BMW F10 M5 vs. E60 M5 Compared
#11
Contributors
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F10 Likes
HP
Torque
Front end view
Gas tank size
20" wheels
Every quarter view
7 Speed DCT
F10 Dislikes
Gains 200 lbs
side gills
19" wheels
painted brake calipers
E60 Likes
The thrill of the V10 scream
Still looks really good after all these years (err ... after just 7 years)
Side profile view still trumps F10
The visceral thrill of the V10 scream
E60 Dislikes
Gas tank size
HP
Torque
Front end view
Gas tank size
20" wheels
Every quarter view
7 Speed DCT
F10 Dislikes
Gains 200 lbs
side gills
19" wheels
painted brake calipers
E60 Likes
The thrill of the V10 scream
Still looks really good after all these years (err ... after just 7 years)
Side profile view still trumps F10
The visceral thrill of the V10 scream
E60 Dislikes
Gas tank size
#12
Contributors
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 545i (SMG)
Titanium Gray
Black Interior, Anthracite Trim
M-tech kit
Sport Package
Premium Sound
Satellite Radio
Active Cruise
Comfort Seats
Navigation
Folding rear seats
The side gills are hideous.... They look like they belong on a Kia.
Aside from that, pretty cool.
Aside from that, pretty cool.
#14
Senior Members
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: E60 530d
#17
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Thanks for the this dbae1978,
The M E60 is a great car, but they new M F10 is even greater.
The M E60 is a great car, but they new M F10 is even greater.
#18
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Taken From http://f10.5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=544991:
F10 M5 VS E60 M5
Power: 560hp(@ 6000rpm) VS. 500bhp (@ 7750rpm)
Torque: 501 lb-ft (@ 1500rpm) VS. 384 lb-ft (6100rpm)
0-62mph: 4.4 seconds VS. 4.7 seconds
0-124mph: 13 seconds VS. ____
Top Speed: 155mph (190mph with M Package) VS. 155mph
Transmission: 7 Speed DCT / 6 Speed Manaul VS. 7 speed SMG / 6 Speed Manual
Physical Data
Wheelbase: 116.7 in VS. 113.7 in
Length: 193.3 in VS. 191.5 in
Width: 74.4 in VS. 72.7 in
Height: 57.3 in VS. 57.8 in
Weight: 4,122lb / 4,286lb VS. 4,090 lb (Kerb Weight)
Fuel Consumption: 24 mpg (based on EU cycle) VS. 11 / 17 mpg
Attachment 122509
Attachment 122510
Attachment 122511
Attachment 122512
Attachment 122513
Attachment 122514
Attachment 122515
Attachment 122516
Attachment 122517
Attachment 122518
Attachment 122519
Attachment 122520
Attachment 122521
Attachment 122522
Attachment 122523
Attachment 122524
F10 M5 VS E60 M5
Power: 560hp(@ 6000rpm) VS. 500bhp (@ 7750rpm)
Torque: 501 lb-ft (@ 1500rpm) VS. 384 lb-ft (6100rpm)
0-62mph: 4.4 seconds VS. 4.7 seconds
0-124mph: 13 seconds VS. ____
Top Speed: 155mph (190mph with M Package) VS. 155mph
Transmission: 7 Speed DCT / 6 Speed Manaul VS. 7 speed SMG / 6 Speed Manual
Physical Data
Wheelbase: 116.7 in VS. 113.7 in
Length: 193.3 in VS. 191.5 in
Width: 74.4 in VS. 72.7 in
Height: 57.3 in VS. 57.8 in
Weight: 4,122lb / 4,286lb VS. 4,090 lb (Kerb Weight)
Fuel Consumption: 24 mpg (based on EU cycle) VS. 11 / 17 mpg
Attachment 122509
Attachment 122510
Attachment 122511
Attachment 122512
Attachment 122513
Attachment 122514
Attachment 122515
Attachment 122516
Attachment 122517
Attachment 122518
Attachment 122519
Attachment 122520
Attachment 122521
Attachment 122522
Attachment 122523
Attachment 122524
They honestly should have used a jet black E60 M5. You'd have a much harder time making a choice. Silver right now on the E60 makes them look dated.