Need advice on a Wagon
#1
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
My father is shopping for a wagon and have looked at:
1. VW Passat Wagon
2. Subaru Outback/Impreza/legacy
He is looking for a bare basic auto tranny. Please give advice based on value and pros/cons. The wagons are fairly priced comparably, but he has a bias against cars with German origin versus Japanese. Personally, I prefer the Passat Wagon over the Subaru, but what do you guys/gals think based on your experience or 2nd or 3rd hand experience (from friends). He wants to go fishing with it so he's sticking with the smallest engine. In summary please recommend base on:
1. Value
2. Reliability (engine and parts)
3. Features for the buck (money)
4. Fun to drive (looks too)
5. and anything else.
Thank you very much.
1. VW Passat Wagon
2. Subaru Outback/Impreza/legacy
He is looking for a bare basic auto tranny. Please give advice based on value and pros/cons. The wagons are fairly priced comparably, but he has a bias against cars with German origin versus Japanese. Personally, I prefer the Passat Wagon over the Subaru, but what do you guys/gals think based on your experience or 2nd or 3rd hand experience (from friends). He wants to go fishing with it so he's sticking with the smallest engine. In summary please recommend base on:
1. Value
2. Reliability (engine and parts)
3. Features for the buck (money)
4. Fun to drive (looks too)
5. and anything else.
Thank you very much.
#4
Okay, this is a good topic for me....I've owned a subaru wagon, passat wagon, and now 530xi wagon.
The passat will drive WAY better. However, it's NOT AWD, unless you get the 3.6 4motion. Then you're looking at big $$$$.
Nevertheless, the passat will drive better. Handling, comfort, fun.
Subarus ARE NOT as reliable as people would like to think. They are, however, a bit more reliable than VW Passats, and are cheaper to fix/service.
What else.....oh yeah, the Subaru will not get very good gas mileage, think about 20 average. The Passat with the 2.0T engine should see about 27 average.
What else....bang for the buck....the VW gets more by virtue of "coolness", i.e. satellite radio, Ipod integration, sport pkg, etc.
Go with the VW. No question.
The passat will drive WAY better. However, it's NOT AWD, unless you get the 3.6 4motion. Then you're looking at big $$$$.
Nevertheless, the passat will drive better. Handling, comfort, fun.
Subarus ARE NOT as reliable as people would like to think. They are, however, a bit more reliable than VW Passats, and are cheaper to fix/service.
What else.....oh yeah, the Subaru will not get very good gas mileage, think about 20 average. The Passat with the 2.0T engine should see about 27 average.
What else....bang for the buck....the VW gets more by virtue of "coolness", i.e. satellite radio, Ipod integration, sport pkg, etc.
Go with the VW. No question.
#5
Senior Members
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
My Ride: 2006 BMW 550i "Ben Hogan's 5 Iron"
SilverGrey/Black Sport, L7, NAV, CW, AS, Split FR
2003 Audi A4 3.0 CVT "Part of the Moniker"
Silver/Ebony, Prem, CW, Star 17s
If someone is thinking wagon, I'd say stop that damn non-sense and take a look at the new Madza CX-9.
Its a full crossover vehicle running on a completely new and specifically designed chassis. Its more functional than a wagon and I'd say the drive is good as well. Its the big brother of the CX-7, which the critics liked in terms of layout and, importantly, driving mechanicals.
Looks great too. I'd say its in the running for crossover of the year. Check out the Madza website.
Zoom Zoom
CVT Benhogan
Its a full crossover vehicle running on a completely new and specifically designed chassis. Its more functional than a wagon and I'd say the drive is good as well. Its the big brother of the CX-7, which the critics liked in terms of layout and, importantly, driving mechanicals.
Looks great too. I'd say its in the running for crossover of the year. Check out the Madza website.
Zoom Zoom
CVT Benhogan
#6
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
Originally Posted by CVTBenhogan' post='404945' date='Mar 20 2007, 10:40 AM
If someone is thinking wagon, I'd say stop that damn non-sense and take a look at the new Madza CX-9.
Its a full crossover vehicle running on a completely new and specifically designed chassis. Its more functional than a wagon and I'd say the drive is good as well. Its the big brother of the CX-7, which the critics liked in terms of layout and, importantly, driving mechanicals.
Looks great too. I'd say its in the running for crossover of the year. Check out the Madza website.
Zoom Zoom
CVT Benhogan
Its a full crossover vehicle running on a completely new and specifically designed chassis. Its more functional than a wagon and I'd say the drive is good as well. Its the big brother of the CX-7, which the critics liked in terms of layout and, importantly, driving mechanicals.
Looks great too. I'd say its in the running for crossover of the year. Check out the Madza website.
Zoom Zoom
CVT Benhogan
#7
Thread Starter
Contributors
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
Originally Posted by Jed Peter' post='404925' date='Mar 20 2007, 09:09 AM
Okay, this is a good topic for me....I've owned a subaru wagon, passat wagon, and now 530xi wagon.
The passat will drive WAY better. However, it's NOT AWD, unless you get the 3.6 4motion. Then you're looking at big $$$$.
Nevertheless, the passat will drive better. Handling, comfort, fun.
Subarus ARE NOT as reliable as people would like to think. They are, however, a bit more reliable than VW Passats, and are cheaper to fix/service.
What else.....oh yeah, the Subaru will not get very good gas mileage, think about 20 average. The Passat with the 2.0T engine should see about 27 average.
What else....bang for the buck....the VW gets more by virtue of "coolness", i.e. satellite radio, Ipod integration, sport pkg, etc.
Go with the VW. No question.
The passat will drive WAY better. However, it's NOT AWD, unless you get the 3.6 4motion. Then you're looking at big $$$$.
Nevertheless, the passat will drive better. Handling, comfort, fun.
Subarus ARE NOT as reliable as people would like to think. They are, however, a bit more reliable than VW Passats, and are cheaper to fix/service.
What else.....oh yeah, the Subaru will not get very good gas mileage, think about 20 average. The Passat with the 2.0T engine should see about 27 average.
What else....bang for the buck....the VW gets more by virtue of "coolness", i.e. satellite radio, Ipod integration, sport pkg, etc.
Go with the VW. No question.
#8
Members
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Finland
My Ride: 535d touring 2006 M-sport, Mystic blau.
Originally Posted by CVTBenhogan' post='404945' date='Mar 20 2007, 05:40 PM
If someone is thinking wagon, I'd say stop that damn non-sense and take a look at the new Madza CX-9.
Wagons are Better with,
-MPG
-Performance
-Handling
-Almost same space or depending of model, even better..
-Price
I cannot find one reason why crossover would be better than wagon??
#10
Senior Members
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
My Ride: 2006 BMW 550i "Ben Hogan's 5 Iron"
SilverGrey/Black Sport, L7, NAV, CW, AS, Split FR
2003 Audi A4 3.0 CVT "Part of the Moniker"
Silver/Ebony, Prem, CW, Star 17s
Originally Posted by r.a.i.' post='405703' date='Mar 22 2007, 01:03 PM
all the respect, but simple answer:
Wagons are Better with,
-MPG
-Performance
-Handling
-Almost same space or depending of model, even better..
-Price
I cannot find one reason why crossover would be better than wagon??
Wagons are Better with,
-MPG
-Performance
-Handling
-Almost same space or depending of model, even better..
-Price
I cannot find one reason why crossover would be better than wagon??
True,
But in the final analysis, wagons are just sedans with a tad more vertical storage capacity over the truck area. Wagons are cars. Add slightly better load height and thats that. If you need room, especially for larger loads, the greatest functionality is acheived by a van and the newest Crossovers now have this covered.
I'd be one unhappy camper driving a wagon and never carrying anything in it. I can carry plenty in my truck and use the fold down seats. If you got piles of stuff to carry everyday, get something for the job. I think a wagon is a half ass solution to this problem.
Crossover Advantages
1) Fold down seats/greater vertical height in terms of room. (More volume)
2) Third row seating
3) Loading Access
4) More comfortable for younger humans and dogs (long trips a plus)
5) MPG and handling are quite good for such a roomy vehicle
6) Price $37K for a well equiped CX-9
Disadvantages
1) Its not a car
Just my take.
CVT Benhogan