C63 0-60 in 3.9 sec
11-15-2007, 10:44 PM
#11
Senior Members
Originally Posted by big_ipaq' post='492136' date='Nov 9 2007, 02:24 PM
I'd say, it would be slower with a manual. But that's just me.
+1
11-15-2007, 10:44 PM
#12
Senior Members
Originally Posted by elyk' post='492232' date='Nov 9 2007, 06:16 PM
+1
isn't the M5 slower with manual trans?
isn't the M5 slower with manual trans?
The SMG3 isn't an automatic transmission .
11-15-2007, 10:47 PM
#13
Senior Members
Originally Posted by JetBlack5OC' post='486968' date='Oct 28 2007, 06:07 AM
C63 does 0-60 in 3.9 sec. WOW!
11-25-2007, 07:14 AM
#14
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It must KIND of bug the owners of its big brothers which cost 2 or 3 times more AMG mercs that the c63 has the same engine as the top of the line big amg? Maybe a tad detuned or what not but for the most part it is the exact same thing.
Imagine bmw slapping the v10 into an m3 or something. Providing they could balance it etc etc but Not thinking m5/6 owners would be pleased with the little brother m3 blowing by in warp speed for half the cost.
Imagine bmw slapping the v10 into an m3 or something. Providing they could balance it etc etc but Not thinking m5/6 owners would be pleased with the little brother m3 blowing by in warp speed for half the cost.
11-25-2007, 08:34 AM
#15
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 BMW 550i
2006 BMW X3
Originally Posted by redwhiteblue' post='498805' date='Nov 25 2007, 11:14 AM
It must KIND of bug the owners of its big brothers which cost 2 or 3 times more AMG mercs that the c63 has the same engine as the top of the line big amg? Maybe a tad detuned or what not but for the most part it is the exact same thing.
Imagine bmw slapping the v10 into an m3 or something. Providing they could balance it etc etc but Not thinking m5/6 owners would be pleased with the little brother m3 blowing by in warp speed for half the cost.
Imagine bmw slapping the v10 into an m3 or something. Providing they could balance it etc etc but Not thinking m5/6 owners would be pleased with the little brother m3 blowing by in warp speed for half the cost.
11-25-2007, 11:06 AM
#16
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard in NC' post='498844' date='Nov 25 2007, 12:34 PM
I bet the 135i coupe, especially with Procede mods will give the big ///Ms a scare. Its amazing the HP they are putting in affordable cars these days.
I dont know I agree that with bmw you get very little for your money other than a great handling/engine car that is fun to drive. Aside from that not too many goodies come without insane prices.
11-26-2007, 09:30 AM
#17
Contributors
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Runcorn, NW-UK
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed ... I think BMW would do well to offer further modifications to their lineup. Things like maybe lowered springs, brembo brakes, quad exhaust. But I guess they've thought of it, and for whatever reason, decided not to??
01-10-2008, 05:56 AM
#19
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
Originally Posted by EBMCS03' post='504884' date='Dec 9 2007, 11:45 PM
3.9!!!!!! Thats insane for a 4 door saloon!
01-19-2008, 05:38 AM
#20
Members
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cowan Heights, CA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2006, 530 w/ALL OPTIONS and M-Tech:)
So the article didnt like the C63 for its "harsh" design? I personally love the look. Really aggressive and mean. Id still take a 4 door M3.