alohalc

At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS
President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal
complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:
--------
On March 23, 1994....... the medical examiner viewed the body of
Ronald Opus, and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the
head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building
intending to commit suicide..
----
He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell
past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast
passing through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the
shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been
installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building
workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his
suicide the way he had planned.
-----
"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "Someone who sets out to commit
suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not
be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide." That Mr.
Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have
been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner
to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
-------
The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously,
and he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that
when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the
pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus. When one intends
to kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is
guilty of the murder of subject "B."
-------
When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were
both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not
loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his
wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her.
Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is,
assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded.
----
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old
couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal
accident..
----
It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial
support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the
shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his
father would shoot his mother.
----
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the
murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now
becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald
Opus.
-------
Now comes the exquisite twist... Further investigation revealed that
the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly
despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's
murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd,
only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story
window.
-------
The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical
examiner closed the case as a suicide.





A true story from Associated Press, (Reported by Kurt Westervelt)

Iceman

Unbelievable!

out_kold

is it really? WOW

Merzbow

Nope, not true:

http://www.snopes.com/horrors/freakish/opus.htm

530E60NL

It is used in the movie Magnolia with the actor Tom Cruise..

garehaan

Could have guessed it's not true, good research Merzbow.
Although it's still an amazing story, true or not.

alohalc

thanks for verify that, merzbow .

cobradav

I always truth was stranger than fiction

EBMCS03

Wow crazy...