E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Ride Quality of LCI 18 RFT vs 19 non-RFT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2007 | 06:07 AM
  #41  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Felix' post='407341' date='Mar 27 2007, 02:22 AM
Interestingly RFTs are not mentioned once in this article but "High performance tires" and "wider tires or a "Plus Size" tire and wheel package" seem to help you do some tramlining.

All change to donuts.

ABC
Old 03-27-2007 | 07:36 AM
  #42  
550isport's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 392
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut, USA
My Ride: 07' 550i sport; Sapphire Black/Auburn; sport package; steptronic; navigation with R.T.T.I.; heads up; cold weather package; Logic-7; BMW MOST ipod kit; Motorola V3 snap-in adapter; rear heated seats and rear shades; anthracite headliner; sirrius sat. radio; M-aero kit; OEM style 166 Wheels with 245/35-19 front and 285/30-19 rear Michelin PS2s.
Default

I have an 07' 550i on which I put 19 inch wheels and non-run flat tires. As far as ride quality there is an obvious difference. The runflats are much harsher and stiffer riding, particularly over small imperfections in the road (small potholes and crumbling pavement) and small sharp bumps (expansion joints and the lip on driveway ramps etc..). Obviously there is a safety benefit to runflats that cannot be ignored. My priority is on handling. And the softer rubber of a non-funflat tire along with the flex in the sidewall allows for a significantly greater amount of grip while actually providing a better ride. This combination for me was compelling (and turned out to be 100% true BTW). One HUGE factor for me that I only discovered after riding on the non run flats was that they are much better in wet conditions. Apparently the stiff sidewall and harder rubber of the run flats makes them more like hockeypucks in the rain. Think of this: why would BMW change its very stubborn mind about runflats on the LCI 550i sport? Simple: They offer the highest performance and so they should go on the highest performing non-M 5 series (you'll notice there was never a thought of the current M5 ever having runflats). The 535i I'm sure will be a sensational car, but it is not, and never will be, BMW's flagship 5, and so the runflats remain OEM. {I don't mean to flame the 535 at all. I'm sure dynamically it has some advantages over the 550, but the more expensive car with more cylinders and displacement holds the title of flagship, period - i.e. Audi's A8 W12 is dynamically inferior to the S8, but the 12 is the flagship}.
Old 03-27-2007 | 07:52 AM
  #43  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by 550isport' post='407569' date='Mar 27 2007, 04:36 PM
...19 inch wheels and non-run flat tires. As far as ride quality there is an obvious difference
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/tec...e.jsp?techid=47

ABC
Old 03-27-2007 | 11:49 AM
  #44  
TC.'s Avatar
TC.
Members
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Oxfordshire UK
My Ride: 535d m sport - 9 Weeks to go!!
Default

Originally Posted by mick550' post='407217' date='Mar 26 2007, 08:50 PM
The dramatic difference you describe between these surprises me. I would have guessed that 18" RFT would be comparable to 19" non-RFT setup with regard to ride quality. I did not expect that someone would feel that 19" non-RFT gives a better ride than 17' RFT.

Mick
I have been very neutral about the entire RFT debate until I had the opportunity to drive RFT in the moring and Non RFT in the afternoon - granted that there are significant chasis differences between a 17" wheel clad 3 series SE and 19" clad 5 series M Sport however the subtlety of feeling the road through the chasis and suspension of the m sport 5 versus the head-but i got from an RFT SE was no illusion!

I am convinced that RFT's are a perfect compromise between safety, ride and performance in a country where they invest in roads - not in a country like the UK where the majority of roads are knitted together with badly filled in water / gas / electrical main trenches........
Old 03-27-2007 | 12:03 PM
  #45  
Ricracing's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
From: Helsinki, Finland
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Default

Originally Posted by 550isport' post='407569' date='Mar 27 2007, 06:36 PM
I have an 07' 550i on which I put 19 inch wheels and non-run flat tires. As far as ride quality there is an obvious difference. The runflats are much harsher and stiffer riding, particularly over small imperfections in the road (small potholes and crumbling pavement) and small sharp bumps (expansion joints and the lip on driveway ramps etc..). Obviously there is a safety benefit to runflats that cannot be ignored. My priority is on handling.
Sorry for chopping and underlining your writing 550isport, but that's it.

Mine is on comfort and handling!

Since you are also from the "North" and do know what these winters does to the roads,
I have nothing more to add,
except 18"'s the max.


PS. The LCI 550i still comes with 17" wheels as standard from Dingolfing

PS2. The M models do not use RF tyres.
Old 03-27-2007 | 12:12 PM
  #46  
andy545's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
From: expat in The Netherlands
My Ride: BMW 545iA Black Sapphire
Model Year: 2005
Engine: 545i
Default

Originally Posted by TC.' post='407658' date='Mar 27 2007, 09:49 PM
I have been very neutral about the entire RFT debate until I had the opportunity to drive RFT in the moring and Non RFT in the afternoon - granted that there are significant chasis differences between a 17" wheel clad 3 series SE and 19" clad 5 series M Sport however the subtlety of feeling the road through the chasis and suspension of the m sport 5 versus the head-but i got from an RFT SE was no illusion!

I am convinced that RFT's are a perfect compromise between safety, ride and performance in a country where they invest in roads - not in a country like the UK where the majority of roads are knitted together with badly filled in water / gas / electrical main trenches........
True. I never really had harsh criticism for my 18" RFT setup - going to 19" non RFT has brought about little difference in ride comfort (at least on Dutch roads) but a NOTICEABLE improvement in handling. Rear 275 and spacers probably account significantly to this. I'm happy with both the ride comfort and handling with my new setup !
Old 03-28-2007 | 07:33 AM
  #47  
Hormazd's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles. CA
My Ride: 2004 545i 6 spd Sports Package | NAV | PDC | Logic 7 | BT retrofit | SW V13.3
Default

Originally Posted by TC.' post='407658' date='Mar 27 2007, 11:49 AM
I have been very neutral about the entire RFT debate until I had the opportunity to drive RFT in the moring and Non RFT in the afternoon - granted that there are significant chasis differences between a 17" wheel clad 3 series SE and 19" clad 5 series M Sport however the subtlety of feeling the road through the chasis and suspension of the m sport 5 versus the head-but i got from an RFT SE was no illusion!

I am convinced that RFT's are a perfect compromise between safety, ride and performance in a country where they invest in roads - not in a country like the UK where the majority of roads are knitted together with badly filled in water / gas / electrical main trenches........
HA, drive in Los Angeles with RFs and you will yearn for your roads.
Old 03-28-2007 | 07:55 AM
  #48  
aybeesea's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Hormazd' post='407990' date='Mar 28 2007, 04:33 PM
HA, drive in Los Angeles with RFs and you will yearn for your roads.
You choose your wheel size and you take the ride.

ABC
Old 03-28-2007 | 08:40 PM
  #49  
Hormazd's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles. CA
My Ride: 2004 545i 6 spd Sports Package | NAV | PDC | Logic 7 | BT retrofit | SW V13.3
Default

Originally Posted by aybeesea' post='408003' date='Mar 28 2007, 08:55 AM
You choose your wheel size and you take the ride.

ABC
Huh?

What I read on this thread is that even with the extra inch and therefore lower profile/aspect ratio of the 19", the ride will be much better than what I have now.
Old 03-28-2007 | 11:27 PM
  #50  
bmw4life's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
My Ride: Look At My Signature. -Other Rides and Previous Rides: 04 BMW X3 | 03 BMW 330i (Sold) | 05 BMW M3 (Gone)- 05 Infiniti G35 sedan, Premium Package, Bose Sound, HID, Sports Package, Hardwired Escort Passport x50 Blue Installed, New Transmission Installed, Navigation, Keyless Entry+Start Other Current Ride.
Default

Run Flats are great in my opinion. Its a hassle getting nails fixed... because the tire company takes roughly 20 minutes plus taking it off, but yeah... its great. The ride of the 18's are a bit rougher than the regular rims i have had, but traction with the 18 550i sports rims have given me better grip and handling. Awesome bridgestone tires. For me, I got used to the ride. But then again i dont have the sport suspension, so it might compensate for it.


Quick Reply: Ride Quality of LCI 18 RFT vs 19 non-RFT



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.