Accelerate Rapidly for Better Gas Mileage
#11
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
Originally Posted by Znod' post='227429' date='Jan 21 2006, 09:24 AM
Hi Friends:
I have described my driving procedures before--which coincide for enjoying my car and for good mileage. I aways drive in DS--using a combination of manual and automatic shifting--with the emphasis on manual. I tend to get up to speed pretty quickly usually letting my engine get to 4k or 5k RPM before shifting. In this regard, I tend to maximize the time that my instantaneous MPG meter shows 20 MPG or better. It turns out that there is an explanation of why the rapid-acceleration part of my procedures may work. So, from Road and Track November 2005 we have:
"Full-Throttle Economy
If piston engines are most efficient at full throttle, won't we maximize fuel economy by flooring the pedal after every stop to get up to cruising speed? Or indeed any time we want to increase speed? (This is contrary to conventional wisdom which says that gradual acceleration is the best way to maximize economy.)
David Bookstaber
Berwyn, Pennsylvania
To oversimplify, yes. Given the practicalities of real engines, accelerating at three-quarter throttle (enough to reap a reduction in pumping losses but not enough to invoke wide-open-throttle fuel enrichment) returns excellent mileage. But in the real world of crawling traffic, such a rapid gain to cruising speed is not always practical. Also, this technique often results in acceleration to an unnecessarily high speed (especially between stoplights and other closely spaced impediments)."
I have described my driving procedures before--which coincide for enjoying my car and for good mileage. I aways drive in DS--using a combination of manual and automatic shifting--with the emphasis on manual. I tend to get up to speed pretty quickly usually letting my engine get to 4k or 5k RPM before shifting. In this regard, I tend to maximize the time that my instantaneous MPG meter shows 20 MPG or better. It turns out that there is an explanation of why the rapid-acceleration part of my procedures may work. So, from Road and Track November 2005 we have:
"Full-Throttle Economy
If piston engines are most efficient at full throttle, won't we maximize fuel economy by flooring the pedal after every stop to get up to cruising speed? Or indeed any time we want to increase speed? (This is contrary to conventional wisdom which says that gradual acceleration is the best way to maximize economy.)
David Bookstaber
Berwyn, Pennsylvania
To oversimplify, yes. Given the practicalities of real engines, accelerating at three-quarter throttle (enough to reap a reduction in pumping losses but not enough to invoke wide-open-throttle fuel enrichment) returns excellent mileage. But in the real world of crawling traffic, such a rapid gain to cruising speed is not always practical. Also, this technique often results in acceleration to an unnecessarily high speed (especially between stoplights and other closely spaced impediments)."
#12
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Originally Posted by Bimmer32' post='227638' date='Jan 21 2006, 05:12 PM
Are you saying to start the car in 4k-5k rpm is the most efficient way? It appears that when I drive 48 mph (per the mpg rating), my rpm is at around 2k range. Wouldn't that be the most efficient rpm range?
When you are cruising 4-5K RPMs isnt good but when you are acceleration to a cruising speed 4-5K RPM might be most efficient. That way the car accelerates quickly to the cruising speed with the lest effort.
When cruising you want a balance of least amount of gas appled with the lowest amount of RPMs this when when the MPG guage is useful.
#13
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by Trev550i' post='227534' date='Jan 21 2006, 03:27 PM
so you always drive in ds mode znod and accelerate fairly quickly? Do you have to replace the brakes more often?
#14
Contributors
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW 545i, Silver Grey, Sport Package, R. Shades, Cold Pkg, Sat. Rad., Prem. Sound.
When you are cruising 4-5K RPMs isnt good but when you are acceleration to a cruising speed 4-5K RPM might be most efficient. That way the car accelerates quickly to the cruising speed with the lest effort.
When cruising you want a balance of least amount of gas appled with the lowest amount of RPMs this when when the MPG guage is useful.
[/quote]
If I accelerate to 4-5k rpm every time to cruising speed, I'm going to hit every cars that's in front of me.
#15
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by Bobbin-Man' post='227443' date='Jan 21 2006, 11:21 AM
I worked this out a few years back in my e39 and it really does return pretty good economy figures.
I've concluded that it simply is based on the fact that the increased engine efficiency as revs increase rapidly is more than the addition fuel used to reach the desired speed, ie. get the acceleration bit out of the way quickly then you can get on with economical driving. Doesn't half make driving economically more fun
I've concluded that it simply is based on the fact that the increased engine efficiency as revs increase rapidly is more than the addition fuel used to reach the desired speed, ie. get the acceleration bit out of the way quickly then you can get on with economical driving. Doesn't half make driving economically more fun
#16
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
#18
Contributors
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 545iSMGSilver GrayAuburn Dakota LeatherLogic 7 Premium SoundSports Package
Originally Posted by Bimmer32' post='227655' date='Jan 21 2006, 07:31 PM
If I accelerate to 4-5k rpm every time to cruising speed, I'm going to hit every cars that's in front of me.
AH thats their problem tell them to get out of the way... Minor details..
#19
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by tab545' post='227559' date='Jan 21 2006, 04:32 PM
I thought I had heard something about the Valvetronic Double-VANOS system in the 545 reducing these pumping losses.
See the attached, http://www.bmwworld.com/technology/valvetronic.htm, which talks about this engine's reduction of those typical partial-throttle power losses.
So the point may still be true, partially, it may not make much difference, or any, on my car.
But I won't tell our wives if you won't. I like an excuse for the jackrabbit starts, too.
See the attached, http://www.bmwworld.com/technology/valvetronic.htm, which talks about this engine's reduction of those typical partial-throttle power losses.
So the point may still be true, partially, it may not make much difference, or any, on my car.
But I won't tell our wives if you won't. I like an excuse for the jackrabbit starts, too.
#20
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2014 X5 xDrive 5.0 M Package Carbon Black Metallic/2008 M Roadster Imola Red
Originally Posted by Mr 5er' post='227613' date='Jan 21 2006, 07:21 PM
Well I see I learn something new, each and every time I read this forum. Good info....thanks