E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Chose 550i over 545i because...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2005 | 11:06 PM
  #21  
NinthSwat's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
My Ride: '01 E46 M3, stock w/ angel eyes :)
Default

Originally Posted by LuvE60' date='Apr 12 2005, 01:13 AM
All this being said, I am just not that worried about it.? The M5 has 175 more HP, and is basically 1 second faster from 0-60 (4.7 is what I usually see.? Some say 4.5 but for my argument, lets say 4.7.).? Yes that is a lot, but when you take into consideration that the M5 is also lighter, how much more performance are you going to get from 35 more HP.? Yes, it will be quicker, and faster, but not enough to notice a significant difference.? What, instead of 5.7, it might do zero to sixty in 5.5 seconds.? I just don't see the values of the 545 plumeting overnight.? The 540 is still doing fine on the resale market.
[snapback]114275[/snapback]
Well, extra HP wont change much right, but the main factor is torgue increase 4400cm^2 vs 4800cm^2
Since 745 is 0.5s slower to 100km/h(62miles/h) then current 750, so its possible that 550 will be 0.5s faster then current 545, which is 5.3 vs 5.8s to 100km/h - E39 M5 figure.
Old 04-11-2005 | 11:12 PM
  #22  
swajames's Avatar
Contributors
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California, USA
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by NinthSwat' date='Apr 12 2005, 12:06 AM
[quote name='LuvE60' date='Apr 12 2005, 01:13 AM']All this being said, I am just not that worried about it.? The M5 has 175 more HP, and is basically 1 second faster from 0-60 (4.7 is what I usually see.? Some say 4.5 but for my argument, lets say 4.7.).? Yes that is a lot, but when you take into consideration that the M5 is also lighter, how much more performance are you going to get from 35 more HP.? Yes, it will be quicker, and faster, but not enough to notice a significant difference.? What, instead of 5.7, it might do zero to sixty in 5.5 seconds.? I just don't see the values of the 545 plumeting overnight.? The 540 is still doing fine on the resale market.
[snapback]114275[/snapback]
Well, extra HP wont change much right, but the main factor is torgue increase 4400cm^2 vs 4800cm^2
Since 745 is 0.5s slower to 100km/h(62miles/h) then current 750, so its possible that 550 will be 0.5s faster then current 545, which is 5.3 vs 5.8s to 100km/h - E39 M5 figure.
[snapback]114381[/snapback]
[/quote]

The 545 has tested at 5.3 to 5.4 in a number of reviews already - the official figure of 5.8 is probably on the low side.
Old 04-11-2005 | 11:35 PM
  #23  
fishskis's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
My Ride: 2002 M3 Convertible SMG Silver/Black 2005 545i ED Jet Black/Beige
Default

Originally Posted by NinthSwat' date='Apr 12 2005, 12:06 AM
[quote name='LuvE60' date='Apr 12 2005, 01:13 AM']All this being said, I am just not that worried about it.? The M5 has 175 more HP, and is basically 1 second faster from 0-60 (4.7 is what I usually see.? Some say 4.5 but for my argument, lets say 4.7.).? Yes that is a lot, but when you take into consideration that the M5 is also lighter, how much more performance are you going to get from 35 more HP.? Yes, it will be quicker, and faster, but not enough to notice a significant difference.? What, instead of 5.7, it might do zero to sixty in 5.5 seconds.? I just don't see the values of the 545 plumeting overnight.? The 540 is still doing fine on the resale market.
[snapback]114275[/snapback]
Well, extra HP wont change much right, but the main factor is torgue increase 4400cm^2 vs 4800cm^2
Since 745 is 0.5s slower to 100km/h(62miles/h) then current 750, so its possible that 550 will be 0.5s faster then current 545, which is 5.3 vs 5.8s to 100km/h - E39 M5 figure.
[snapback]114381[/snapback]
[/quote]

I am not sure where you are getting your information. The only test results I have seen show only a .1 second improvement from 5.9 to 5.8 seconds for the 750i compared to the 745i 0-60.
Old 04-12-2005 | 02:16 AM
  #24  
NinthSwat's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
My Ride: '01 E46 M3, stock w/ angel eyes :)
Default

Originally Posted by fishskis' date='Apr 12 2005, 09:35 AM
[quote name='NinthSwat' date='Apr 12 2005, 12:06 AM'][quote name='LuvE60' date='Apr 12 2005, 01:13 AM']All this being said, I am just not that worried about it.? The M5 has 175 more HP, and is basically 1 second faster from 0-60 (4.7 is what I usually see.? Some say 4.5 but for my argument, lets say 4.7.).? Yes that is a lot, but when you take into consideration that the M5 is also lighter, how much more performance are you going to get from 35 more HP.? Yes, it will be quicker, and faster, but not enough to notice a significant difference.? What, instead of 5.7, it might do zero to sixty in 5.5 seconds.? I just don't see the values of the 545 plumeting overnight.? The 540 is still doing fine on the resale market.
[snapback]114275[/snapback]
Well, extra HP wont change much right, but the main factor is torgue increase 4400cm^2 vs 4800cm^2
Since 745 is 0.5s slower to 100km/h(62miles/h) then current 750, so its possible that 550 will be 0.5s faster then current 545, which is 5.3 vs 5.8s to 100km/h - E39 M5 figure.
[snapback]114381[/snapback]
[/quote]

I am not sure where you are getting your information. The only test results I have seen show only a .1 second improvement from 5.9 to 5.8 seconds for the 750i compared to the 745i 0-60.
[snapback]114386[/snapback]
[/quote]


fishskis, its official information www.bmw.de
Old 04-12-2005 | 04:13 AM
  #25  
BurgessMW's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
My Ride: 545i, Steptronic, coldweather, comfort seats, Logic 7, front/rear seat heaters, navigation. sirius
Default

Originally Posted by Merzbow' date='Apr 11 2005, 04:20 PM
After much deliberation I've decided to wait for the 550i instead of picking up a 545i now. My dealer confirmed it was coming in the fall, and within the next two months he'll be able to place an order for one.

My first priority is performance, so it's difficult for me to turn down the 10% bump in hp and torque.
[snapback]114238[/snapback]
If your first priority is performance, wouldn't the M5 be a better choice?
Old 04-12-2005 | 07:42 AM
  #26  
jsal's Avatar
Senior Members
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
My Ride: 2004 545i - 6 speed manual (July 04 build), silver-grey/black, sports package std equipment (18", active roll, active steering, adaptive headlights), premium sound, bluetooth enabled, folding rear seat, lumbar, 3m hood/bumper protective film, rear tint, euro reflectors.
Default

Good choice to wait - you are so close to the change-over.

When I was waiting for my 545i, a new X5 4.8 came in. I knew the change-over would come, but I did not realize so soon.

Although the 550 is not a huge increase over the 545, I am kind of bummed that mine is already not the newest within one year old.

The wait will suck, but you will enjoy it when you get it.
Old 04-12-2005 | 09:22 AM
  #27  
fishskis's Avatar
Members
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
My Ride: 2002 M3 Convertible SMG Silver/Black 2005 545i ED Jet Black/Beige
Default

Originally Posted by NinthSwat' date='Apr 12 2005, 03:16 AM
[quote name='fishskis' date='Apr 12 2005, 09:35 AM'][quote name='NinthSwat' date='Apr 12 2005, 12:06 AM'][quote name='LuvE60' date='Apr 12 2005, 01:13 AM']All this being said, I am just not that worried about it.? The M5 has 175 more HP, and is basically 1 second faster from 0-60 (4.7 is what I usually see.? Some say 4.5 but for my argument, lets say 4.7.).? Yes that is a lot, but when you take into consideration that the M5 is also lighter, how much more performance are you going to get from 35 more HP.? Yes, it will be quicker, and faster, but not enough to notice a significant difference.? What, instead of 5.7, it might do zero to sixty in 5.5 seconds.? I just don't see the values of the 545 plumeting overnight.? The 540 is still doing fine on the resale market.
[snapback]114275[/snapback]
Well, extra HP wont change much right, but the main factor is torgue increase 4400cm^2 vs 4800cm^2
Since 745 is 0.5s slower to 100km/h(62miles/h) then current 750, so its possible that 550 will be 0.5s faster then current 545, which is 5.3 vs 5.8s to 100km/h - E39 M5 figure.
[snapback]114381[/snapback]
[/quote]

I am not sure where you are getting your information. The only test results I have seen show only a .1 second improvement from 5.9 to 5.8 seconds for the 750i compared to the 745i 0-60.
[snapback]114386[/snapback]
[/quote]


fishskis, its official information www.bmw.de
[snapback]114406[/snapback]
[/quote]

While I admit my german comprehension is almost nonexistent, the following is taken from the BMW.DE website:"BMW 750i in 5,9 Sekunden von 0 auf 100 km/h beschleunigt - begleitet vom sonoren Klang seines V8." I translate this as indicating the 750 officially does 0-62 mph in 5.9 seconds. BMW officially rates the 745 at 5.9 seconds for 0-60 mph, and the numbers I have seen for the 745i 0-62 are 6.0 seconds even.

To me, this looks like a .1 second difference, not a .5 second difference.

Am I missing something?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bimmerZ
E60 Discussion
17
05-13-2024 09:05 AM
Zimo
E60 Discussion
13
04-11-2018 08:25 PM
gray545i
E60 Discussion
7
08-05-2015 07:15 AM
PelicanParts.com
Vendor Classifieds
0
07-23-2015 12:29 PM
w8199
E60 Discussion
7
07-17-2015 04:59 PM



Quick Reply: Chose 550i over 545i because...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 AM.