E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Anyone ever compare Cobb to JB4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 06:34 AM
  #1  
HP JNKEY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Members
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA.
My Ride: 535i
Model Year: 2011
Default

Currently running Cobb Stage 1 in my 535 but I've heard alot of good stuff about the JB4.

Only other mod is the BMS Dual Cone intake.

Just wondering if there is much difference between the two tunes. You know how it is,

always looking for more.

I'm in Socal so all I can get is 91 octane and that's why I'm running Stage 1 91 tuning.

I've heard that the JB4 pulls harder up top, not sure about down low.

I like the increased sensitivity of the Cobb at light throttle, seems to improve city driving

gas mileage too. Does the JB4 feel the same?

What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 06:59 AM
  #2  
pukka's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
My Ride: 2008 535i: (8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's 1992 Camaro RS: Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
Default

I've been too lazy to install my HP intake so I've been running MAP 1. There is a slight to moderate increase off the line but the big difference is when you accelerate from driving speed. A slight increase on the accelerator and the car takes off.

The JB4 offers a variety of additional functions and several different MAPs depending on your setup. There is a MAP setting to integrate meth-injection as well as a user programmable MAP setting for serious tuners. Best of all its completely removable and can be reused on another x35 with the same motor.

I don't think COBB has all of these features.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
HP JNKEY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Members
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA.
My Ride: 535i
Model Year: 2011
Default

Originally Posted by pukka
I've been too lazy to install my HP intake so I've been running MAP 1. There is a slight to moderate increase off the line but the big difference is when you accelerate from driving speed. A slight increase on the accelerator and the car takes off.

The JB4 offers a variety of additional functions and several different MAPs depending on your setup. There is a MAP setting to integrate meth-injection as well as a user programmable MAP setting for serious tuners. Best of all its completely removable and can be reused on another x35 with the same motor.

I don't think COBB has all of these features.
This is what Terry at BMS sent me:


1) Our lagfix is fairly similar. But a bit smoother than Cobb.

2) CPS is available but not really suggested unless you run poor fuel
or have large turbos. Timing is retarded vs. stock with the JB4.
Generally performance between Cobb and JB4 is fairly similar on pump
gas. The JB4 jumps way ahead on race gas, meth, E85 mixes, etc.

Best,
T
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #4  
onetime's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga
My Ride: 2008 550i sport package
Default

Check out N54tech and you'll see a host of comparisons.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HKninja
Complete Car Sales
10
Mar 8, 2016 09:50 AM
ADD
Private Member Classifieds
10
Oct 15, 2015 07:52 PM
ucsbwsr
E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods
4
Sep 19, 2015 10:58 AM
e60gg
E60 Discussion
6
Sep 3, 2015 05:26 PM
Kbc
E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods
2
Jul 31, 2015 10:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 AM.