more displacement--why
08-26-2010, 05:44 PM
#51
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My Ride: 2008 535i:
(8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans
Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps
Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's
1992 Camaro RS:
Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
I had an '03 T-Blazer and yes - the 4.0 I6 was an awesome motor. You'd have to look at the tach to make sure the engine was running at warm idle - that's how quiet and smooth it was.
08-27-2010, 04:19 PM
#53
Exactly they do not have to make the engine signifigantly longer or that much bigger-a 3.5 litre I6 NA engine with 330 horsepower and 280 foot pounds would be a sweet motor--totally compete with other segments but still maintain unique, smooth performance in a lightweight package--
Just dont get it-the S54 was such a hit and that was over a decade ago-they could have built on that and made a lower revving more user friendly 3.5ish version with a 7k redline --would be amazing
Just dont get it-the S54 was such a hit and that was over a decade ago-they could have built on that and made a lower revving more user friendly 3.5ish version with a 7k redline --would be amazing