ML63 AMG
#11
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
his dad wants to buy one. they will be available from balkan star beggining april . prices are around 102000euro without VAT,
... no ako ja registrira6 kato bani4arka niama da ima DDS !!!
it will be an AMAZING car with great handling. Yes it will be faster than the turbo but slower than the turbo s...
... no ako ja registrira6 kato bani4arka niama da ima DDS !!!
Originally Posted by Jeffs' post='225953' date='Jan 18 2006, 04:48 PM
hey hey....let's not trashtalk AMG before the ML 63 comes out.
0-60 it would trounce our 545-550...even the cayenne turbo i heard...has to be a heck of a car. And its an SUV, so I would guess that the chassis would be better equipped to handle the power.
0-60 it would trounce our 545-550...even the cayenne turbo i heard...has to be a heck of a car. And its an SUV, so I would guess that the chassis would be better equipped to handle the power.
#12
[/quote]
I was only trying to express my disbeliefs of SUV?s, especially those with high power. If you like a lot of hp in a car, why put it in a 2000kg+ car with high CG? I don?t get it?
#13
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 535d (4/05) M Sport, Carbon black, Black dakota leather, Sport seats, Xenon, Navi prof, Hi-fi pack, AS, BT, PDC, Sunroof
I am set for the time being with that oil-burnin' beema you see on the avatar but family needs an SUV. Its either gonna be the ML in the AMG form or the RRSS/C. The new X5 unfortunately is a wait too long. The 63 looks like its gonna be faster even than the turbo s (5.2 to 100) versus 5 dead for the Merc. Both manufacturer's figures.
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
#14
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sapkan' post='226327' date='Jan 19 2006, 10:08 AM
I am set for the time being with that oil-burnin' beema you see on the avatar but family needs an SUV. Its either gonna be the ML in the AMG form or the RRSS/C. The new X5 unfortunately is a wait too long. The 63 looks like its gonna be faster even than the turbo s (5.2 to 100) versus 5 dead for the Merc. Both manufacturer's figures.
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
prav si maj , gledax go po mobile 4istak nov za 101000euro v germania, v bg 6e platite akziz i ddsto 6e go vzemete obratno... Az li4no sam pora4al 650ci i rover sport SC, i 6e re6a dali da finaliziram pokupkite. Ako SERIOZNO iska6 X5 , moga da te svarza s mcar plovdiv, te 6e ti nameriat za 6 sedmizi max
#15
Originally Posted by cidair' post='226061' date='Jan 18 2006, 12:11 PM
ML63AMG..............whats the purpose with this car .......what is the purpose with sport SUV?s anyway??? 500 hp in a jeep? Talk about runaway train.....
[/quote]
Then by the same token why put it in a heavy four door saloon like an M5 ? Why not only in a lightweight 2 seater ?
#16
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 535d (4/05) M Sport, Carbon black, Black dakota leather, Sport seats, Xenon, Navi prof, Hi-fi pack, AS, BT, PDC, Sunroof
I am set for the time being with that oil-burnin' beema you see on the avatar but family needs an SUV. Its either gonna be the ML in the AMG form or the RRSS/C. The new X5 unfortunately is a wait too long. The 63 looks like its gonna be faster even than the turbo s (5.2 to 100) versus 5 dead for the Merc. Both manufacturer's figures.
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
prav si maj , gledax go po mobile 4istak nov za 101000euro v germania, v bg 6e platite akziz i ddsto 6e go vzemete obratno... Az li4no sam pora4al 650ci i rover sport SC, i 6e re6a dali da finaliziram pokupkite. Ako SERIOZNO iska6 X5 , moga da te svarza s mcar plovdiv, te 6e ti nameriat za 6 sedmizi max
[/quote]
MLa ima i 11% mito shtoto e praven v USA. Malko se obesmislya na bg nomera dori i da zemesh DDSto. Za X5 imah vpredvid novia model koito shte izliza end 2006. Segashnia veche mu ostarya viziyata. Btw utre sum v kamor za CIP update, dano da trugnat teya mp3ki nakraya
#17
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sapkan' post='226327' date='Jan 19 2006, 10:08 AM
I am set for the time being with that oil-burnin' beema you see on the avatar but family needs an SUV. Its either gonna be the ML in the AMG form or the RRSS/C. The new X5 unfortunately is a wait too long. The 63 looks like its gonna be faster even than the turbo s (5.2 to 100) versus 5 dead for the Merc. Both manufacturer's figures.
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
700700 bate tva si e za nemski nomera s tva mito i akziz
prav si maj , gledax go po mobile 4istak nov za 101000euro v germania, v bg 6e platite akziz i ddsto 6e go vzemete obratno... Az li4no sam pora4al 650ci i rover sport SC, i 6e re6a dali da finaliziram pokupkite. Ako SERIOZNO iska6 X5 , moga da te svarza s mcar plovdiv, te 6e ti nameriat za 6 sedmizi max
[/quote]
emi togava Rover sport
e kak nia vzexme x5 predi tri meseza... stra6na e ! za cip ne stiskaj palzi taka i ne zvanna!
#18
Senior Members
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by swajames' post='226188' date='Jan 18 2006, 07:44 PM
[quote name='cidair' post='226061' date='Jan 18 2006, 12:11 PM']
ML63AMG..............whats the purpose with this car .......what is the purpose with sport SUV?s anyway??? 500 hp in a jeep? Talk about runaway train.....
ML63AMG..............whats the purpose with this car .......what is the purpose with sport SUV?s anyway??? 500 hp in a jeep? Talk about runaway train.....
[/quote]
Then by the same token why put it in a heavy four door saloon like an M5 ? Why not only in a lightweight 2 seater ?
[/quote]
Yeah why not on an f1 car?
Or smth similar...why not put it on a 2 door WITH carbon fiber body kit? Why not fit ceramic brakes to that also...why not why not why not..........
You've got it all wrong mate. A suv acts way different than a 4 door saloon (like an e60). Even the top sport suvs.
#19
Thanks BetterMakeWay!
At least someone understands my point AND the physics of car handling, power to weight etc.
Anyway - it?s nice there are soooooooo many different cars to chose from and that I?m able to buy such a fantastic one as the M5
At least someone understands my point AND the physics of car handling, power to weight etc.
Anyway - it?s nice there are soooooooo many different cars to chose from and that I?m able to buy such a fantastic one as the M5
#20
Originally Posted by cidair' post='226487' date='Jan 19 2006, 04:30 PM
Thanks BetterMakeWay!
At least someone understands my point AND the physics of car handling, power to weight etc.
Anyway - it?s nice there are soooooooo many different cars to chose from and that I?m able to buy such a fantastic one as the M5
At least someone understands my point AND the physics of car handling, power to weight etc.
Anyway - it?s nice there are soooooooo many different cars to chose from and that I?m able to buy such a fantastic one as the M5
Love them or loathe them, SUV's are here to stay.