E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

535d vs M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2005, 12:50 PM
  #21  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rich535d' post='205799' date='Dec 1 2005, 04:49 PM
I agree that the times of many of the cars seem strange. Look at the time of the M3 CSL (1.28) vs. the standard M3 (1.31.8). Thats a very big difference.
The M3 CSL was in wet and the M3 was in dry. That's a fact.
The 911 gt3 also was in wet 1 27.2.
Old 12-01-2005, 01:20 PM
  #22  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='205797
Originally Posted by JayJay' post='205763' date='Dec 1 2005, 12:04 PM
It could be that the torque through 50-70 is where the car spends most of its time on the track so the 535 has an extra bit of speed in this area but only this area so keeps up with the M3 time wise. If the entire track was between 50 - 70mph corners then the 535d would be faster surely?

or is there a flaw in my logic

oh and RIP Black stig

your launch off an aircraft carrier was a noble way to go :-(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/downloads/rip...g_broadband.ram
Keeping the M3 up in the rev band would more than make up for the torque differences, I suspect it's just down to driver and track conditions. On the day anything and anyone can beat anything and anyone, as an example take a look at Sheb's post on another thread about the Maserati Quattroporte recording a time that equalled or beat the E60 M5 around one magazine's test track.
Oh come on...please don't revive that post again...nothing creative is achived in that dbate.
IMO, as i am a tg fan, it could be as jet190rs said, the change in drivers. Otherwise i can't see the difference. For sure the M3 could make out the torque difference by just keeping the rev band. Dunno...i for one think so, that the change (if they changed) of drivers.
Bare in mind that the lap times on their site are not stated with dry/wet lap. I think that's why we see the same time for the sl55 with the golf r32. If i remember corectly the sl test was in wet and for sure the golf's one was in dry.
[/quote]

The point is that simply that one lap and one test, in itself, is pretty meaningless as there are so many variables from driver to conditions that will differ from test to test. Multiple tests will show that the M3 is much quicker, and of course the QP isn't going to get close to the M5 95 times out of a hundred (but I still want a QP ), but on one test, and one lap anything can happen, hence the "anomalies" like this. These tests aren't run under laboratory conditions!!
Old 12-01-2005, 02:34 PM
  #23  
Senior Members
 
jet190rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: '05 545i - scheduled for ED pickup in Munich on 7/22!
Default

Have you guys watched the videos?

The Black Stig and the White Stig don't even drive the same lines on the track.
Old 12-02-2005, 02:18 AM
  #24  
Members
 
juliann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cornwall / Suffolk UK
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535d Sport Tourer - E34 M5 Race Car
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' post='205801
I agree that the times of many of the cars seem strange. Look at the time of the M3 CSL (1.28) vs. the standard M3 (1.31.8). Thats a very big difference.
The M3 CSL was in wet and the M3 was in dry. That's a fact.
The 911 gt3 also was in wet 1 27.2.
[/quote]

The CSL is soooo much quicker than the M3 on track - not just due to the Cup tyres & extra power/wt ratio but predominantly as the whole package is so much more confidence inspiring that it is easier to drive quicker.

I was wrong about the 535d being in kickdown for the 50-70mph time, tried it this morning in 6th - just over 3 secs - effortless !
Old 12-02-2005, 04:59 AM
  #25  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by juliann' post='206022
Originally Posted by Rich535d' post='205799' date='Dec 1 2005, 04:49 PM
I agree that the times of many of the cars seem strange. Look at the time of the M3 CSL (1.28) vs. the standard M3 (1.31.8). Thats a very big difference.
The M3 CSL was in wet and the M3 was in dry. That's a fact.
The 911 gt3 also was in wet 1 27.2.
The CSL is soooo much quicker than the M3 on track - not just due to the Cup tyres & extra power/wt ratio but predominantly as the whole package is so much more confidence inspiring that it is easier to drive quicker.

I was wrong about the 535d being in kickdown for the 50-70mph time, tried it this morning in 6th - just over 3 secs - effortless !
[/quote]
yes, tryed it also...the same result. Who needs kickdown when we have all the torque? 2 sequential turbos mean the entire rev band to explore. So in any rev range in any gear the 535d is quick.


Originally Posted by jet190rs' post='205839' date='Dec 1 2005, 06:34 PM
Have you guys watched the videos?

The Black Stig and the White Stig don't even drive the same lines on the track.
Yes i watched again with more attention and indeed they are very different in lines, driving styles. That must be it for the equal times.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jashy247
Private Member Classifieds
1
02-23-2021 05:50 PM
phillc
E60 Discussion
2
09-28-2015 12:11 AM
Inty
E61 Touring Discussion
3
08-12-2015 11:51 PM



Quick Reply: 535d vs M3



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:22 AM.