does this look like a blown head gasket??
#11
New Members
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Respectfully, Bob P.
#12
Members
Senior Members
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, I think that the causes of water condensation in the crankcase due to blowby gasses containing water as referred to in the 1925 paper have been resolved.
Water does not remain in the oil system once the system has reached operating temperaures and the water vapours are effectively vented through the designed vent systems CCV. Glycol (which was not used extensively in 1925), however, does not boil off and that is what one usually sees as the result of a cooling system leak into the oil system.
Water does not remain in the oil system once the system has reached operating temperaures and the water vapours are effectively vented through the designed vent systems CCV. Glycol (which was not used extensively in 1925), however, does not boil off and that is what one usually sees as the result of a cooling system leak into the oil system.
Look at a standard oil lab report. There are separate measurements for water and antifreeze.
Unfortunately, you are ignoring what is COMMON KNOWLEDGE in the transportation industry.
While the article I cited was written in 1925 and tolerances in engines have certainly improved, the basic function of the engine and the existence of blow by has not.
I noticed you didn't respond to the other citation.
And here is another article written by an industry professional in 2007. Note section on water.
Four Lethal Diesel Engine Oil Contaminants
You are adopting a position that is untenable.
#13
New Members
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
YES - BUT YOU'VE ONLY GOT PART OF IT - If the car or truck engine doesn't reach operating temperature and the engine is turned off, the WATER VAPOR will condense into the oil, and will stay in the oil.
Look at a standard oil lab report. There are separate measurements for water and antifreeze.
Unfortunately, you are ignoring what is COMMON KNOWLEDGE in the transportation industry.
While the article I cited was written in 1925 and tolerances in engines have certainly improved, the basic function of the engine and the existence of blow by has not.
I noticed you didn't respond to the other citation.
And here is another article written by an industry professional in 2007. Note section on water.
Four Lethal Diesel Engine Oil Contaminants
You are adopting a position that is untenable.
Look at a standard oil lab report. There are separate measurements for water and antifreeze.
Unfortunately, you are ignoring what is COMMON KNOWLEDGE in the transportation industry.
While the article I cited was written in 1925 and tolerances in engines have certainly improved, the basic function of the engine and the existence of blow by has not.
I noticed you didn't respond to the other citation.
And here is another article written by an industry professional in 2007. Note section on water.
Four Lethal Diesel Engine Oil Contaminants
You are adopting a position that is untenable.
The OP (and others) was indicating that perhaps the signs that he saw were due to condensation and I simply posited that this was wishful thinking, since the small amount of condensation that might be present would not show up on a dip stick, but have evaporated. The milky residue evidenced, however, is not indicative of condensed water, but of glycol.
BTW, what is called common knowledge is not always correct. After all, it is common knowledge that heavier objects fall faster in a vacuum, but we know that to be incorrect!
With respect.
Bob P.
#14
Members
Senior Members
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am not disputing the fact that high levels of water are destructive to oil and engine. What I am disputing is the fact that the small amount of water that is present due to some condensation does not remain in the oil at normal operating temperatures, therefore, is not harmful. It is very rare to find large amounts of water in an oil sample without glycol at the same time. In fact, if the sample is taken while the engine is at operating temperaure, you might not find any water in the oil, but you might find some glycol, if there is a leak. If the leak is large, of course both water and glycol will be found, even at opearing temperaures. Obviously, if there is no coolant leak, you will not find water in the oil at engine operating temperaures, even if there was some condensation at start up. This is not speculation on my part, but learned through mpore than 40 yrs experience in operating chemical plants which were equiped with highly sophisticated internal combustion engines and turbines using complicated cooling and oil lubrication systems. Oil sampling was and is standard and we had better know our Tribology and signs of impending engine failures. Incidently, one of the plants I managed produced the ester which was used as the base stock for Castrol synthetic lubricants.
The OP (and others) was indicating that perhaps the signs that he saw were due to condensation and I simply posited that this was wishful thinking, since the small amount of condensation that might be present would not show up on a dip stick, but have evaporated. The milky residue evidenced, however, is not indicative of condensed water, but of glycol.
BTW, what is called common knowledge is not always correct. After all, it is common knowledge that heavier objects fall faster in a vacuum, but we know that to be incorrect!
With respect.
Bob P.
The OP (and others) was indicating that perhaps the signs that he saw were due to condensation and I simply posited that this was wishful thinking, since the small amount of condensation that might be present would not show up on a dip stick, but have evaporated. The milky residue evidenced, however, is not indicative of condensed water, but of glycol.
BTW, what is called common knowledge is not always correct. After all, it is common knowledge that heavier objects fall faster in a vacuum, but we know that to be incorrect!
With respect.
Bob P.
But if I understand correctly, now your contention is that modern engines don't experience difficulties with blowby gases, and as soon as the engine reaches operating temperature that this water completely disappears and everything is fine. The service bulletin below from BMW warning of water freezing in the CCV seems to suggest otherwise.
You compare your experience of lubricants in process manufacturing to automobiles but that is hardly a good comparison as process machinery can run weeks or months without shutting down, and is hardly a parallel example to a 1 mile trip in cold weather to the drug store and then putting the car in the garage for a week.
If the short trips are the only thing a car experiences for extended periods (days, weeks, months) a significant amount of water can accumulate and sit in the oil for an extended period of time. Some mechanics in Canada relate (albeit extreme) stories of water that has settled to the bottom of the sump and seeing 8-10 ounces run out when the drain plug is pulled (without a leaking head gasket).
Having experience in the manufacture of esters, you certainly know that contact with water can break down esters back into their constituent alcohol and acid parts. And the example of another additive that can be "water stripped" is the one we have been discussing where the zinc dithio diphosphate contained in anti-oxidant and anti-wear additives can quickly emulsify into "mayonnaise". Once this damage to the oil has occurred, bringing the engine oil up to operating temperature will not undo it.
You could be correct in your guess that the OP is on the way to a new head gasket, but there are also examples of the existence of mayonnaise that an oil change and a change in driving habits has corrected.
#15
Members
Senior Members
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
6 Posts
My Ride: 530i
Model Year: 2004
Engine: M54
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Judd Hirsch. Just got off the phone with him. He agrees that condensation on an oil cap isn't necessarily an indication of head gasket failure. He also wants a yoo-hoo. I told him maybe tomorrow, I'm fresh out at the moment.
Last edited by KyleB; 01-15-2014 at 05:19 PM.
#16
New Members
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I guess we are now treading water. My original response was to your contention that the only way water can get into the closed oil system is through a leak from a higher pressure water coolant system". You now seem to acknowledge that yes, blowby from combustion happens.
Yes, we can agree on that, but we also agree that this is not the cause of this accumulation of water. Nice pun BTW.
But if I understand correctly, now your contention is that modern engines don't experience difficulties with blowby gases, and as soon as the engine reaches operating temperature that this water completely disappears and everything is fine. The service bulletin below from BMW warning of water freezing in the CCV seems to suggest otherwise.
The service bulletin only deals with the consequences of water, not the cause. The fact that there is some freezing of the water vapour inthe CCV system proves that the water is being vented through the system and not remaining in the oil.
You compare your experience of lubricants in process manufacturing to automobiles but that is hardly a good comparison as process machinery can run weeks or months without shutting down, and is hardly a parallel example to a 1 mile trip in cold weather to the drug store and then putting the car in the garage for a week.
If the short trips are the only thing a car experiences for extended periods (days, weeks, months) a significant amount of water can accumulate and sit in the oil for an extended period of time. Some mechanics in Canada relate (albeit extreme) stories of water that has settled to the bottom of the sump and seeing 8-10 ounces run out when the drain plug is pulled (without a leaking head gasket).
True, and that is where you will see the condensate under those conditions - separated from the oil, not in the oil. You will not see it at the oil cap or inside the valve cover. You will see the milky glycol remenants however. Of course, if the water is not removed from the sump, the level might get high enough to be pumped into the engine lubricating system, with dire consequences.
Having experience in the manufacture of esters, you certainly know that contact with water can break down esters back into their constituent alcohol and acid parts.
You need higher temperatures than experienced in the oil system and a catalyst for the reaction to be reversed. Esters are very stable and water tolerant.
And the example of another additive that can be "water stripped" is the one we have been discussing where the zinc dithio diphosphate contained in anti-oxidant and anti-wear additives can quickly emulsify into "mayonnaise". Once this damage to the oil has occurred, bringing the engine oil up to operating temperature will not undo it.
Again, this is true if a lot of water is present, which is not the case for a properly running engine. There are other additives that serve to 'absorb' small quantities of water to mitgate this.
You could be correct in your guess that the OP is on the way to a new head gasket, but there are also examples of the existence of mayonnaise that an oil change and a change in driving habits has corrected.
Yes, we can agree on that, but we also agree that this is not the cause of this accumulation of water. Nice pun BTW.
But if I understand correctly, now your contention is that modern engines don't experience difficulties with blowby gases, and as soon as the engine reaches operating temperature that this water completely disappears and everything is fine. The service bulletin below from BMW warning of water freezing in the CCV seems to suggest otherwise.
The service bulletin only deals with the consequences of water, not the cause. The fact that there is some freezing of the water vapour inthe CCV system proves that the water is being vented through the system and not remaining in the oil.
You compare your experience of lubricants in process manufacturing to automobiles but that is hardly a good comparison as process machinery can run weeks or months without shutting down, and is hardly a parallel example to a 1 mile trip in cold weather to the drug store and then putting the car in the garage for a week.
If the short trips are the only thing a car experiences for extended periods (days, weeks, months) a significant amount of water can accumulate and sit in the oil for an extended period of time. Some mechanics in Canada relate (albeit extreme) stories of water that has settled to the bottom of the sump and seeing 8-10 ounces run out when the drain plug is pulled (without a leaking head gasket).
True, and that is where you will see the condensate under those conditions - separated from the oil, not in the oil. You will not see it at the oil cap or inside the valve cover. You will see the milky glycol remenants however. Of course, if the water is not removed from the sump, the level might get high enough to be pumped into the engine lubricating system, with dire consequences.
Having experience in the manufacture of esters, you certainly know that contact with water can break down esters back into their constituent alcohol and acid parts.
You need higher temperatures than experienced in the oil system and a catalyst for the reaction to be reversed. Esters are very stable and water tolerant.
And the example of another additive that can be "water stripped" is the one we have been discussing where the zinc dithio diphosphate contained in anti-oxidant and anti-wear additives can quickly emulsify into "mayonnaise". Once this damage to the oil has occurred, bringing the engine oil up to operating temperature will not undo it.
Again, this is true if a lot of water is present, which is not the case for a properly running engine. There are other additives that serve to 'absorb' small quantities of water to mitgate this.
You could be correct in your guess that the OP is on the way to a new head gasket, but there are also examples of the existence of mayonnaise that an oil change and a change in driving habits has corrected.
I might have oversimplified my case in my original statements, but I simply wanted to dispell a common myth about 'condensation in my oil system'.
Just like the common myth of 'warped brake rotors'.
Respectfully, Bob P.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wonky
E60, E61 Parts, Accessories and Mods
4
04-12-2016 08:15 PM