Editorial: M Division Losing Touch with History?
#1
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by m630' post='1031586' date='Oct 13 2009, 01:55 PM
a sad, but true fact of the world where a MINI ceo runs ///M...only a miracle can turns this nitemare from becoming reality I suppose ![Frown](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/sad.gif)
![Frown](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/sad.gif)
#4
Contributors
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by swajames' post='1031596' date='Oct 13 2009, 05:09 PM
+1, it is indeed sad but true. There's no doubt that these new M engines are going to be stellar, but by adopting forced induction BMW is essentially going with the "me too" philosophy and following Audi and MB who blazed that trail before them. M was always the one that stayed truest to what many consider to be its core principles. Funny how it's now MB that seems to be taking the lead on getting prodigious power (and torque) from a normally aspirated powerplant.
#5
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
While I totally agree with above posts, the company has to move with the times. Yes it's sad to see the engines we love go to the weigh side, but it is in the interest of something better and more efficient. The world is demanding something more efficient with little to no power loss and what is the solution? forced induction. A technology can only be taken so far until it's unable to be adapted to compete. I predict that in the next 20 years there will be an even bigger shift in what any performance car is powered by.
#6
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TexaZ3' post='1031722' date='Oct 13 2009, 04:36 PM
While I totally agree with above posts, the company has to move with the times. Yes it's sad to see the engines we love go to the weigh side, but it is in the interest of something better and more efficient. The world is demanding something more efficient with little to no power loss and what is the solution? forced induction. A technology can only be taken so far until it's unable to be adapted to compete. I predict that in the next 20 years there will be an even bigger shift in what any performance car is powered by.
#7
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by swajames' post='1032141' date='Oct 14 2009, 10:59 AM
No doubt FI is more efficient, but I'm not sure it's necessarily better. These cars sell in comparatively low volumes so it's not going to have much impact on BMW's CAFE obligations, and, frankly, buyers of a 100K car aren't overly concerned with running costs. The two major losses are in the rev range and exhaust note, the current V10 spins to around 8500 RPM whereas the turbo engines top out with a greatly reduced redline and there's no getting away from the fact that the turbo will take the edge off the exhaust. No question that the extra torque will make up for some of the deficit, but at this level I'd take the current RPM and noise over the extra torque.
TT V8 - 7000 rpm 555 hp
How often do you drive at 7000 rpm?
#9
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 Porsche 911 Carrera S Convertible. Midnight Blue, 6 Speed.Retired - 2007 997 Carrera S, Midnight Blue, Grey leather, premium audioRetired - 2007 550i, Monaco Blue over Beige, Navigation, Logic 7, Cold Weather Pack, Comfort Access, Sport Package
Model Year: 2008
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TexaZ3' post='1033607' date='Oct 15 2009, 09:37 PM
Current V10 - 8250 rpm 507 hp
TT V8 - 7000 rpm 555 hp
How often do you drive at 7000 rpm?
TT V8 - 7000 rpm 555 hp
How often do you drive at 7000 rpm?
#10
Contributors
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by swajames' post='1033784' date='Oct 16 2009, 09:07 AM
If i had the V10, it would be every single day.
![Big Grin](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/biggrin.gif)
///and checking the dyno on the wannabee.anM.trucks, youd never want to get past 5K-6K in near any situation
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/rolleyes.gif)
![Whistling](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/whistling.gif)