E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods Discussion about both stock and aftermarket parts for the E60. Accessories and modifications too!

homemade scoop...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #191  
NobleForums's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dbpack' post='823521' date='Mar 21 2009, 11:14 PM
Right, but that's not what ENGINEERING is. Engineering is the application of known scientific principles, NOT trial and error. Look at it this way: A bridge is engineered. When it was decided to build the George Washington Bridge, they didn't build a bunch of bridges, testing each one until they found one that worked good. They used known scientific principles and many different engineering disciplines to design the bridge, then built it, once. They knew it would work because the design was based on math and the laws of physics. That's the difference between engineering and trial and error. If an engineer with expertise in fluid dynamics was hired to analyze RPi's scoop, I have no doubt the design would be improved, without the need for trial and error.
But like I said, the RPi scoop is a great product, and RPi is a great company dedicated to selling ONLY products that work!

Actually, even at the very high end of bridge building, they do theorize, test, change, retest, change, retest, etc. The difference is they do it on models inside gigantic wind tunnels instead of full sized, because of cost and time restraints. Even when so pressed for time that much of the construction equipment itself is prototypes, models are made, tested, and remade (ie. Millau Viaduct). Sometimes, even the bridges themselves fail and need to be retrofitted (ie. the Millenium Bridge over the Thames River in London) at considerable cost in terms of time & money. Whatever field you're in, you theorize, test, change, retest.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #192  
dbpack's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NobleForums' post='824277' date='Mar 22 2009, 10:06 PM
Actually, even at the very high end of bridge building, they do theorize, test, change, retest, change, retest, etc. The difference is they do it on models inside gigantic wind tunnels instead of full sized, because of cost and time restraints. Even when so pressed for time that much of the construction equipment itself is prototypes, models are made, tested, and remade (ie. Millau Viaduct). Sometimes, even the bridges themselves fail and need to be retrofitted (ie. the Millenium Bridge over the Thames River in London) at considerable cost in terms of time & money. Whatever field you're in, you theorize, test, change, retest.
Right, I guess I oversimplified things... But the models were built based on calculations, not trial and error. They don't just buy some steel and concrete and start building model bridges. A lot of analysis/mathematics goes into the strength of the materials, loads on the joints, keeping costs down, etc. My point is, anyone with enough access to a dyno could have done what RPi did...just keep adjusting until you get what you think are the best results (BTW, kudos to RPi for actually doing it and giving us great results!). There is a HUGE difference between that and actual engineering. Actual engineering requires an in depth knowledge of physics and the ability to mathematically model real-world systems. Like I said before, as soon as I see the maths showing their scoop design was actually "engineered," I'll stop taking issue with the term being thrown around.

Either way, kudos to RPi for making a great product, and kudos to the DIYer's for playing around with things on their own and sharing with the community!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #193  
einstein57's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
My Ride: 05 530i 87 325is 85 VW GTI
Default

Originally Posted by mchamner' post='823499' date='Mar 21 2009, 08:59 PM
Its definitely not botany (the study of plants)...LOL Im messin with ya now
This guy has no idea what a mud pad is for.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #194  
mrfva's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,199
Likes: 0
From: .
My Ride: .
Model Year: .
Default

Glad this is settled
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #195  
mchamner's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by einstein57' post='824769' date='Mar 23 2009, 04:10 PM
This guy has no idea what a mud pad is for.
lol, okay ill bite... wats a mudpan for then?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #196  
DRANGED's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,765
Likes: 0
From: MPLS, USA
My Ride: 10 Honda Fit Sport, 10 Honda Pilot Touring
Default

Originally Posted by mchamner' post='825155' date='Mar 24 2009, 12:33 AM
lol, okay ill bite... wats a mudpan for then?
Drywall.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:50 PM
  #197  
einstein57's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
My Ride: 05 530i 87 325is 85 VW GTI
Default

This may have only been humorous to me since i've been doing a lot of renovation to my house lately (1930's spanish home that has been ignored for 30 years)
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #198  
mchamner's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DRANGED' post='825157' date='Mar 24 2009, 12:41 AM
Drywall.
Oh, Duh... gotchya... I shouldda known this being the son of an architect/contractor and taking classes...lol... well now im in biology...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #199  
Aviator's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Great Falls, MT.
My Ride: It's an E60 545I 6 speed.
Default

Only question I have about the scoops is how do you dyno a product that needs 70 mph of wind for it to work? Did you have a ultra mega hairdryer in front of it?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #200  
or_550i's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon, USA
My Ride: 2006 550i, 1984 Mercedes Gelandewagen
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator' post='825653' date='Mar 24 2009, 03:14 PM
Only question I have about the scoops is how do you dyno a product that needs 70 mph of wind for it to work? Did you have a ultra mega hairdryer in front of it? :P
That's what I've been trying to understand too. Unless there's a dyno set up in wind tunnel - a shop fan (no matter how large) can not compress the air enough to test a ram air intake.

The best method would be to monitor the 'hot-film air mass meter.' It would detect a drop in air pressure (i.e. least resistance from intake to engine). Measuring pin 4 of X6207 would show the difference with or with out a scoop [RPI or Mud-pan].
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.