E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

E60 Diesel in North America?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2005, 04:47 AM
  #21  
Contributors
 
niktee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Proud citizen of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MORGANTOWN, W.V.
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: '05 530i, Premium, Steptronic, Logic7, Silver grey-black leather. Build date 12/7/04.
Default

I beleive it's just a matter of time, and sooner rather than later, until the U.S. market gets BMW diesels.
Old 03-04-2005, 04:50 AM
  #22  
Members
 
New535's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535d Sport (M sport steering, M sport sills, M sport suspension, 18inch M style wheels) Carbon black, black nasca, dark wood, dechromed, folding mirrors, extended lights, sun protect glazing, grad tinted winscreen, servotronic steering, heated, ventilated active comfort seats, extended voice control, hi-fi speakers, hud, active cruise, split folding rear seats, rear electric blind, rear manual blinds visbility pack (xenons, adaptive headlights), media pack (6 CD, prof nav, bluetooth with telematics and assist)
Default

Originally Posted by Doug' date='Mar 4 2005, 08:11 AM
[quote name='drjochen' date='Mar 3 2005, 05:37 PM'][quote name='Merv the Derv' date='Mar 3 2005, 06:15 PM']Has anyone enquired at their dealership as to when, if ever, you will be able to order the diesel models? Don't get me wrong the petrol models are fantastic and if you get cheap gas they must be an absolute joy to own. But the modern BMW diesels are a different driving experience altogether. Not better just different! Its a shame you can't try both before you order.?

Are there any performace diesels available in North America?
[snapback]96776[/snapback]
Mercedes and VW sell Diesels here....
[snapback]96780[/snapback]
[/quote]

Hello,

The US Governent cares about pollutants that cause local SMOG, and Regional ACID RAIN, and does not place a heavy emphasis on CO2. Diesels are nasty, even the new ones. I drive them in Europe and they drive great and get great fuel mileage. However, our air is cleaner here in the USA and we like it that way.

Cars cause at most 2% total of the world's Co2 output. Most CO2 comes from Coal power plants and other sources. Your Euro governments have you all conned that CO2 from cars is directly causing Global warming and that that by taxing you they will save the world. What they are doing is taking money from the middle class and giving it to the people who choose not to be productive.

It is easy to bash the USA and Bush. Please note that China and India are exempt from Kyoto. Why not tax OPEC for the amount of oil they sell? Why not tax coal mines? Why is this just American drivers' fault when only 2% of all Co2 comes from cars, and 1/10 of that is from the USA?

BTW, the Euro's favorite USA President Bill Clinton did not make any effort ratify the Kyoto Treaty. Nobody talks about this. It just became President Bush's fault when he inherited the problem left behind by Clinton.

Younger people in the UK are anti US and becoming more and more socialistic. They all want to live in an Abba video world and take 6 weeks vacation per year in France, work 35-40 hours a week, wear a slick suit and retire at 60 with a pention. Did you ever notice that the French never come to the UK to spend money and do not buy British goods? Some friend the French are to you. Keep this path up and watch as eastern Europe, India and China takes everything from Europe in the next 40 years. Good luck.

Sorry bouoght the rant. I just spent a few days in the UK forced to watch BBC news non stop.

-Doug
[snapback]97067[/snapback]
[/quote]


wooooah! you needed to get that off your chest! I kind of tend to agree with you that we get force fed a load of horse sh*t by our governments - who are not really interested in protecting the environment at all - however I don't think we are unique in that.

I thought the biggest concerns with diesel fumes were the soot, the nitrogen oxide and nitrogen dioxide (and of course PM10) all of which are significantly less than they ever were with diesel cars before the modern emissions standards (such as EU4). To the point now where it can easily be argued that modern diesel engines are genuinely better for the environment than similar standard modern petrol cars (less carbon monoxide, less hydrocarbon emissions); and even more so over their lifetime.

Aside from the simple fact that you can get more miles to the gallon from diesel fuel, it can also be significantly cheaper (and simpler) to produce, and there are also more sources that you can get diesel fuel from (recycled chip fat no less!). So it isn't just about the outputs from burning diesel.

Having said all of that, the main reason I am buying a 535d is that I can get great performance and not have to stop so often on long trips to fill up the tank. I've never had a diesel car before, so this will be an experience - If I lived in the US, honestly, I don't think I would care that much if the diesel wasn't available, but I would probably think about it a bit...
Old 03-04-2005, 04:59 AM
  #23  
Senior Members
 
wiszmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SWFL, FL - USA
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: '06 530i -6speed - Comfort Seats - Premium Package - Premium Sound Package - Cold Weather Package - Ventilated Seats - Xenon -HUD - PDC - Nav
Default

i'd have bought the 530d/535d is available here.

vw carries the 1.9l TDI PD engine w/ 100hp ... hopefully soon the 2.5l TDI PD engine, or at least the higher output 1.9l TDI.

diesels are great cars, for more than just gas milage. mainenance is also lower, no need to change your oil every 4K miles .. not that its required w/ the e60 .. but most other cars out there are still on a 4K service schedule.
Old 03-04-2005, 05:02 AM
  #24  
Contributors
 
skaffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: -04 530D
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman' date='Mar 4 2005, 04:38 PM
[quote name='skaffa' date='Mar 4 2005, 01:31 PM']If take motor without any external (catalyst, soot trap etc.) emission controll method, petrol is better.

Petrol:
-"no" particles
-low NOx (due lower burning temp)
-low SOx (depend of fuel, but generally better than diesel)
-high CO/CO2

Diesel:
-"high" particles
-"high" NOx (due high burning temp)
-"high" SOx (depend of fuel, but generally more than petrol)
-low CO/CO2

Today diesel is more clean than petrol IF it can get low sulphur fuel.

Skaffa
[snapback]97049[/snapback]
BUT the particles are causing cancer, therefore Diesel is NOT the better fuel. It saves the climate a very very little, but kills ppl.

I'd never buy a Diesel! No matter how cheap the gas is. It is irresponsible. IMHO.
[snapback]97078[/snapback]
[/quote]

Iceman You are not serious!

If You listen doc's, Greens, etc. We can not eat, drink, burn or generally consume anything, because they cause cancer, mutations in DNA, extinction, global warming etc. You know that spoon is the worst killer in the world? Everyone who has used it has DIED!

And for Doug, You said it Your selve, US governmetn cares only LOCAL hazards, fuck the rest of the world! (I know You are inteligent human being and I don't have to use so hadr words, sorry. )

What comes to China and India... I have spend there several years and I know what it is. But unfortunately people care more about food, TV, car, leather sofa than clear air and clean water. Like in many other places. It comes when all above mentioned are achieved.

I WILL NOT FEEL RESPONSIBLE OF ANY HAZARDS CAUSED TO AIR OR EARTH BECAUSE I DRIVE 530d BMW!

For using too much electricity or water, pooring oil to the ground, peeing to the lake, throwing trash around I feel responsible and don't do it.

Skaffa
Old 03-04-2005, 05:06 AM
  #25  
Contributors
 
skaffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: -04 530D
Default

Originally Posted by wiszmaster' date='Mar 4 2005, 04:59 PM
diesels are great cars, for more than just gas milage. mainenance is also lower, no need to change your oil every 4K miles .. not that its required w/ the e60 .. but most other cars out there are still on a 4K service schedule.
[snapback]97092[/snapback]
Maintenance... Yeah, 183,21? for oil change! Of cource it includes 8,5L of oil, filter and disposal fee.

Skaffa
Old 03-04-2005, 05:08 AM
  #26  
Super Moderator
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 18,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: F02 LCI Individual
Model Year: 2013
Default

Originally Posted by skaffa' date='Mar 4 2005, 03:02 PM
Iceman You are not serious! ?
I WILL NOT FEEL RESPONSIBLE OF ANY HAZARDS CAUSED TO AIR OR EARTH BECAUSE I DRIVE 530d BMW!

For using too much electricity or water, pooring oil to the ground, peeing to the lake, throwing trash around I feel responsible and don't do it.
[snapback]97094[/snapback]
Sorry, I am serious, but I didn't meant the drivers are irresponsible. Should have wrote that better. The Industry is irresponsible. They could built cars with 500 HP that don't harm the environment or ppl.

Damn, I drive a V8, so I really don't mean the driver, skaffa. If I would mean the driver, I should have bought a 1series...
Old 03-04-2005, 05:18 AM
  #27  
Contributors
 
drjochen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 530i 6 speed
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman' date='Mar 4 2005, 09:38 AM
[quote name='skaffa' date='Mar 4 2005, 01:31 PM']If take motor without any external (catalyst, soot trap etc.) emission controll method, petrol is better.

Petrol:
-"no" particles
-low NOx (due lower burning temp)
-low SOx (depend of fuel, but generally better than diesel)
-high CO/CO2

Diesel:
-"high" particles
-"high" NOx (due high burning temp)
-"high" SOx (depend of fuel, but generally more than petrol)
-low CO/CO2

Today diesel is more clean than petrol IF it can get low sulphur fuel.

Skaffa
[snapback]97049[/snapback]
BUT the particles are causing cancer, therefore Diesel is NOT the better fuel. It saves the climate a very very little, but kills ppl.

I'd never buy a Diesel! No matter how cheap the gas is. It is irresponsible. IMHO.
[snapback]97078[/snapback]
[/quote]

Particulate trap technology has progressed quite a bit, so I would not worry about modern passenger cars at all. Their soot levels are extremly low now.

The real soot producers in Europe are the 20 year old semis from Poland, Russia etc. I grew up in northern Bavaria close to the A9. When I go back and drive there, the rocks next to the Autobahn on steep hills are almost black from the soot from these old stinkers. But then, the trucks here in the US are no better. Just look at your avarge dump truck or garbage truck with the black soot billowing out...

Btw., exhaust aftertreatment technology is still progressing, see for example
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/83/i05/8305notw4.html (a little self-advertising...)
Old 03-04-2005, 05:26 AM
  #28  
Super Moderator
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 18,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: F02 LCI Individual
Model Year: 2013
Default

Of course it's better today. But the Industry has the technology for "clean" cars for years, for decades to be accurate, and is not using it.

There are bigger problems than cars that harm the environment, so I really don't worry about cars too much.
If I would, I wouldn't be driving a V8, allthough my V8 is "cleaner" than the first cars I drove in my life...
Old 03-04-2005, 05:35 AM
  #29  
Contributors
 
skaffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: -04 530D
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman' date='Mar 4 2005, 05:08 PM
Sorry, I am serious, but I didn't meant the drivers are irresponsible. Should have wrote that better. The Industry is irresponsible. They could built cars with 500 HP that don't harm the environment or ppl.

Damn, I drive a V8, so I really don't mean the driver, skaffa. If I would mean the driver, I should have bought a 1series...
[snapback]97101[/snapback]
Yep, there You are right! BUT compare saying that,"guns don't kill!" Manufacturers make that what they can sell. Demand creates supply, like in drug business.

No hard feelings!

We all should have Prius or similar. But what ever we do we consume and if there is not enough supply also our consumption will end some day. Or consumption of some ppl that is...

I think BMW has (EURO4 cars) at the moment as enviroment friendly range as possible. We could make worse choice?

Skaffa
Old 03-04-2005, 05:45 AM
  #30  
Super Moderator
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 18,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: F02 LCI Individual
Model Year: 2013
Default

Originally Posted by skaffa' date='Mar 4 2005, 03:35 PM
I think BMW has (EURO4 cars) at the moment as enviroment friendly range as possible. We could make worse choice?
[snapback]97120[/snapback]
That's right!


Quick Reply: E60 Diesel in North America?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:02 PM.