The Competition Discuss the competition to the BMW 5 Series here. Mercedes, Audi, etc...

The press' first impressions of the Panamera are no surprise...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2009, 01:31 PM
  #1  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
550isport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My Ride: 07' 550i sport; Sapphire Black/Auburn; sport package; steptronic; navigation with R.T.T.I.; heads up; cold weather package; Logic-7; BMW MOST ipod kit; Motorola V3 snap-in adapter; rear heated seats and rear shades; anthracite headliner; sirrius sat. radio; M-aero kit; OEM style 166 Wheels with 245/35-19 front and 285/30-19 rear Michelin PS2s.
Default

Not to be a know-it-all, but I suspected that the Panamera might befall the same fate as the Cayenne. And the first drives seem to be confirming my suspicions. I love Porsche for its sports cars. The 911 offers a unique experience in that it is very light and has its engine over the rear axle, a trait which Porsche has near perfected through persistent engineering over the last 4 decades. None of these qualities apply to the Cayenne or Panamera. Those expecting Porsche to work magic with these two cars are right to be frustrated. The GTS is a brilliant ride, but apples to apples, a Cayenne S is no better than an X5. Its not that the Cayennes are bad, they're just not exceptionally good. And I think the same thing is about to happen with the Panamera. I thought for sure the Panamera would outsmart the M5 in its design and execution and offer a solution that was sportier than the M but as comfortable. It seems the opposite is true. The S and 4S panameras are reportedly not that fast (like the Cayenne S), and particularly comfortable perhaps at the expense of some road feel.

But all is not lost! If all goes to plan, the same whordes of buyers will line up to buy, not the car, but the brand. A local private porsche repair shop owner explained it best to me: he said - I have customers that just love their 911s but they can't drive them everyday because of practical limitations so they go out and get a Cayenne for themselves or their significant others. Its the 911 for the weekdays. - In other words they're just staying brand loyal. And I get that. And I think much of panamera sales will fall in that same category - purchases made out of brand loyalty irrespective of the car's performance relative to its competitors. And as with the Cayenne, the turbo's acceleration numbers will save the car from a lambbasting in the magazines and in the minds of car guys across the country. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Take the hp away and what do you have? I always found it telling how much people rave about 5 series with the smaller engines.

Anyway. Porsche will line its pockets with profits from the Panamera as it has done with the overpriced Cayenne and use its coffers to continue to develop the 911. Every cloud has a silver lining

My2C
DRP
Old 07-01-2009, 02:12 PM
  #2  
Senior Members
 
Richard in NC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 BMW 550i 2006 BMW X3
Default

Originally Posted by 550isport' post='929835' date='Jul 1 2009, 05:31 PM
Not to be a know-it-all, but I suspected that the Panamera might befall the same fate as the Cayenne. And the first drives seem to be confirming my suspicions. I love Porsche for its sports cars. The 911 offers a unique experience in that it is very light and has its engine over the rear axle, a trait which Porsche has near perfected through persistent engineering over the last 4 decades. None of these qualities apply to the Cayenne or Panamera. Those expecting Porsche to work magic with these two cars are right to be frustrated. The GTS is a brilliant ride, but apples to apples, a Cayenne S is no better than an X5. Its not that the Cayennes are bad, they're just not exceptionally good. And I think the same thing is about to happen with the Panamera. I thought for sure the Panamera would outsmart the M5 in its design and execution and offer a solution that was sportier than the M but as comfortable. It seems the opposite is true. The S and 4S panameras are reportedly not that fast (like the Cayenne S), and particularly comfortable perhaps at the expense of some road feel.

But all is not lost! If all goes to plan, the same whordes of buyers will line up to buy, not the car, but the brand. A local private porsche repair shop owner explained it best to me: he said - I have customers that just love their 911s but they can't drive them everyday because of practical limitations so they go out and get a Cayenne for themselves or their significant others. Its the 911 for the weekdays. - In other words they're just staying brand loyal. And I get that. And I think much of panamera sales will fall in that same category - purchases made out of brand loyalty irrespective of the car's performance relative to its competitors. And as with the Cayenne, the turbo's acceleration numbers will save the car from a lambbasting in the magazines and in the minds of car guys across the country. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Take the hp away and what do you have? I always found it telling how much people rave about 5 series with the smaller engines.

Anyway. Porsche will line its pockets with profits from the Panamera as it has done with the overpriced Cayenne and use its coffers to continue to develop the 911. Every cloud has a silver lining

My2C
DRP
Here is a possibility. If most of the Cayenne sales are loyalty sales, than those same people will now buy Panameras instead, cutting Cayenne sales in half. Bottom line, total Porsche sales may not go up by much.
Old 07-01-2009, 02:28 PM
  #3  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Take a look at these reviews:

Motor Trend

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...view/index.html

"The Panamera is a truly epic automobile"


Autoblog

The author of the Autoblog review actually posts on Bimmerfest (his username is Emission).

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/25/first-d...78-years-in-th/

"We believe that time will once again vindicate Porsche's latest decision to hurl itself into the competitive luxury sport sedan segment. Our three days with the Panamera left little doubt that Porsche has achieved its program objectives in its first-round attempt. Not only is it painstakingly engineered and truly enjoyable to drive... most importantly, the all-new Panamera has earned the right to wear the Porsche badge."

"Unlike the BMW M5, Audi S6, and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG -- all competent family sedans gussied-up to masquerade as sport sedans -- the Porsche Panamera is built with the sole objective of being the only clean-sheet high performance sport sedan in the segment. Even the Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG, arguably one of the Panamera's closest competitors, pales in performance."


From one of his posts on Bimmerfest - "Try to find one negative review of the Panamera by someone who has actually DRIVEN one. The car may be ugly and expensive, but it kicks ass.)"


LA Times

Here's Dan Neil from the LA Times' review. Dan remains the only auto journalist who has won the Pulitzer Prize.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-neil...,1017349.column

"The new Porsche Panamera is the best-handling big sedan in the world", although Dan Neil is a 911 guy and can't resist making the comparisons when he goes on to say "The damned car is magnificent." before adding "But it is not made of the same charmed isotopes as the 911, and therefore not a Porsche. Sorry."
Old 07-02-2009, 05:34 AM
  #4  
Contributors
 
m630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting comments, I've also read a bunch and the car does sound interesting, though it is butt ugly for no reason at all....but its also BS that the car is a clean sheet sedan made strictly for pure performance; it was stated that they will also offer the car as a 6 cyl using a VW engine? or something like that from what I had read in the past, so if thats still the case, its just a porschephile overlooking facts to make their point...Im sure it will be a very good sports saloon, but I just dont see the need to dis on the King M5 which is the Ultimate Sports Saloon (sorry no masquerading with the E60) regardless of the P-car marketing machines states, once it beats the next gen head to head, then perhaps they can talk, but for now, its still up in the air as to whether this thing will survive long term, and it definitely needs a rework of the sheetmetal, just look at how beautiful AM did it, this thing has nothing on the Rapide in terms of looks
Old 07-02-2009, 06:41 AM
  #5  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by m630' post='930484' date='Jul 2 2009, 06:34 AM
Interesting comments, I've also read a bunch and the car does sound interesting, though it is butt ugly for no reason at all....but its also BS that the car is a clean sheet sedan made strictly for pure performance; it was stated that they will also offer the car as a 6 cyl using a VW engine? or something like that from what I had read in the past, so if thats still the case, its just a porschephile overlooking facts to make their point...Im sure it will be a very good sports saloon, but I just dont see the need to dis on the King M5 which is the Ultimate Sports Saloon (sorry no masquerading with the E60) regardless of the P-car marketing machines states, once it beats the next gen head to head, then perhaps they can talk, but for now, its still up in the air as to whether this thing will survive long term, and it definitely needs a rework of the sheetmetal, just look at how beautiful AM did it, this thing has nothing on the Rapide in terms of looks
Time will tell who's right. My money is on Porsche. For now, one thing is clear. A Panamera Turbo is quicker, by a significant margin, than any class competitor (from BMW or otherwise) and it appears to have a handling advantage over its competitors. As for form following function, it's reportedly true.
Old 07-02-2009, 07:22 AM
  #6  
Contributors
 
DRANGED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MPLS, USA
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='929872' date='Jul 1 2009, 05:28 PM
Take a look at these reviews:

Motor Trend

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...view/index.html

"The Panamera is a truly epic automobile"


Autoblog

The author of the Autoblog review actually posts on Bimmerfest (his username is Emission).

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/25/first-d...78-years-in-th/

"We believe that time will once again vindicate Porsche's latest decision to hurl itself into the competitive luxury sport sedan segment. Our three days with the Panamera left little doubt that Porsche has achieved its program objectives in its first-round attempt. Not only is it painstakingly engineered and truly enjoyable to drive... most importantly, the all-new Panamera has earned the right to wear the Porsche badge."

"Unlike the BMW M5, Audi S6, and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG -- all competent family sedans gussied-up to masquerade as sport sedans -- the Porsche Panamera is built with the sole objective of being the only clean-sheet high performance sport sedan in the segment. Even the Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG, arguably one of the Panamera's closest competitors, pales in performance."


From one of his posts on Bimmerfest - "Try to find one negative review of the Panamera by someone who has actually DRIVEN one. The car may be ugly and expensive, but it kicks ass.)"


LA Times

Here's Dan Neil from the LA Times' review. Dan remains the only auto journalist who has won the Pulitzer Prize.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-neil...,1017349.column

"The new Porsche Panamera is the best-handling big sedan in the world", although Dan Neil is a 911 guy and can't resist making the comparisons when he goes on to say "The damned car is magnificent." before adding "But it is not made of the same charmed isotopes as the 911, and therefore not a Porsche. Sorry."
Kool-aid drinker.
Old 07-02-2009, 07:51 AM
  #7  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='930621' date='Jul 2 2009, 08:22 AM
Kool-aid drinker.
Old 07-02-2009, 10:04 AM
  #8  
Contributors
 
m630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='930564' date='Jul 2 2009, 10:41 AM
Time will tell who's right. My money is on Porsche. For now, one thing is clear. A Panamera Turbo is quicker, by a significant margin, than any class competitor (from BMW or otherwise) and it appears to have a handling advantage over its competitors. As for form following function, it's reportedly true.

definitely time will tell...I do think it looks good from the front and the interior looks very nice, but the functionality of the form and its real necessity is still tbd......I still think someone who really needs seating for 4 adults regularly would choose a 760li or S600 type vehicle over this....this is trying to out do the M5 and attract its clientele as far as I can figure, as no one in the mind set (or tax bracket) for a Rapide or Flying Spur would really consider this, imho...
Old 07-05-2009, 11:43 AM
  #9  
Senior Members
 
pipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 525
Default

i have no doubt that the car will drive great...but why does it have to be so darn ugly???
Old 07-05-2009, 04:18 PM
  #10  
Contributors
 
sdg1871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: See my signature
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='930564' date='Jul 2 2009, 10:41 AM
Time will tell who's right. My money is on Porsche. For now, one thing is clear. A Panamera Turbo is quicker, by a significant margin, than any class competitor (from BMW or otherwise) and it appears to have a handling advantage over its competitors. As for form following function, it's reportedly true.
The Panamera should be a blast to drive. Porsche reall knows how to make a car that is ultra-fast and that handles. I wish that the car looked better than it does. That being said, the F10, at least in spy shots, is no beauty.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Classifieds
0
09-10-2015 06:39 AM
ka2er
New Member Introductions
1
08-03-2015 10:09 AM
w84me
E60 Discussion
0
07-10-2015 10:56 AM
wassy
E60 Discussion
24
01-21-2005 06:59 PM
bimmerhitman
E60 Discussion
7
03-28-2004 01:52 AM



Quick Reply: The press' first impressions of the Panamera are no surprise...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 PM.