5-series Straight-line Performance Discussion
#11
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And, yes, the Step's gearing is superior for straight-line performance--all other things equal. For example, just multiply corresponding single (e.g., first) gear ratios and rear-end ratios for the trannys being compared. When doing so for the Step versus the SMG/manual, one finds that the calculations for the Step imply, from an overall perspective, that the Step is better at producing rear-wheel torque for straight-line performance at least through the 1/4--other things equal.
However, a counteracting force is that the Step should, because of the inherent inefficiencies of autos, produce a greater loss in rear-wheel torque than the other trannys--about 5% more. So, considering matters for only first gear,
Step--4.17 X 3.38 = 14.1 (big advantage to the Step to this point)
SMG--4.17 X 2.93 = 12.42
14.1 - 12.42 = 1.68; 1.68 / 12.42 = 7.4% more rear-wheel torque for the Step other things equal.
Additionally, for example, .074(330 ft lbs) > .05(330); thus, even after factoring in torque losses from incremental auto tranny inefficiency, the Step comes out ahead, in theory, in rear-wheel torque and, thus, in straight-line performance in first gear. This sort of analysis holds, from an overall perspective, through at least the 1/4 mile.
Originally Posted by grogan545' post='246210' date='Feb 26 2006, 07:21 AM
1/4 speed 105.50
1/4 time 13.50
1/8 speed 82.7
1/8 time 8.80
0-60 5.10
60' 2.05
new altitude 400',temp 38 F,barometer 29.98,dew point 19 F
1/4 time 13.50
1/8 speed 82.7
1/8 time 8.80
0-60 5.10
60' 2.05
new altitude 400',temp 38 F,barometer 29.98,dew point 19 F
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
May I ask you to post results on the testing thread. Then, I'll repost whatever you want in post #1 of this thread. I am hoping to keep this thread somewhat uncomplicated by results and too much detail. Please don't feel the need to remove anything from your above post. Thanks much.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
Have a great trip.
#12
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Znod' post='246221' date='Feb 26 2006, 09:15 AM
Thanks very much g-man. And, I am glad you have found a good new site. Be careful.
You have had a great start on the new site. I'll do the calculations and insert all results into post #1 above.
May I ask you to post results on the testing thread. Then, I'll repost whatever you want in post #1 of this thread. I am hoping to keep this thread somewhat uncomplicated by results and too much detail. Please don't feel the need to remove anything from your above post. Thanks much.
Have a great trip.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
May I ask you to post results on the testing thread. Then, I'll repost whatever you want in post #1 of this thread. I am hoping to keep this thread somewhat uncomplicated by results and too much detail. Please don't feel the need to remove anything from your above post. Thanks much.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
Have a great trip.
#13
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by grogan545' post='246235' date='Feb 26 2006, 10:09 AM
Not a problem Zman.It is a good idea to keep this new site uncluttered.
I have updated my bests in post #1 above for two runs today. They were good runs, but, initially, I thought they were not as good as yesterday. However, as shown above, they were very good on an adjusted basis. I am glad that we have stated adjusting for weather and altitude so we can see more clearly what is going on.
I will be posting grogan's undated data to post #1 later today since I have to do some other things now. Please check back for my update of his data.
#14
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Znod' post='246256' date='Feb 26 2006, 11:43 AM
To All:
I have updated my bests in post #1 above for two runs today. They were good runs, but, initially, I thought they were not as good as yesterday. However, as shown above, they were very good on an unadjusted basis. I am glad that we have stated adjusting for weather and altitude so we can see more clearly what is going on.
I will be posting grogan's undated data to post #1 later today since I have to do some other things now. Please check back for my update of his data.
I have updated my bests in post #1 above for two runs today. They were good runs, but, initially, I thought they were not as good as yesterday. However, as shown above, they were very good on an unadjusted basis. I am glad that we have stated adjusting for weather and altitude so we can see more clearly what is going on.
I will be posting grogan's undated data to post #1 later today since I have to do some other things now. Please check back for my update of his data.
I found more info on weather corrections.Type in "national dragster weather 101"in search.There is an indepth disertation on weather effects on HP and ET.
#15
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA, NJ
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2007 BMW 550, Sport, Navi, PS, CWP, Sirius
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by grogan545' post='246210' date='Feb 26 2006, 07:21 AM
Great idea with the new thread Znod.I have found a new test site which allows for full 1/4 runs.It does have some drawbacks,high traffic,can test in one direction only.Can only make 1 run at a time due to traffic(don't want to draw the law).I made 1 run yesterday with a below average start(some intrusion by controls)but is a new starting point.
1/4 speed 105.50
1/4 time 13.50
1/8 speed 82.7
1/8 time 8.80
0-60 5.10
60' 2.05
new altitude 400',temp 38 F,barometer 29.98,dew point 19 F
Zman could you do the corrections for me?You can just give me the equivilent altitude,I have the NHRA altitude chart.
1/4 speed 105.50
1/4 time 13.50
1/8 speed 82.7
1/8 time 8.80
0-60 5.10
60' 2.05
new altitude 400',temp 38 F,barometer 29.98,dew point 19 F
Zman could you do the corrections for me?You can just give me the equivilent altitude,I have the NHRA altitude chart.
#16
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SergeyM' post='246273' date='Feb 26 2006, 01:06 PM
Are the above numbers for a stock 545 auto? If so the car should be taken to a race track. The race track 1/4 time and speed will bring you back to reality. 545 is not mid-13th car.
BMW 545i--Steptronic RT 6/05 3814 5.2 13.7 104.0.
The above times/speed have not been adjusted for either altitude or weather. And, we are better drivers than the magazine drivers.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
I do understand your concern, however. Here is what I observed when I started testing. The more I tested two things happened: (1) I got better at what I was doing and (2) My car got significantly faster. At the outset, my times/speeds were not as good as those of the magazines--even the ones getting the worse times/speed. So, I can see how the magazine times/speed might not adequately represent the capabilites of the 545i.
#17
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by grogan545' post='246260' date='Feb 26 2006, 11:57 AM
Looking better all the time Zman.It looks like you are back to or faster than pre 20.01 performance.
I found more info on weather corrections.Type in "national dragster weather 101"in search.There is an indepth disertation on weather effects on HP and ET.
I found more info on weather corrections.Type in "national dragster weather 101"in search.There is an indepth disertation on weather effects on HP and ET.
Incidentally, I misunderstood before. I'll put the corrections factors on the other thread right away. Sorry I misunderstood. But, let me know if you want me to do the corrections and post your new data above. If so, then should I correct your old data also?
I won't post any more data for you until you let me know for sure what you want me to do or to post. Sorry again that I misunderstood.
#18
Contributors
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FLA - East Coast, USA
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Znod' post='246220' date='Feb 26 2006, 09:06 AM
Thanks much Eric. I am hoping the tread will be informative and enjoyable. Yes, definitely; gearing, of course, is highly pertinent to straight-line performance as you know.
And, yes, the Step's gearing is superior for straight-line performance--all other things equal. For example, just multiply corresponding single (e.g., first) gear ratios and rear-end ratios for the trannys being compared. When doing so for the Step versus the SMG/manual, one finds that the calculations for the Step imply, from an overall perspective, that the Step is better at producing rear-wheel torque for straight-line performance at least through the 1/4--other things equal.
However, a counteracting force is that the Step should, because of the inherent inefficiencies of autos, produce a greater loss in rear-wheel torque than the other trannys--about 5% more. So, considering matters for only first gear,
Step--4.17 X 3.38 = 14.1 (big advantage to the Step to this point)
SMG--4.17 X 2.93 = 12.42
14.1 - 12.42 = 1.68; 1.68 / 12.42 = 7.4% more rear-wheel torque for the Step other things equal.
Additionally, for example, .074(330 ft lbs) > .05(330); thus, even after factoring in torque losses from incremental auto tranny inefficiency, the Step comes out ahead, in theory, in rear-wheel torque and, thus, in straight-line performance in first gear. This sort of analysis holds, from an overall perspective, through at least the 1/4 mile.
And, yes, the Step's gearing is superior for straight-line performance--all other things equal. For example, just multiply corresponding single (e.g., first) gear ratios and rear-end ratios for the trannys being compared. When doing so for the Step versus the SMG/manual, one finds that the calculations for the Step imply, from an overall perspective, that the Step is better at producing rear-wheel torque for straight-line performance at least through the 1/4--other things equal.
However, a counteracting force is that the Step should, because of the inherent inefficiencies of autos, produce a greater loss in rear-wheel torque than the other trannys--about 5% more. So, considering matters for only first gear,
Step--4.17 X 3.38 = 14.1 (big advantage to the Step to this point)
SMG--4.17 X 2.93 = 12.42
14.1 - 12.42 = 1.68; 1.68 / 12.42 = 7.4% more rear-wheel torque for the Step other things equal.
Additionally, for example, .074(330 ft lbs) > .05(330); thus, even after factoring in torque losses from incremental auto tranny inefficiency, the Step comes out ahead, in theory, in rear-wheel torque and, thus, in straight-line performance in first gear. This sort of analysis holds, from an overall perspective, through at least the 1/4 mile.
Lets put these numbers over here for reference (also in another thread)
The final drive in SMG/Manual = 2.93
The final drive in Step = 3.38
First gear in SMG/Manual = 4.05
First gear in Step = 4.17
2nd gear in SMG/Manual = 2.4
2nd gear in Step = 2.34
Total ratio:
1st in SMG/Manual = 11.87
1st in Step = 14.09
2nd in SMG/Manual = 7.03
2nd in Step = 7.91
Each will get to 60 MPH in 2nd gear but you are getting into the power band quicker in the case of the Step. So there is an offset (tradeoff) to the slower shift in the Step and torque converter losses.
The Step gains in the economy area as both 5th (0.87) and 6th (0.69) are OD ratios while only 6th (0.87) in the SMG/Manual is an OD ratio.
For completness I'll repost a chart I made up. In this case I stripped out the 645 data so as not to confuse.
#19
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Znod' post='246220' date='Feb 26 2006, 06:06 AM
Thanks much Eric. I am hoping the tread will be informative and enjoyable. Yes, definitely; gearing, of course, is highly pertinent to straight-line performance as you know.
And, yes, the Step's gearing is superior for straight-line performance--all other things equal. For example, just multiply corresponding single (e.g., first) gear ratios and rear-end ratios for the trannys being compared. When doing so for the Step versus the SMG/manual, one finds that the calculations for the Step imply, from an overall perspective, that the Step is better at producing rear-wheel torque for straight-line performance at least through the 1/4--other things equal.
However, a counteracting force is that the Step should, because of the inherent inefficiencies of autos, produce a greater loss in rear-wheel torque than the other trannys--about 5% more. So, considering matters for only first gear,
Step--4.17 X 3.38 = 14.1 (big advantage to the Step to this point)
SMG--4.17 X 2.93 = 12.42
14.1 - 12.42 = 1.68; 1.68 / 12.42 = 7.4% more rear-wheel torque for the Step other things equal.
Additionally, for example, .074(330 ft lbs) > .05(330); thus, even after factoring in torque losses from incremental auto tranny inefficiency, the Step comes out ahead, in theory, in rear-wheel torque and, thus, in straight-line performance in first gear. This sort of analysis holds, from an overall perspective, through at least the 1/4 mile.
And, yes, the Step's gearing is superior for straight-line performance--all other things equal. For example, just multiply corresponding single (e.g., first) gear ratios and rear-end ratios for the trannys being compared. When doing so for the Step versus the SMG/manual, one finds that the calculations for the Step imply, from an overall perspective, that the Step is better at producing rear-wheel torque for straight-line performance at least through the 1/4--other things equal.
However, a counteracting force is that the Step should, because of the inherent inefficiencies of autos, produce a greater loss in rear-wheel torque than the other trannys--about 5% more. So, considering matters for only first gear,
Step--4.17 X 3.38 = 14.1 (big advantage to the Step to this point)
SMG--4.17 X 2.93 = 12.42
14.1 - 12.42 = 1.68; 1.68 / 12.42 = 7.4% more rear-wheel torque for the Step other things equal.
Additionally, for example, .074(330 ft lbs) > .05(330); thus, even after factoring in torque losses from incremental auto tranny inefficiency, the Step comes out ahead, in theory, in rear-wheel torque and, thus, in straight-line performance in first gear. This sort of analysis holds, from an overall perspective, through at least the 1/4 mile.
![Tongue](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/tongue.gif)
Nah I love how the SMG feels! More sporty to me. Like the crisp shift feel knowing when it got into gear.
![Smile](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/smile.gif)
#20
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: southestern pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 550I,manufactured 2-27-08,delivered 4-2-08.Platinum bronze,natural brown interior,light poplar trim,cold weather package,heated rear seats,HD radio
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SergeyM' post='246273' date='Feb 26 2006, 01:06 PM
Are the above numbers for a stock 545 auto? If so the car should be taken to a race track. The race track 1/4 time and speed will bring you back to reality. 545 is not mid-13th car.