E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

550 is now on the BMW NA site

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2005, 12:25 PM
  #41  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by Shebs' date='Sep 2 2005, 04:53 AM
[quote name='teutonictrio' date='Aug 29 2005, 07:05 AM'][quote name='seitch' date='Aug 27 2005, 01:10 AM']Anyone notice that active steering is no longer included with the sport package?? You have to pay extra for it now....
[snapback]163952[/snapback]
Who would want sport package WITHOUT AS?
[snapback]164570[/snapback]
[/quote]

The question should be: "Who would want sport package WITH AS?". AS acts as a rubbery connection between the steering wheel and the road. It decreases the fun of driving.

I would not imagine myself accelerating in a corner and having to readjust the steering wheel angle in my hands to keep the same radius of curvature!

The AS is a good tool for driving in town, but for real sporty driving I don't think it is the best option.

Maybe that is the reason why they took the AS out of the sport package and also the reason that the M5 doesn't come with AS.
[snapback]166206[/snapback]
[/quote]

I like AS fine, but I am not much of a sporty curve driver although I have taken several Bounderant courses. I am more of sporty straight-line driver. What I don't like is that one can't turn traction control completely off without also deactivating stability control. I think that really good drivers would turn both off and would not want AS on a road course.
Old 09-02-2005, 12:36 PM
  #42  
Contributors
 
UUronL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 530i Sport Silver Gray - Black Leather - Anthracite Maple Manual Transmission Premium Audio Cold Weather Package Rear sunshade Sirius Radio Autobahnd Roadblock (3M) film kit
Default

Originally Posted by donv' date='Sep 2 2005, 03:25 PM
[quote name='Shebs' date='Sep 2 2005, 04:53 AM'][quote name='teutonictrio' date='Aug 29 2005, 07:05 AM'][quote name='seitch' date='Aug 27 2005, 01:10 AM']Anyone notice that active steering is no longer included with the sport package?? You have to pay extra for it now....
[snapback]163952[/snapback]
Who would want sport package WITHOUT AS?
[snapback]164570[/snapback]
[/quote]

The question should be: "Who would want sport package WITH AS?". AS acts as a rubbery connection between the steering wheel and the road. It decreases the fun of driving.

I would not imagine myself accelerating in a corner and having to readjust the steering wheel angle in my hands to keep the same radius of curvature!

The AS is a good tool for driving in town, but for real sporty driving I don't think it is the best option.

Maybe that is the reason why they took the AS out of the sport package and also the reason that the M5 doesn't come with AS.
[snapback]166206[/snapback]
[/quote]

I like AS fine, but I am not much of a sporty curve driver although I have taken several Bounderant courses. I am more of sporty straight-line driver. What I don't like is that one can't turn traction control completely off without also deactivating stability control. I think that really good drivers would turn both off and would not want AS on a road course.
[snapback]166354[/snapback]
[/quote]


I value the opinions on this matter from people who have driven AS-DD vs. non-AS DD cars. Most drivers here who have experienced AS and non-AS cars didn't experience a Dynamic Drive non-AS car. Dynamic Drive measurably decreases the amount of steering angle required for a given amount of lateral acceleration (this is the self-steering advantages of Dynamic Drive). So, driving a car without AS -and- without Dynamic Drive gives an exaggerated impression of how much more steering angle is required in a non-AS "sport" configuration.

I can't imagine using less input to drive my car. It requires mere twitches to change course.


I'd be willing to bet the new 550i will be approaching E39 M5 performance levels.
Old 09-02-2005, 12:51 PM
  #43  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

I'd be willing to bet the new 550i will be approaching E39 M5 performance levels.
[snapback]166358[/snapback]
It will be very interesting to see. Above, someone posted the following:

0 - 60 MPH
man/SMG step
545i 5.7 5.8
550i 5.4 5.5

The Table I posted above shows 0 to 60 times for the 545i of 5.2 (step) and 5.4 (not sure). Extrapolating, we might expect (loosely) the 0 to 60 time of the 550i to be 4.9 to 5.1. How do these compare with the E39 M5? They compare favorable with the following specific test results from above.

Chrysler SRT-8 R&T 3/05 425 4.9 13.3 108.2
Chrysler SRT-8 MT 2/05 425 4.9 13.2 108.1
Crossfire SRT-6 MT 8/04 330 4.9 13.3 107.4
Maserati Quattroporte C&D 8/03 ? 4.9 13.2 ?
Mercedes AMG C55 MT 11/04 362 4.9 13.2 107.3
Subaru WRX Sti R&T 6/03 300 4.9 13.3 103
Subaru WRX Sti C&D 2/05 ? 4.9 13.4 ?
Audi S4 MT 8/03 340 5 13.4 105.1
Cadallic CTS-V R&T 2/04 400 5 13.4 109
Ford Mustang GT Conv C&D 6/05 300 5 13.7 103
Maserati Coupe Cambio. R&T 11/02 390 5 13.4 109.6
Maserati Spyder GT R&T 9/03 390 5 13.5 106.3
Mercedes AMG C55 R&T 11/04 362 5 13.5 106.6
Pontiac GTO R&T 7/05 400 5 13.5 107.1
Pontiac GTO MT 2/05 400 5 13.3 107.5
Porsche Boxster S R&T 3/05 280 5 13.4 105
Porsche Boxster S MT 4/05 280 5 13.4 103.9
Porsche Cayenne Turbo R&T 11/03 450 5 13.5 103.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo C&D 8/03 ? 5 13.5 ?
Saleen Mustang MT 4/05 325 ? 5 13.5 103.9
Ford Mustang GT C&D 1/05 300 5.1 13.8 103
Ford Mustang GT MT 1/05 300 5.1 13.5 103.6
Jaguar XJR R&T 6/04 390 5.1 13.5 105.9
Lotus Elise MT 8/04 190 5.1 13.5 102.9
Maserati Quattroporte R&T 12/04 394 5.1 13.6 103.6
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 ? 5.1 13.6 ?
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 276 5.1 13.6 103
Porsche Cayenne Turbo MT 4/05 450 5.1 13.6 101.8
BMW 545i R&T 6/05 325 5.2 13.7 104
Old 09-02-2005, 04:55 PM
  #44  
Contributors
 
UUronL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 530i Sport Silver Gray - Black Leather - Anthracite Maple Manual Transmission Premium Audio Cold Weather Package Rear sunshade Sirius Radio Autobahnd Roadblock (3M) film kit
Default

Originally Posted by donv' date='Sep 2 2005, 03:51 PM
I'd be willing to bet the new 550i will be approaching E39 M5 performance levels.
[snapback]166358[/snapback]
It will be very interesting to see. Above, someone posted the following:

0 - 60 MPH
man/SMG step
545i 5.7 5.8
550i 5.4 5.5

The Table I posted above shows 0 to 60 times for the 545i of 5.2 (step) and 5.4 (not sure). Extrapolating, we might expect (loosely) the 0 to 60 time of the 550i to be 4.9 to 5.1. How do these compare with the E39 M5? They compare favorable with the following specific test results from above.

Chrysler SRT-8 R&T 3/05 425 4.9 13.3 108.2
Chrysler SRT-8 MT 2/05 425 4.9 13.2 108.1
Crossfire SRT-6 MT 8/04 330 4.9 13.3 107.4
Maserati Quattroporte C&D 8/03 ? 4.9 13.2 ?
Mercedes AMG C55 MT 11/04 362 4.9 13.2 107.3
Subaru WRX Sti R&T 6/03 300 4.9 13.3 103
Subaru WRX Sti C&D 2/05 ? 4.9 13.4 ?
Audi S4 MT 8/03 340 5 13.4 105.1
Cadallic CTS-V R&T 2/04 400 5 13.4 109
Ford Mustang GT Conv C&D 6/05 300 5 13.7 103
Maserati Coupe Cambio. R&T 11/02 390 5 13.4 109.6
Maserati Spyder GT R&T 9/03 390 5 13.5 106.3
Mercedes AMG C55 R&T 11/04 362 5 13.5 106.6
Pontiac GTO R&T 7/05 400 5 13.5 107.1
Pontiac GTO MT 2/05 400 5 13.3 107.5
Porsche Boxster S R&T 3/05 280 5 13.4 105
Porsche Boxster S MT 4/05 280 5 13.4 103.9
Porsche Cayenne Turbo R&T 11/03 450 5 13.5 103.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo C&D 8/03 ? 5 13.5 ?
Saleen Mustang MT 4/05 325 ? 5 13.5 103.9
Ford Mustang GT C&D 1/05 300 5.1 13.8 103
Ford Mustang GT MT 1/05 300 5.1 13.5 103.6
Jaguar XJR R&T 6/04 390 5.1 13.5 105.9
Lotus Elise MT 8/04 190 5.1 13.5 102.9
Maserati Quattroporte R&T 12/04 394 5.1 13.6 103.6
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 ? 5.1 13.6 ?
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 276 5.1 13.6 103
Porsche Cayenne Turbo MT 4/05 450 5.1 13.6 101.8
BMW 545i R&T 6/05 325 5.2 13.7 104
[snapback]166371[/snapback]


Car and Driver's last E39 M5 went 0-60 in 4.9 - quarter mile in 13.4 @ 108mph. The first one they tested was 4.8 13.3 @108. Either way I think those sound reasonable for the 550i. I think 35hp is good for 3-tenths of a second 0-60.

Roadholding for the M5 was .90g, which is what the US sport package does - the M sport may do better - I've never seen test figures on it.
Old 09-02-2005, 05:27 PM
  #45  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by UUronL' date='Sep 2 2005, 07:55 PM
[quote name='donv' date='Sep 2 2005, 03:51 PM']
I'd be willing to bet the new 550i will be approaching E39 M5 performance levels.
[snapback]166358[/snapback]
It will be very interesting to see. Above, someone posted the following:

0 - 60 MPH
man/SMG step
545i 5.7 5.8
550i 5.4 5.5

The Table I posted above shows 0 to 60 times for the 545i of 5.2 (step) and 5.4 (not sure). Extrapolating, we might expect (loosely) the 0 to 60 time of the 550i to be 4.9 to 5.1. How do these compare with the E39 M5? They compare favorable with the following specific test results from above.

Chrysler SRT-8 R&T 3/05 425 4.9 13.3 108.2
Chrysler SRT-8 MT 2/05 425 4.9 13.2 108.1
Crossfire SRT-6 MT 8/04 330 4.9 13.3 107.4
Maserati Quattroporte C&D 8/03 ? 4.9 13.2 ?
Mercedes AMG C55 MT 11/04 362 4.9 13.2 107.3
Subaru WRX Sti R&T 6/03 300 4.9 13.3 103
Subaru WRX Sti C&D 2/05 ? 4.9 13.4 ?
Audi S4 MT 8/03 340 5 13.4 105.1
Cadallic CTS-V R&T 2/04 400 5 13.4 109
Ford Mustang GT Conv C&D 6/05 300 5 13.7 103
Maserati Coupe Cambio. R&T 11/02 390 5 13.4 109.6
Maserati Spyder GT R&T 9/03 390 5 13.5 106.3
Mercedes AMG C55 R&T 11/04 362 5 13.5 106.6
Pontiac GTO R&T 7/05 400 5 13.5 107.1
Pontiac GTO MT 2/05 400 5 13.3 107.5
Porsche Boxster S R&T 3/05 280 5 13.4 105
Porsche Boxster S MT 4/05 280 5 13.4 103.9
Porsche Cayenne Turbo R&T 11/03 450 5 13.5 103.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo C&D 8/03 ? 5 13.5 ?
Saleen Mustang MT 4/05 325 ? 5 13.5 103.9
Ford Mustang GT C&D 1/05 300 5.1 13.8 103
Ford Mustang GT MT 1/05 300 5.1 13.5 103.6
Jaguar XJR R&T 6/04 390 5.1 13.5 105.9
Lotus Elise MT 8/04 190 5.1 13.5 102.9
Maserati Quattroporte R&T 12/04 394 5.1 13.6 103.6
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 ? 5.1 13.6 ?
Porsche Boxster S C&D 3/05 276 5.1 13.6 103
Porsche Cayenne Turbo MT 4/05 450 5.1 13.6 101.8
BMW 545i R&T 6/05 325 5.2 13.7 104
[snapback]166371[/snapback]


Car and Driver's last E39 M5 went 0-60 in 4.9 - quarter mile in 13.4 @ 108mph. The first one they tested was 4.8 13.3 @108. Either way I think those sound reasonable for the 550i. I think 35hp is good for 3-tenths of a second 0-60.

Roadholding for the M5 was .90g, which is what the US sport package does - the M sport may do better - I've never seen test figures on it.
[snapback]166451[/snapback]
[/quote]

What you said earlier now makes perfect sense. The E39 M5 fits right into the group posted above--toward the faster end, of course. I always think, similar to you, of about 10 good HP as yielding about .1 improvement.
Old 09-02-2005, 10:30 PM
  #46  
Senior Members
 
Shebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 523iA, 2006, Silver Grey, Black Leatherette Interior, Fine-Wood Trim Poplar Grain Brown High-Gloss, 6 Speed Automatic Transmission with Steptronic, Automatic Air Conditioning with Extended Content, Interior and Exterior Mirrors with Automatic Anti-Dazzle Function (Incl. Folding Function for Exterior Mirror), Electric Front Seats with Memory for Driver, Multi-Function Steering Wheel with Cruise Control, Adjustable Steering Column, BMW Radio with 8 Speakers and CD Drive, Park Distance Control, Universal Bluetooth Cell Phone, Electric Rear Sunblind
Default

Originally Posted by 300TTto545' date='Sep 2 2005, 02:43 PM
[quote name='Shebs' date='Sep 2 2005, 03:53 AM'][quote name='teutonictrio' date='Aug 29 2005, 07:05 AM'][quote name='seitch' date='Aug 27 2005, 01:10 AM']Anyone notice that active steering is no longer included with the sport package?? You have to pay extra for it now....
[snapback]163952[/snapback]
Who would want sport package WITHOUT AS?
[snapback]164570[/snapback]
[/quote]

The question should be: "Who would want sport package WITH AS?". AS acts as a rubbery connection between the steering wheel and the road. It decreases the fun of driving.

I would not imagine myself accelerating in a corner and having to readjust the steering wheel angle in my hands to keep the same radius of curvature!

The AS is a good tool for driving in town, but for real sporty driving I don't think it is the best option.

Maybe that is the reason why they took the AS out of the sport package and also the reason that the M5 doesn't come with AS.
[snapback]166206[/snapback]
[/quote]

Let's not start this again. The 2nd paragraph illustrates the misconceptions. If the radius doesn't change, the steering wheel does not need to change (unless you are sliding....)
[snapback]166212[/snapback]
[/quote]

I stated that if I am accelerating through a corner (i.e. I am increasing my speed), the steering ratio would change during the same corner.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TroyE60
Private Member Classifieds
9
05-30-2019 05:01 PM
JonathonK
Other BMW Models
0
03-27-2015 08:13 AM
rocksteady530
Tires & Wheels
0
03-04-2015 12:16 PM
reckamech
E60 Discussion
1
09-08-2003 01:24 PM
das
Press Articles & Your Comments
1
07-15-2003 08:36 PM



Quick Reply: 550 is now on the BMW NA site



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 PM.