E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

535d vs M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2005, 08:23 AM
  #11  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by browellm' post='205699' date='Dec 1 2005, 11:40 AM
Torque can't be that much of a factor if the RX-8 posted the same time.
You have a point there, but the RX-8 revs to what?--9,000 RPM? With 9,000 RPM one can do wonders with low torque. But, still, you may be totally correct. On the other hand, I know that the legendary 93-95 RX-7 would give nothing up because of lack of torque on any track.
Old 12-01-2005, 08:36 AM
  #12  
Members
 
juliann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cornwall / Suffolk UK
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535d Sport Tourer - E34 M5 Race Car
Default

Originally Posted by Merv the Derv' post='205688' date='Dec 1 2005, 04:19 PM
Perhaps the Stig drove the 535d and JC the M3.

Anyway why could it not be true. Yes the std M3 is race tuned but lets not forget the 535d is a deceptively very fast car. The TG track has a lot of slow speed stages and this must be where the huge torque of the 5 outweighs the sheer power of the m3. The 0 - 62 time of 6.5 secs for the 535d doesn't really reflect the way the car drives.

Autocar have tested both cars and the M3 easily beats the 5 in all areas apart from 50 - 70mph where the M3 took 7.7secs and the 5 only 3.3secs. Not sure whether thats through the gears or top gear.
That 50-70mph must be 6th in the M3 and kickdown thro' gears in 535d.
Having owned both, I struggle with then both getting the same lap times with the same conditions, same driver & level of commitment - I guess the flaw in in one of more of those.
Old 12-01-2005, 09:38 AM
  #13  
Contributors
 
Merv the Derv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stourbridge, UK
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535D Sport Auto
Default

Originally Posted by juliann' post='205716
Perhaps the Stig drove the 535d and JC the M3.

Anyway why could it not be true. Yes the std M3 is race tuned but lets not forget the 535d is a deceptively very fast car. The TG track has a lot of slow speed stages and this must be where the huge torque of the 5 outweighs the sheer power of the m3. The 0 - 62 time of 6.5 secs for the 535d doesn't really reflect the way the car drives.

Autocar have tested both cars and the M3 easily beats the 5 in all areas apart from 50 - 70mph where the M3 took 7.7secs and the 5 only 3.3secs. Not sure whether thats through the gears or top gear.
That 50-70mph must be 6th in the M3 and kickdown thro' gears in 535d.
Having owned both, I struggle with then both getting the same lap times with the same conditions, same driver & level of commitment - I guess the flaw in in one of more of those.
[/quote]

Never driven an M3 but I know that 0 - 100mph in 11.5 seconds is bloody fast.
I can't really understand why the 535 posted the same time as the M3 but if you have driven both then you should know the truth and it sounds like theres been some sort of mistake.

However if the time for the 535d is correct then I'm amazed at some of the cars further down the list such as Lotus, Aston Martin etc.
Old 12-01-2005, 09:48 AM
  #14  
Senior Members
 
Don Juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Florida -
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some o0ther factors must of been playin, as weather temperature, etc for example how a volswage can make the same time of an SL55 mercedes

Mercedes SL 55 AMG - 1.33.2
Volkswagen Golf R32 - 1.33.2
Old 12-01-2005, 10:14 AM
  #15  
Contributors
 
znod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Default

Originally Posted by ISUK' post='205657' date='Dec 1 2005, 10:10 AM
You can see all of the Top Gear laps times HERE and there is also a diagram of the track.
Thanks much. I just looked. And, the Lotus Elise is just 135.6. I'll have to check the site out more closely later and see who drives, etc. At first glance, you can't tell anything about the cars. Chevrolet Corvette?
Old 12-01-2005, 10:25 AM
  #16  
Senior Members
 
jet190rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: '05 545i - scheduled for ED pickup in Munich on 7/22!
Default

The reason why the M3 and 535d have the same lap time is because the M3 was driven by the old Black Stig and the 535d was driven by the new White Stig.

The White Stig is reportedly a variety of racing drivers but each one always drives A LOT more aggresively than the Black Stig, who was Perry McCarthy.
Old 12-01-2005, 11:04 AM
  #17  
Senior Members
 
JayJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England, UK
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It could be that the torque through 50-70 is where the car spends most of its time on the track so the 535 has an extra bit of speed in this area but only this area so keeps up with the M3 time wise. If the entire track was between 50 - 70mph corners then the 535d would be faster surely?

or is there a flaw in my logic

oh and RIP Black stig

your launch off an aircraft carrier was a noble way to go :-(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/downloads/rip...g_broadband.ram
Old 12-01-2005, 11:21 AM
  #18  
Contributors
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
Default

Originally Posted by JayJay' post='205763' date='Dec 1 2005, 12:04 PM
It could be that the torque through 50-70 is where the car spends most of its time on the track so the 535 has an extra bit of speed in this area but only this area so keeps up with the M3 time wise. If the entire track was between 50 - 70mph corners then the 535d would be faster surely?

or is there a flaw in my logic

oh and RIP Black stig

your launch off an aircraft carrier was a noble way to go :-(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/downloads/rip...g_broadband.ram
Keeping the M3 up in the rev band would more than make up for the torque differences, I suspect it's just down to driver and track conditions. On the day anything and anyone can beat anything and anyone, as an example take a look at Sheb's post on another thread about the Maserati Quattroporte recording a time that equalled or beat the E60 M5 around one magazine's test track.
Old 12-01-2005, 12:45 PM
  #19  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
BetterMakeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames' post='205771
It could be that the torque through 50-70 is where the car spends most of its time on the track so the 535 has an extra bit of speed in this area but only this area so keeps up with the M3 time wise. If the entire track was between 50 - 70mph corners then the 535d would be faster surely?

or is there a flaw in my logic

oh and RIP Black stig

your launch off an aircraft carrier was a noble way to go :-(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/downloads/rip...g_broadband.ram
Keeping the M3 up in the rev band would more than make up for the torque differences, I suspect it's just down to driver and track conditions. On the day anything and anyone can beat anything and anyone, as an example take a look at Sheb's post on another thread about the Maserati Quattroporte recording a time that equalled or beat the E60 M5 around one magazine's test track.
[/quote]
Oh come on...please don't revive that post again...nothing creative is achived in that dbate.
IMO, as i am a tg fan, it could be as jet190rs said, the change in drivers. Otherwise i can't see the difference. For sure the M3 could make out the torque difference by just keeping the rev band. Dunno...i for one think so, that the change (if they changed) of drivers.
Bare in mind that the lap times on their site are not stated with dry/wet lap. I think that's why we see the same time for the sl55 with the golf r32. If i remember corectly the sl test was in wet and for sure the golf's one was in dry.
Old 12-01-2005, 12:49 PM
  #20  
Members
 
Rich535d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree that the times of many of the cars seem strange. Look at the time of the M3 CSL (1.28) vs. the standard M3 (1.31.8). Thats a very big difference.


Quick Reply: 535d vs M3



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:57 PM.