Turn Signals
#31
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 545i, silver gray, black leather with anthracite maple wood, sport package, premium sound, navigation, cold weather package, electric rear sunshade, folding rear seat, satellite radio prep, PIAA 4150K fogs, red rear reflectors, hardwired Valentine One
Originally Posted by MTRHEAD' date='May 12 2005, 10:58 AM
wow, thanks stream and others, 4 months of ownership and I never realised that trick with cancelling the indicators. That will teach me to RTFM
[snapback]127604[/snapback]
#32
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 17,310
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
My Ride: G30 M550i
Model Year: 2018
I think (and hope) that this will become the new standard. The only reason the old way worked the way it did was due to the mechanical nature of the stalk operation. The old way to turn off the signal was to have a mechanical interface with the steering wheel to return the stalk to center. That was a very complex system of springs, gears, lever, or whatever. Now, the stalk returns to center right away and there's an electronic sensor that cancels the signal from blinking. I like it and am actually annoyed now when I have to reach a larger distance for a stalk to cancel an errant signal. I even like the placement of the stalk. Ten o'clock is much better than nine o'clock in terms of ergonomics.
Sure, it's different. Sure change can be hard to adapt to. I enjoy progress and am happy that BMW had the balls to break the tradition and move forward. It's the same argument as iDrive. Soon all cars will use a similar system because it makes sense -- maybe not at first, but eventually it will become standard...
Sure, it's different. Sure change can be hard to adapt to. I enjoy progress and am happy that BMW had the balls to break the tradition and move forward. It's the same argument as iDrive. Soon all cars will use a similar system because it makes sense -- maybe not at first, but eventually it will become standard...
#33
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles. CA
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i 6 spd Sports Package | NAV | PDC | Logic 7 | BT retrofit | SW V13.3
Originally Posted by urbo73' date='May 12 2005, 01:11 PM
[quote name='Rudy' date='May 11 2005, 11:49 PM']As explained above, the trick to canceling it on the E60 is to move the lever in the SAME direction as the indicator is blinking -- in other words, the opposite of what everyone is used to.
Once you get used to this new way, it actually makes more sense and works fine.
Once you get used to this new way, it actually makes more sense and works fine.
[snapback]127359[/snapback]
Maybe they can switch the gas pedal and brake pedal too. Put the gas pedal in the middle... Then we will be original....
[snapback]127663[/snapback]
[/quote]About 40 years ago, they started getting rid of the third pedal. Good job you weren't driving then.
#34
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 545i, silver gray, black leather with anthracite maple wood, sport package, premium sound, navigation, cold weather package, electric rear sunshade, folding rear seat, satellite radio prep, PIAA 4150K fogs, red rear reflectors, hardwired Valentine One
Originally Posted by Rudy' date='May 12 2005, 03:51 PM
I think (and hope) that this will become the new standard.? The only reason the old way worked the way it did was due to the mechanical nature of the stalk operation.? The old way to turn off the signal was to have a mechanical interface with the steering wheel to return the stalk to center.? That was a very complex system of springs, gears, lever, or whatever.? Now, the stalk returns to center right away and there's an electronic sensor that cancels the signal from blinking.? I like it and am actually annoyed now when I have to reach a larger distance for a stalk to cancel an errant signal.? I even like the placement of the stalk.? Ten o'clock is much better than nine o'clock in terms of ergonomics.
Sure, it's different.? Sure change can be hard to adapt to.? I enjoy progress and am happy that BMW had the balls to break the tradition and move forward.? It's the same argument as iDrive.? Soon all cars will use a similar system because it makes sense -- maybe not at first, but eventually it will become standard...
Sure, it's different.? Sure change can be hard to adapt to.? I enjoy progress and am happy that BMW had the balls to break the tradition and move forward.? It's the same argument as iDrive.? Soon all cars will use a similar system because it makes sense -- maybe not at first, but eventually it will become standard...
[snapback]127774[/snapback]
#35
Contributors
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Proud citizen of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MORGANTOWN, W.V.
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 530i, Premium, Steptronic, Logic7, Silver grey-black leather. Build date 12/7/04.
It's just another example of BMW creating a solution to a problem that didn't exist.
#37
Members
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 535d Auto M Sport delivered 04/10/05, Carbon Black, Beige Ventilated Nasca Leather, Dark Poplar Wood, Media Pack - Sat Nav Pro, Bmw Assist, Bluetooth phone prep + telematics + snap in adapter for Nokia 6230i & 6 CD, Visibility Pack - bi-xenons, adaptive headlights and Headlight Wash, HUD, High Gloss Shadow Line, Extended Lights, HiFi System, Extended Voice, M Spoiler and Heated/ventilated f/seats. Chrome Grills. M Double Spoke 19" Mixed Wheels 172 with 245/35 front and 275/30 rear (Non-runflat continentals) Spare wheel and jack. Supaglass.
Nope - even I can't buy that. I'm coming to BMW soon from Porsche and LOVE the gadgets that BMW provide (found the MMI in Audi a bit too primitive on a recent test drive) but even I struggle with justification for the indicators....
#38
Contributors
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by orient5' date='May 11 2005, 08:29 PM
you can go to idrive and switch off this 3-click function. the indicator will then operate just like a normal car's.
[snapback]127317[/snapback]
#39
Contributors
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by phototalk123' date='May 11 2005, 10:23 PM
hum. if a iDrive contain the code that controls the blinker, maybe we should send a reqeust to BMW say, let's let the user to have "variable" function for the blinker.
User can decide how many clicks they want. Since it is control by iDrive, it should be easy to modify via firmware.
User can decide how many clicks they want. Since it is control by iDrive, it should be easy to modify via firmware.
[snapback]127348[/snapback]
#40
Contributors
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Magneto' date='May 12 2005, 09:58 AM
You know, if we're going to bother modifying I-Drive to allow selecting the 'number of blinks', maybe we should go a little further.? I'm thinking that on US cars a "Florida Retiree" option might be useful.? If selected the right turn blinker would be permanently on.?
[snapback]127533[/snapback]
My wife's Lincoln has a neat feature. After a few blinks, the blinker starts clicking louder and louder. Eventually it will drown out Credence or whatever going in the CD.