Is premium gas really necessary?
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Australia
My Ride: 2008 E90 335i Titanium Silver
GONE - 2005 530i Titanium Grey
I know this is slightly off topic, but am curious to know what others think...
Shell Australia has just introduced a new premium petrol called Shell Extreme - they advertise it as 100 octane fuel but add the point that it's 5% ethanol - www.shell.com.au/extreme
I've always filled up with 98 octane fuel and when I heard about the 100 octane I was curious. However, now that I now it has the 5% ethanol, I'm hesitant to use it.
Anyone got any thoughts or experiences with this? Apologies for being slightly off topic.
Shell Australia has just introduced a new premium petrol called Shell Extreme - they advertise it as 100 octane fuel but add the point that it's 5% ethanol - www.shell.com.au/extreme
I've always filled up with 98 octane fuel and when I heard about the 100 octane I was curious. However, now that I now it has the 5% ethanol, I'm hesitant to use it.
Anyone got any thoughts or experiences with this? Apologies for being slightly off topic.
Members
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
My Ride: 2006 JET BLACK on BLACK SPORTS PACK 5ER, with RADENERGIE R-10's @ 20"
IMO I think your car will not only perform better but the engine will probably last longer when you burn cleaner gas. The way I look at it I'm sure the gasoline companies mix other crap in the gas to get more profit per gallon. So why take a chance with your expensive toy. Just feed the best gas you can get and enjoy it.
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by hmc' post='218503' date='Jan 2 2006, 10:56 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2003-0...remiumgas_x.htm
In this article, some experts say no.
I am bothered by the fact that Honda 3.0L V6 (in Accord) is rated 245HP with regular gas (87) and my car (3.0L I6) is only rated 215HP with premium gas (91).
I seriously suspect that, like the article says, BMW calls for premium (in case of my model) to distinguish upmarket models.
In this article, some experts say no.
I am bothered by the fact that Honda 3.0L V6 (in Accord) is rated 245HP with regular gas (87) and my car (3.0L I6) is only rated 215HP with premium gas (91).
I seriously suspect that, like the article says, BMW calls for premium (in case of my model) to distinguish upmarket models.
Engines designed for regular fuel don't improve on premium and sometimes run worse.
Engines designed for premium run fine on regular, too, their makers say, though power declines slightly.
Now I wonder why would you like to save $2.00 a tank after you spend almost 50K for your car? Give your car the best fuel and enjoy the ride
Engines designed for premium run fine on regular, too, their makers say, though power declines slightly.
Now I wonder why would you like to save $2.00 a tank after you spend almost 50K for your car? Give your car the best fuel and enjoy the ride
This has been covered here http://forums.e60.net/index.php?showtopic=20162
Originally Posted by hmc' post='218503' date='Jan 2 2006, 09:56 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2003-0...remiumgas_x.htm
In this article, some experts say no.
I am bothered by the fact that Honda 3.0L V6 (in Accord) is rated 245HP with regular gas (87) and my car (3.0L I6) is only rated 215HP with premium gas (91).
I seriously suspect that, like the article says, BMW calls for premium (in case of my model) to distinguish upmarket models.
In this article, some experts say no.
I am bothered by the fact that Honda 3.0L V6 (in Accord) is rated 245HP with regular gas (87) and my car (3.0L I6) is only rated 215HP with premium gas (91).
I seriously suspect that, like the article says, BMW calls for premium (in case of my model) to distinguish upmarket models.
http://toptiergas.com/
In the long run, using gasoline other what is recommended may
deterioriate engine performance. For those that lease, it may not be their problem. For those that buy these cars, they may have a problem.
Another reason to stick with new cars, perhaps.
Senior Members
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
My Ride: 2001 BMW330ci, Steel Gray, Black leather, Steptronic, PP, SP, PDC, Heated seats, Xenon head lights, HK, 6 disk changer, OEM alarm, OEM clears,Iice white fog lights ,Universal trasnciver, 17 inch Michelin Pilot Sport Tires
2005 530i Titanium Gray,Black leather, Nav.,HUD,PP,CWP,SP,PDC,Xenon lights,Steptronic,Logic 7 sound system,,Fold down read seats,Power shades
ON ORDER
This topic has been brought up many times over the years on just about all of the BMW sites and it all comes down to what ever you are content in doing.Do what the manual tells you about using minimum octane rating 91,(page 169),or use a lower octane and take your chances its your choice to make.IMO after paying $50,000+ for a car its just not worth it to me to save $100.00+ a year on the lower octane. You spend more than that on a night on the town.Good luck
cheers
vern
cheers
vern
Senior Members
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
My Ride: Nothing to boast about!
I have used different grades of fuel here (RON95 and 98; think it's 89 and 91 in the US). The car ran fine but in our stop and go driving conditions here, I have noticed the cost/distance ended up about the same. Well, maybe the higher grade is S$0.01 (==US$0.01/1.7) more expensive for every km. And, there is a slight loss of power with the lower grade.
But I never did proper tracking; just some mental calculations as I went along. But I don't think I am too far off... I can probably go to a very nice restaurant once every year with the saving. Instead, I feed them to the car.
But I never did proper tracking; just some mental calculations as I went along. But I don't think I am too far off... I can probably go to a very nice restaurant once every year with the saving. Instead, I feed them to the car.
Contributors
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
My Ride: 2005 525i Titanium Silver Metalic and 2003 325xi Jet Black with the Premium Package in both cars.
I've used in my 525i, 89, 91 and 93 with never any problems, As the norm, I stick to 91 but occassionally go with 93. I guess its a user's preference.
Contributors
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
From: Helsinki, Finland
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
For example the 530i is said to have 255 hp in the US where the ocatane is not higher than 93,
in Europe the same engine specs gives 258 hp with 98 octane gas.
Higher octane = more hp and better milage.
The BMW engines are made to use higher octane but they work great with lower as well.
in Europe the same engine specs gives 258 hp with 98 octane gas.
Higher octane = more hp and better milage.
The BMW engines are made to use higher octane but they work great with lower as well.
Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='219110' date='Jan 4 2006, 12:17 PM
For example the 530i is said to have 255 hp in the US where the ocatane is not higher than 93,
in Europe the same engine specs gives 258 hp with 98 octane gas.
Higher octane = more hp and better milage.
in Europe the same engine specs gives 258 hp with 98 octane gas.
Higher octane = more hp and better milage.
Like to other posts...
http://forums.e60.net/index.php?showtopic=20162&st=0
I think your message is right in that lower octane will give you a little less power but for different reasons. And putting in higher octane than what the car was designed for will NOT give you any more power.


