply: Auto v Manual 0-60mph (100km/h)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:47 PM.