View Poll Results: What aspect of CIC compels you to have upgraded or want to upgrade the most?
bluetooth audio streaming?
0
0%
online options(web browsing, news, weather, fb/twitter, google search, web radio, and calender)?
23.08%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll
whats so special about cic???
#1
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: nyc
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm doing some research for my own knowledge/project because I wan't to know from those of you who are considering a cic retrofit or already have done it or had it come with their cars, what specifically sold you the most about it? as some of you know the upgrade might seem a bit pricey to some, but those who have done it sure feel like its well worth it. If i missed anything in the poll let me know post it here. Thanks for you help
#2
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My Ride: 2008 535i:
(8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans
Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps
Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's
1992 Camaro RS:
Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
Seen the CIC on a 3er loaner car awhile back.
NAV graphics weren't much better but calculations were faster due to the system being HDD based.
Display improvements were ok - but definitely not jaw dropping
Didn't care for the "improved" iDrive knob. BMW nailed it with the orginal because of its simplicity or as one member once posted "too many buttons is "- now its a rip off from the Audi MMI.
The online options require a BMW Convenience Plan subscription, which in turn requires an active Safety Plan subscription. So you are looking at a minimum of $200 a year for this feature.
IMO I'd do this upgrade if my CIC ever failed, but I don't see any other reason for the swap.
NAV graphics weren't much better but calculations were faster due to the system being HDD based.
Display improvements were ok - but definitely not jaw dropping
Didn't care for the "improved" iDrive knob. BMW nailed it with the orginal because of its simplicity or as one member once posted "too many buttons is "- now its a rip off from the Audi MMI.
The online options require a BMW Convenience Plan subscription, which in turn requires an active Safety Plan subscription. So you are looking at a minimum of $200 a year for this feature.
IMO I'd do this upgrade if my CIC ever failed, but I don't see any other reason for the swap.
#3
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: nyc
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
New Members
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nyc
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: E60 535i
Model Year: 09
I had a loaner for a week with the Cic nav. I didnt think it was any special, until i got my car back and looked ay my cic nav.... It really looks outdated once u get used to cic.
I would get it if it wasnt so expensive.
I would get it if it wasnt so expensive.
#5
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: nyc
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah at times the ccc can be kinda old looking in comparison to the cic. Especially for load times that hd based system is snappy... I want one so bad but i can't bring myself to justify spending 4-5 g's i don't think the cost vs enjoyment ratio is equal..
#6
Contributors
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
Neither could I justify the cost. At some point you have to be realistic, our cars are depreciating like a stone. That means the car I bought for $30k in 2008 (CPO) is now worth ~$14-15k. It's paid for, yes, but I just can't mentally justify any upgrade costing more than 10% of the value, anything more than that and a newer model WITH CIC becomes more attractive than going through the hassle. My CCC did fail, it cost me $650 for a "new" one (remanufactured, they don't make the CCC anymore). But, hey, that's just me: "If it don't make dollars, it don't make sense" - and no one in their right mind will pay you extra for your car just because it has CIC vs CCC Nav.
#7
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: nyc
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow I'm kinda surprised, at the results so far I thought more people would say good things about it. I know the price is probably the main reason why some are not interested . But if money were no object, I still want to know if you find something most appealing about the cic or if its nothing at all that's cool too.
#8
Contributors
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
My Ride: BMW E60 520d SE Saloon M47 2.0dTitanium Grey II, Grey−Dakota Leather, Visibility Package, Media Package, Through Load System, Lumbar support − fr seats, Automatic Air Conditioning−Advanced, High beam assistant, Hi−Fi Loudspeak
Model Year: 2006
The CIC is a much better system than the CCC but its not without its flaws. I do agree that it doesn't seem to justify the price but even the original Nav when specd doesn't. There are actually quite a few functions that existed in the CCC that BMW didn't include in the CIC, so everything is not a step up.
But for someone like me who was keeping their perfect car and would only upgrade because of the new tech, it made sense.
But for someone like me who was keeping their perfect car and would only upgrade because of the new tech, it made sense.
#9
Contributors
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,098
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
My Ride: BMW
Model Year: 2006
With that in mind, alot of times newer is better, so if you can put a newer technology on your car I'm all over that.
The way I see it, my car became a hobby. And as with all hobbies, one person can see it as a "waste of money" and another can see it as a new toy to have fun with. In the end it's how you see your car. Business or pleasure.
#10
Contributors
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
+100...When I bought my past cars it's always been to keep it until they die. I have never sold a car before and always end up giving them to friends who need them or have teenage kids that got their licenses. My bimmer is the first car I bought pre-owned so it doesn't bother me about upgrade costs. It's still a great car that I will keep and eventually (hopefully) give to my daughter in 3 years when she gets her license.
With that in mind, alot of times newer is better, so if you can put a newer technology on your car I'm all over that.
The way I see it, my car became a hobby. And as with all hobbies, one person can see it as a "waste of money" and another can see it as a new toy to have fun with. In the end it's how you see your car. Business or pleasure.
With that in mind, alot of times newer is better, so if you can put a newer technology on your car I'm all over that.
The way I see it, my car became a hobby. And as with all hobbies, one person can see it as a "waste of money" and another can see it as a new toy to have fun with. In the end it's how you see your car. Business or pleasure.
You have a point. If someone is keeping the car for a very long time it may make more financial sense to do the upgrade - especially if their car didn't have NAV to begin with. I guess I am in a different situation, I have now had 36 cars in my lifetime and I don't see that trend ceasing. I love my car, but getting a newer one (or an F10) with more power and all the updated goodies makes more sense for me. For someone else? That is up to them to make that case.