The highest form of flattery...is to copy a BMW.
03-20-2007, 10:13 PM
#1
Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baton Rouge LA, USA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 545i, Jet Black, Auburn leather, Sport, Premium, Cold Weather, Prem Sound, Steptronic, PDC, Comfort Seats, NAV, Shades, SAT
2006 325i Cabrio, Electric Red, Beige leather, Sport, Premium, Prem Sound, Steptronic, Heated seats
Previous Bimmers:
2004 330i ZHP, Imola Red, Black leather, Premium, Steptronic, Heated seats
2002 325i, Orient Blue, Beige leather, Premium
Sat, 2007-03-17 11:39
Business News
TORONTO (CP) -
The ruling by Federal Court Justice W. Andrew MacKay found that the use of the letter by Infiniti, the premium brand of Japanese carmaker Nissan, "in form similar to that of the plaintiffs' trademark M alone, and its use of M6 as a package for modifying one of its vehicles, cause confusion in Canada between the sources of the wares of the defendant and the wares of the plaintiffs."
BMW has been adding M badges to souped-up versions of its already high-performance cars since 1978 in Germany and 1987 in Canada, when the M6 arrived, followed by the M3, the M5 and other variants.
The German carmaker argued that these vehicles have come to be known, "particularly by auto journalists and car enthusiasts," as M cars which enhance the image and sales of the rest of its fleet.
Infiniti, meanwhile, registered M45 in 2004 and M35 in 2005 as trademarks for sedans in the middle of its range, and in some advertising has used the letter M alone. It also offered an M6 sport package for its lower-priced G35.
The judge found Nissan "liable, in damages to be determined . . . for the use of the letter M and the descriptor M6, as trademarks for automobiles, parts and accessories, which caused a likelihood of confusion between the sources of its wares and of BMW's."
Nissan was barred from directing public attention to its products in any way likely to cause confusion.
"The defendant is also ordered to deliver to the plaintiffs or to destroy under oath, all literature, invoices, packaging, signs, advertisements, promotional or marketing material, printed or otherwise recorded, in the possession, custody or control of the defendant which may be considered to offend the injunction now granted."
Submissions will be considered later on monetary damages and legal costs.
Business News
TORONTO (CP) -
The ruling by Federal Court Justice W. Andrew MacKay found that the use of the letter by Infiniti, the premium brand of Japanese carmaker Nissan, "in form similar to that of the plaintiffs' trademark M alone, and its use of M6 as a package for modifying one of its vehicles, cause confusion in Canada between the sources of the wares of the defendant and the wares of the plaintiffs."
BMW has been adding M badges to souped-up versions of its already high-performance cars since 1978 in Germany and 1987 in Canada, when the M6 arrived, followed by the M3, the M5 and other variants.
The German carmaker argued that these vehicles have come to be known, "particularly by auto journalists and car enthusiasts," as M cars which enhance the image and sales of the rest of its fleet.
Infiniti, meanwhile, registered M45 in 2004 and M35 in 2005 as trademarks for sedans in the middle of its range, and in some advertising has used the letter M alone. It also offered an M6 sport package for its lower-priced G35.
The judge found Nissan "liable, in damages to be determined . . . for the use of the letter M and the descriptor M6, as trademarks for automobiles, parts and accessories, which caused a likelihood of confusion between the sources of its wares and of BMW's."
Nissan was barred from directing public attention to its products in any way likely to cause confusion.
"The defendant is also ordered to deliver to the plaintiffs or to destroy under oath, all literature, invoices, packaging, signs, advertisements, promotional or marketing material, printed or otherwise recorded, in the possession, custody or control of the defendant which may be considered to offend the injunction now granted."
Submissions will be considered later on monetary damages and legal costs.
03-20-2007, 10:46 PM
#2
Members
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 520i
History: Ford Cougar -00, Volvo S40 -04, Renault Laguna -03, Citroën Xsara -98, Citröen ZX -93, Citröen BX -88
Another bunch of lawyers getting some fat salaries...
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
03-20-2007, 10:50 PM
#3
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: E61 535d Apr 05. UK spec + Media Pack, Luxury Pack & Visibility Pack
Not all that surprising, given that in the mid '90s Audi won a similar battle against Volvo for the use of the labels "S4" and "S6". But it serves Renault well! 
03-21-2007, 02:11 AM
#4
Senior Members
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bedford, MA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 530i 6-speed Titanium Silver/Black Interior
Premium Package
Sport Package
Aux input
30 GB video iPod
Cold Weather Package
Xenon
Red rear reflectors
Tint
Clear Bra
Infiniti did the same to Audi with "Q" on their new SUVs.
03-21-2007, 02:36 AM
#5
Senior Members
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by g8ordoc' post='405206' date='Mar 21 2007, 01:13 AM
Sat, 2007-03-17 11:39
Business News
TORONTO (CP) -
The ruling by Federal Court Justice W. Andrew MacKay found that the use of the letter by Infiniti, the premium brand of Japanese carmaker Nissan, "in form similar to that of the plaintiffs' trademark M alone, and its use of M6 as a package for modifying one of its vehicles, cause confusion in Canada between the sources of the wares of the defendant and the wares of the plaintiffs."
BMW has been adding M badges to souped-up versions of its already high-performance cars since 1978 in Germany and 1987 in Canada, when the M6 arrived, followed by the M3, the M5 and other variants.
The German carmaker argued that these vehicles have come to be known, "particularly by auto journalists and car enthusiasts," as M cars which enhance the image and sales of the rest of its fleet.
Infiniti, meanwhile, registered M45 in 2004 and M35 in 2005 as trademarks for sedans in the middle of its range, and in some advertising has used the letter M alone. It also offered an M6 sport package for its lower-priced G35.
The judge found Nissan "liable, in damages to be determined . . . for the use of the letter M and the descriptor M6, as trademarks for automobiles, parts and accessories, which caused a likelihood of confusion between the sources of its wares and of BMW's."
Nissan was barred from directing public attention to its products in any way likely to cause confusion.
"The defendant is also ordered to deliver to the plaintiffs or to destroy under oath, all literature, invoices, packaging, signs, advertisements, promotional or marketing material, printed or otherwise recorded, in the possession, custody or control of the defendant which may be considered to offend the injunction now granted."
Submissions will be considered later on monetary damages and legal costs.
Business News
TORONTO (CP) -
The ruling by Federal Court Justice W. Andrew MacKay found that the use of the letter by Infiniti, the premium brand of Japanese carmaker Nissan, "in form similar to that of the plaintiffs' trademark M alone, and its use of M6 as a package for modifying one of its vehicles, cause confusion in Canada between the sources of the wares of the defendant and the wares of the plaintiffs."
BMW has been adding M badges to souped-up versions of its already high-performance cars since 1978 in Germany and 1987 in Canada, when the M6 arrived, followed by the M3, the M5 and other variants.
The German carmaker argued that these vehicles have come to be known, "particularly by auto journalists and car enthusiasts," as M cars which enhance the image and sales of the rest of its fleet.
Infiniti, meanwhile, registered M45 in 2004 and M35 in 2005 as trademarks for sedans in the middle of its range, and in some advertising has used the letter M alone. It also offered an M6 sport package for its lower-priced G35.
The judge found Nissan "liable, in damages to be determined . . . for the use of the letter M and the descriptor M6, as trademarks for automobiles, parts and accessories, which caused a likelihood of confusion between the sources of its wares and of BMW's."
Nissan was barred from directing public attention to its products in any way likely to cause confusion.
"The defendant is also ordered to deliver to the plaintiffs or to destroy under oath, all literature, invoices, packaging, signs, advertisements, promotional or marketing material, printed or otherwise recorded, in the possession, custody or control of the defendant which may be considered to offend the injunction now granted."
Submissions will be considered later on monetary damages and legal costs.
What about PONTIAC copying-BMW, Hyundai, Kia
03-21-2007, 06:23 AM
#6
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgroen' post='405211' date='Mar 21 2007, 01:46 AM
Another bunch of lawyers getting some fat salaries...
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
03-21-2007, 06:43 AM
#7
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Originally Posted by aqkhan6us' post='405255' date='Mar 21 2007, 03:36 AM
What about PONTIAC copying-BMW, Hyundai, Kia
Sue them all!
Then maybe they can use the money and subsidize us current owners a M5.
03-21-2007, 07:26 AM
#8
Members
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgroen' post='405211' date='Mar 21 2007, 02:46 AM
Another bunch of lawyers getting some fat salaries...
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
Honestly, is this a real problem ?
- I doubt if anyone has a problem distinguishing between a BMW and an Infinity!
Yeah..it is actually a real problem. Brand identity takes years--decades even--to build and Infiniti was clearly using that long-term brand identity to sell their own cars. It is analogous to someone using your credit score to get credit for themselves, or of an author being plagiarized...it does matter. This kind of stuff is actually the basis of a consumer society..bravo to the courts! (BTW--I am NOT an attorney)
03-21-2007, 09:51 AM
#9
Senior Members
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by g8ordoc' post='405206' date='Mar 21 2007, 12:13 AM
"The defendant is also ordered to deliver to the plaintiffs or to destroy under oath, all literature, invoices, packaging, signs, advertisements, promotional or marketing material, printed or otherwise recorded, in the possession, custody or control of the defendant which may be considered to offend the injunction now granted."
03-21-2007, 10:05 AM
#10
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
This thread talls all about who's the trend setter in the car business. 
Cheap copies are not worth buying.
Cheap copies are not worth buying.