E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Long-term effects of using < 91 octane fuel

Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:08 AM
  #1  
kajin99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Members
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA , USA
My Ride: Coming soon...
Default

Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:

I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency.

I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that).

Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:57 AM
  #2  
PraiseTheLowered's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,501
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.

Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:00 AM
  #3  
theXman's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,053
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
My Ride: 2004 530i
Model Year: 2004
Default

Originally Posted by PraiseTheLowered
is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.

Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas.

Well said.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:05 AM
  #4  
pukka's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
My Ride: 2008 535i: (8/07 Build) Metallic Bronze, Beige NASCA Leather, Ventilated Seats, Sport Pkg, Cold Wxr Pkg, Logic-7 Sound, HUD, Night Vision, PDC, Split Rear Seats, NAV, Premium Pkg, Comfort Access, HD Radio, Sport Auto Trans Current mods: M-Aero Kit, JB4, Motorcepts 6000k HID Foglamps Umnitza ICE-Lite 10w LED 6000k AE's 1992 Camaro RS: Fully Restored w/Custom Interior, 5.0L V8, T-tops, OEM Z28 Foglamps, Inst Cluster, & Spoiler, Custom Sound, Too many engine mods to list
Default

Originally Posted by kajin99
Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:

I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency.

I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that).

Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency?
1-No
2-No other drawbacks that aren't subjective
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:23 AM
  #5  
SSRL_2006's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Australia
My Ride: BMW E60 530i
Default

I currently use 98 and the drive is much smoother. And, if you use 98 compared to a 91, then you get more distance (proven using BP Ultimate). So, at the end of the day, the price is about the same if you think about it... pay $0.10 more and get more distance than the 91 + smoother drive etc.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:42 AM
  #6  
rafichicago's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 3
From: Roselle IL
My Ride: 2008 BMW 550i M Sport
Default

I live in IL. price difference between 87 and 93 octane fuel is .30c per gallon. I am getting about 330 miles per fuel tank on average. That gives about 45 fill ups a Year with average 15K miles per year. Usually it will be about 16 gallons of fuel per fill up. 16 gallons times 0.3c is $4.80 let's say $5 even. At 45 fill ups it comes to $225 a year, and that is with driving 15K miles per year! Don't we have a bigger problems to worry about? Just use the right fuel. It won't hurt.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
-Mike-'s Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
My Ride: 2008 550i sport
Default

i'm gonna pump some e85 in the 5er and see how that affects performance

i hear your mileage is reduced

i'll report back

this could save you 30 cents a gallon
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #8  
porshah's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Rockaway, NJ
Default

Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 07:51 AM
  #9  
pjinca's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,496
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
My Ride: 2008 550I LOADED, all options except HUD and NV
Default

Let's see, long term effects of using lower grade gas? How about not having engine repairs covered even if you are under warranty. The owners manual does not say "91 or Premium octeane recommended" it says "required", which to me means using lower octane fuel can give the dealer a reason not to cover a repair even if the warranty is still active. Other than that? You're good I use the highest octane available, which for me (SoCal) is 91.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 08:12 AM
  #10  
bha7176's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA area
My Ride: SOLD...Jet Black 2008 550i M Sport with SAT, black interior. RPI exhaust and air scoop, 35% huper optik tint all around, CF roundels, flat black kidneys, Springfield Armory XD-40 jet black in glove box, charcoal filter removed.
Default

Originally Posted by porshah
Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!
and that kind of logic, my friend, is why the price of fuel in general, and taxes, are going to keep creeping up and up, cent by cent, for no other reason than they can and guys like you say whats the difference, it's only $3 per tank. Or so what, my taxes are only going to increase by $100 a year - no big deal.



Sorry, one of my pet peeves. I digress.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM.