Are Run Flat Tires the future?
#1
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2009 550i sports, Nav, logic Best E60 yet
2004 545i, sports pkg, logic 7 steptronic, rear shade,orient blue with beige interior, blue tooth enabled Razer Phone. 2004 X5 3.0, sports pkg, stepronic, summer pkg. imola red.
2006 Mini Cooper S, manual, sports, prem pkg, nav and kitchen sink.
BMW obviousely feels RF's are the future, whether this thinking is motivated by saving money or weight or just building a safer car I'll never know, but the industry seems to jumping on the band wagon.
I believe that tire price will drop once demand has risen and all major manufactures are producng RF tires, the advantages are a plus, after all who wants to get stuck. I believe Michelin and Pirrelli are both offering RF and their customers demand quality high preformance tires, which I also want, tires that will last at least 20,000 miles and give me a compfortable ride and handle well in both wet and dry .
My 545 had issues, the dunlop RF were horrible, when brand new the car drove and felt fine, but after only a few thousand miles the ride would deteriate and I began to hate the car, especially after having to change tires 4 times in 18 months and 25,000 miles. Maybe the car was off or maybe it was the dunlops but I hated the car. My 07 550 has been great so far even though I have only driven 6000 miles it appears that I won't have the same issues as before.
So what's it going to be Run Flats or no Run Flats that is the question??????????????????
I believe that tire price will drop once demand has risen and all major manufactures are producng RF tires, the advantages are a plus, after all who wants to get stuck. I believe Michelin and Pirrelli are both offering RF and their customers demand quality high preformance tires, which I also want, tires that will last at least 20,000 miles and give me a compfortable ride and handle well in both wet and dry .
My 545 had issues, the dunlop RF were horrible, when brand new the car drove and felt fine, but after only a few thousand miles the ride would deteriate and I began to hate the car, especially after having to change tires 4 times in 18 months and 25,000 miles. Maybe the car was off or maybe it was the dunlops but I hated the car. My 07 550 has been great so far even though I have only driven 6000 miles it appears that I won't have the same issues as before.
So what's it going to be Run Flats or no Run Flats that is the question??????????????????
#2
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Originally Posted by jochet' post='345245' date='Oct 15 2006, 07:46 PM
BMW obviousely feels RF's are the future, whether this thinking is motivated by saving money or weight or just building a safer car I'll never know, but the industry seems to jumping on the band wagon.
I see only 1 benefit for RFTs... safety and thats it. Costs more to replace... harsher ride... adds rolling weight to the wheels... worsen MPGs...
#3
Contributors
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gurnee, Illinois
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EBMCS03' post='345250' date='Oct 15 2006, 10:04 PM
How would runflats save money? or weight? I'm gussing BMW chose them because of the safety it adds to buyers.
I see only 1 benefit for RFTs... safety and thats it. Costs more to replace... harsher ride... adds rolling weight to the wheels... worsen MPGs...
I see only 1 benefit for RFTs... safety and thats it. Costs more to replace... harsher ride... adds rolling weight to the wheels... worsen MPGs...
My wifes non run flat 03 325xi has a full size tire and premium rim combo in the trunk that perfectly matches whats on the axles.
Thats a lot of extra weight and costs them alot too.
#4
Contributors
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 21,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: Mini Cooper
You should be just like me and have no spare at the back to save wight and cost.
Just call Tow Matter out to tow and fix it cheeper that way. only $44us each time but for a spare in HK cost is
$380us too much for a spare
Just call Tow Matter out to tow and fix it cheeper that way. only $44us each time but for a spare in HK cost is
$380us too much for a spare
#5
Senior Members
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Livermore, California
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 550i
Build date 11/2005
options include:
cold weather package/ convenience package/premium sound package/ sport package/sunshades/Navigation/ V3 cradle/ OE 166 wheels/M-tech upgrade/M rear spoiler/ racemesh m-tech grill/racemesh kidney grills/M5 mirrors/M5 steering wheel/ HID fog light conversion/ M5 SMG paddles
non runflats- better ride; lower cost; better performance...afterall, BMW did put that SOS button in there for a reason. Besides, not to start a new topic or anything but how many people have experienced a blowout? Ive been driving for 19 years and have not had one!
#6
Contributors
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 21,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: Mini Cooper
Originally Posted by Matt BMW California' post='345372' date='Oct 16 2006, 10:46 PM
non runflats- better ride; lower cost; better performance...afterall, BMW did put that SOS button in there for a reason. Besides, not to start a new topic or anything but how many people have experienced a blowout? Ive been driving for 19 years and have not had one!
#7
Senior Members
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2001 BMW330ci, Steel Gray, Black leather, Steptronic, PP, SP, PDC, Heated seats, Xenon head lights, HK, 6 disk changer, OEM alarm, OEM clears,Iice white fog lights ,Universal trasnciver, 17 inch Michelin Pilot Sport Tires
2005 530i Titanium Gray,Black leather, Nav.,HUD,PP,CWP,SP,PDC,Xenon lights,Steptronic,Logic 7 sound system,,Fold down read seats,Power shades
ON ORDER
Originally Posted by Matt BMW California' post='345372' date='Oct 16 2006, 10:46 AM
non runflats- better ride; lower cost; better performance...afterall, BMW did put that SOS button in there for a reason. Besides, not to start a new topic or anything but how many people have experienced a blowout? Ive been driving for 19 years and have not had one!
cheers
vern
#8
Contributors
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chippenham, Wiltshire UK
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: F11 535i M-Sport,, Silver, Black Leather, LED Adaptive headlights
Model Year: 2015
Engine: N55
The safety aspect of RFT's is that catastrophic loss of pressure is much less likely. Also a slow puncture or other loss of air will have much less effect on the handling of the car.
IMHO yes they may well be the future, but they are not there yet.
First they need.
1. Better ride comfort, handling and stabilty.
2. Much longer life when deflated, 20-50 miles is clearly insufficient and likely to leave you stranded.
3. Better absorbtion of road impacts, rather than transmitting it all to the rims with consequent damage.
It might yet prove beyond current technology to meet all these demands, remember, we have been hear before.
Who else remembers Dunlops 'Denovo' run flat system back in the 1970/80's.
That was touted as the future for all car tyres, but it died a death.
Manufacturers acn fit RFT's as OEM all they like, but if they are unpopular with customers, the replacement market will sound thier death knell.
IMHO yes they may well be the future, but they are not there yet.
First they need.
1. Better ride comfort, handling and stabilty.
2. Much longer life when deflated, 20-50 miles is clearly insufficient and likely to leave you stranded.
3. Better absorbtion of road impacts, rather than transmitting it all to the rims with consequent damage.
It might yet prove beyond current technology to meet all these demands, remember, we have been hear before.
Who else remembers Dunlops 'Denovo' run flat system back in the 1970/80's.
That was touted as the future for all car tyres, but it died a death.
Manufacturers acn fit RFT's as OEM all they like, but if they are unpopular with customers, the replacement market will sound thier death knell.
#9
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Originally Posted by Veight' post='345368' date='Oct 16 2006, 07:26 AM
They save money and weight because BMW doesnt have to supply a full size spare with a 5th rim.
My wifes non run flat 03 325xi has a full size tire and premium rim combo in the trunk that perfectly matches whats on the axles.
Thats a lot of extra weight and costs them alot too.
My wifes non run flat 03 325xi has a full size tire and premium rim combo in the trunk that perfectly matches whats on the axles.
Thats a lot of extra weight and costs them alot too.
#10
Contributors
My plan is changing to Yokohama for better road noise when current tires wear out. I don't like runflat. It's too noisy and harsh.
Also, Yokohama is about 8 lbs lighter compared to B.Potenza RFT.
By changing 4 tires, we shave off 32 lbs right there. This is one of Znod's favorite mod to reduce weight
Also, Yokohama is about 8 lbs lighter compared to B.Potenza RFT.
By changing 4 tires, we shave off 32 lbs right there. This is one of Znod's favorite mod to reduce weight