M-Tech Rear
Unfortunately, I was rear ended tonight. Luckily, both myself and the driver who hit me are uninjured. My car on the other hand will likely need a new rear bumper.
I was wondering if an M-Tech rear bumper would look weird if I do not have M-Tech front and sides? If it matters, my car is pre-LCI. I'm debating whether to stick with the stock bumper or not. I don't like flashiness too much and like the subtle classy look of the stock bumper. Can you guys sway my decision with your opinions and/or pictures in favor of the M-Tech?
Thanks,
I was wondering if an M-Tech rear bumper would look weird if I do not have M-Tech front and sides? If it matters, my car is pre-LCI. I'm debating whether to stick with the stock bumper or not. I don't like flashiness too much and like the subtle classy look of the stock bumper. Can you guys sway my decision with your opinions and/or pictures in favor of the M-Tech?
Thanks,
Hi
Get the mtech bumper if you can. You'll never be able to see the rear bumper and front at the same time so I don't think it matters.
Michael
Acute Performance
Get the mtech bumper if you can. You'll never be able to see the rear bumper and front at the same time so I don't think it matters.
Michael
Acute Performance
Originally Posted by JetCFI' post='1014529' date='Sep 22 2009, 10:44 PM
Unfortunately, I was rear ended tonight. Luckily, both myself and the driver who hit me are uninjured. My car on the other hand will likely need a new rear bumper.
I was wondering if an M-Tech rear bumper would look weird if I do not have M-Tech front and sides? If it matters, my car is pre-LCI. I'm debating whether to stick with the stock bumper or not. I don't like flashiness too much and like the subtle classy look of the stock bumper. Can you guys sway my decision with your opinions and/or pictures in favor of the M-Tech?
Thanks,
I was wondering if an M-Tech rear bumper would look weird if I do not have M-Tech front and sides? If it matters, my car is pre-LCI. I'm debating whether to stick with the stock bumper or not. I don't like flashiness too much and like the subtle classy look of the stock bumper. Can you guys sway my decision with your opinions and/or pictures in favor of the M-Tech?
Thanks,
Contributors
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Northamptonshire UK
My Ride: Week 17 Build, 2008 E60 535d M Sport - Titanium Silver, Black Dakota Leather, Visibility Package, Media Package, Automatic gearbox, Steering Wheel Heating, M Double Spoke 172 19" Mixed Wheels, Auto-Dim+Exterior Mirror, Comfort seats, Front Seat Heating, Aluminium Pentan interior trim,DAB Tuner, TV Function, BMW Individual Audio System 825W !!
Go for it... M-tech rears look great
and if the purse will stand it go for the front too!
Contributors
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,073
Likes: 0
From: new york
My Ride: 2011, E90 M3 Sedan. Alpine White.Competition package, Keyhole cover, fender reflectors in Alpine white, RPI Exhaust, 19
Originally Posted by littlemouse' post='1014640' date='Sep 23 2009, 04:34 AM
Go for it... M-tech rears look great
and if the purse will stand it go for the front too! 

Contributors
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
I have to agree with everyone else - when it's on the insurance's dime - UPGRADE!!! THen when the time and funds are right add the front and/or sides. As was mentioned Tex_Phil has the front and rear but stock sides and his car looks hot.


