Press Articles & Your Comments Post links to 5 Series related magazine articles along with your commentary.

Studless; RFT and Normal.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2005, 03:39 AM
  #1  
Members
Thread Starter
 
ryo29002000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Japan,Asia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Although it is Japanese, please make it reference.

[Contents]:Intro → RFT → Normal



http://211.10.2.99/200501/050205_bmw001.mov
Old 10-15-2005, 04:33 AM
  #2  
Contributors
 
amigo525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY (USA)
Posts: 3,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ryo29002000jp' date='Oct 15 2005, 05:39 AM
Although it is Japanese, please make it reference.

[Contents]:Intro → RFT → Normal



http://211.10.2.99/200501/050205_bmw001.mov
[snapback]184552[/snapback]
Nice video.......also...i could understand everything they say Well..i could not understand but i could guess they were saying "what a nice machine to ride...it feels so god to driver in any condition'
Old 10-15-2005, 03:29 PM
  #3  
Contributors
 
EBMCS03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Default

So? the run flats did better... it was able to turn right? Still looked like it was sliding tho...
Old 10-16-2005, 02:13 AM
  #4  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ryo29002000jp' date='Oct 15 2005, 06:39 AM
Although it is Japanese, please make it reference.

[Contents]:Intro → RFT → Normal



http://211.10.2.99/200501/050205_bmw001.mov
[snapback]184552[/snapback]
SO?

What's with that? We all know RFT are better than non rft just because you can go on even if you have loose all the air. But that doesn't mean they are better tires overall than non rft ones. The snow test was almost the same thing as in the dry test. You can't move on, if you loose all the air in a non rft, and it won't matter if it's in snow or dry. With a rft you can move on...that's the point of the rft.

But of course, for racing hard on dry tarmac i still support the non rft. IMO the only advantage that you get with the rft is the ability to keep going, either that that only disadvantages.
Old 10-16-2005, 03:01 AM
  #5  
Senior Members
 
IrishEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dublin, Eire
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: Collected Sept 2009 - BMW E90 M3, Silverstone II, Novillo Black leather, 19" M Double-Spoke alloys, High Beam Assist, Electronic Damper Control, Voice Control, PDC, USB, DAB, High Gloss Shadowline, Sliding armrest, Trim Finishing in aluminium grey.
Default

Originally Posted by BetterMakeWay' date='Oct 16 2005, 11:13 AM
[quote name='ryo29002000jp' date='Oct 15 2005, 06:39 AM']Although it is Japanese, please make it reference.

[Contents]:Intro → RFT → Normal



http://211.10.2.99/200501/050205_bmw001.mov
[snapback]184552[/snapback]
SO?

What's with that? We all know RFT are better than non rft just because you can go on even if you have loose all the air. But that doesn't mean they are better tires overall than non rft ones. The snow test was almost the same thing as in the dry test. You can't move on, if you loose all the air in a non rft, and it won't matter if it's in snow or dry. With a rft you can move on...that's the point of the rft.

But of course, for racing hard on dry tarmac i still support the non rft. IMO the only advantage that you get with the rft is the ability to keep going, either that that only disadvantages.
[snapback]184846[/snapback]
[/quote]

Likewise? We all knew that's what run-flats are about. Go when punctured.

I swapped RFT's for non-RFT's as I reckon the advantages of non-RFT's are greater than the disadvantages. Nobody likes getting a puncture and having to stop, at possibly some dangerous location, to change. Even with a RFT puncture, you still have to change the tyre at some stage and possibly replace the whole tyre at somewhat more expense.

However, I've had two punctures in 5 years and the last one was in 2003. (Blast. Maybe I'm due one now. Give my my RF's back ). So I think I'll take the chance, hope that I don't get one soon and enjoy the relative quietness and comfort that the RFT's cannot give. Neither will I be travelling in avalanches of snow so there is not the requirement there. Maybe, with the next generation of RFT's when they achieve peace and quietness, I'll change back.

Old 10-16-2005, 03:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Members
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IrishEyes' date='Oct 16 2005, 06:01 AM
[quote name='BetterMakeWay' date='Oct 16 2005, 11:13 AM'][quote name='ryo29002000jp' date='Oct 15 2005, 06:39 AM']Although it is Japanese, please make it reference.

[Contents]:Intro → RFT → Normal



http://211.10.2.99/200501/050205_bmw001.mov
[snapback]184552[/snapback]
SO?

What's with that? We all know RFT are better than non rft just because you can go on even if you have loose all the air. But that doesn't mean they are better tires overall than non rft ones. The snow test was almost the same thing as in the dry test. You can't move on, if you loose all the air in a non rft, and it won't matter if it's in snow or dry. With a rft you can move on...that's the point of the rft.

But of course, for racing hard on dry tarmac i still support the non rft. IMO the only advantage that you get with the rft is the ability to keep going, either that that only disadvantages.
[snapback]184846[/snapback]
[/quote]

Likewise? We all knew that's what run-flats are about. Go when punctured.

I swapped RFT's for non-RFT's as I reckon the advantages of non-RFT's are greater than the disadvantages. Nobody likes getting a puncture and having to stop, at possibly some dangerous location, to change. Even with a RFT puncture, you still have to change the tyre at some stage and possibly replace the whole tyre at somewhat more expense.

However, I've had two punctures in 5 years and the last one was in 2003. (Blast. Maybe I'm due one now. Give my my RF's back ). So I think I'll take the chance, hope that I don't get one soon and enjoy the relative quietness and comfort that the RFT's cannot give. Neither will I be travelling in avalanches of snow so there is not the requirement there. Maybe, with the next generation of RFT's when they achieve peace and quietness, I'll change back.


[snapback]184849[/snapback]
[/quote]

Maybe, with the next generation of RFT's when they achieve peace and quietness, I'll change back.
And maybe ride comfort...those reinforced sidewalls sure are stiff as hell.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fabolous531
E60 Discussion
4
10-18-2015 12:22 PM
1BFL
E61 Touring Discussion
8
09-28-2015 11:10 AM
Yournamehere
Tires & Wheels
5
09-04-2015 03:52 AM
bifajv
E60 Discussion
14
07-30-2015 05:37 PM
CertifiedOfficial
Private Member Classifieds
5
05-21-2015 12:42 AM



Quick Reply: Studless; RFT and Normal.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM.